Head to Head: Capita vs. Aggreko

LONDON -- In this series, some of your favorite FTSE 100 (UKX) shares go head to head in a three-round contest for superiority.

In Round 1, the firms fight on earnings; in Round 2, on dividends; and Round 3 is a battle of the balance sheets. The winner will be the company that has racked up most points at the end of the contest.

Stepping into the ring today are support services groups Capita and Aggreko . Capita is focused on white-collar office support services; Aggreko could be described as more blue collar, supplying temporary power generation and industrial cooling and air conditioning.

The shares of both companies have outperformed the FTSE 100 over the past year. The Footsie is up 7%, but Aggreko is up 19% and Capita 21%.

Let's take our seats at ringside.

Round 1: earnings



Recent share price



Last year price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio



Current year forecast P/E



Four-year earnings per share (EPS) compound annual growth rate (CAGR) (%)



Current year forecast EPS growth (%)



Forecast operating margin (%)



Source: Digital Look. Winners in bold.

Capita easily wins the points for P/E, but Aggreko is equally dominant in scoring on earnings growth. The first round is decided in Aggreko's favor when it takes the final point for a comfortably superior operating margin.

Round 2: dividends



Last year dividend yield (%)



Current year forecast dividend yield (%)



Four-year dividend CAGR (%)



Current year forecast dividend growth (%)



Forecast dividend cover



Source: Digital Look. Winners in bold.

It's a similar story in round two. Capita again takes the first two points easily and Aggreko hits back with very strong growth numbers. Again, the round is decided in Aggreko's favor on the final point -- this time, more conservative dividend cover.

Round 3: balance sheet



Price-to-book (P/B) ratio



Net gearing (%)



Source: Digital Look. Winners in bold.

Aggreko powers ahead in the final round, taking both points. At the end of the contest, Aggreko has won all three rounds. The overall points tally is Aggreko eight and Capita four.

Post-match assessment
This was a comfortable win for Aggreko. Capita managed just four points -- for historic and forecast P/E and dividend yield -- but while these "value" scores are good relative to Aggreko's, they're not particularly generous compared with the average for the FTSE 100 as a whole.

Aggreko's victory in the contest was driven by very strong growth of earnings and dividend. It also has a decent operating margin and fairly modest gearing. However, while a high P/E of above 20 doesn't look unreasonable against Aggreko's historic earnings growth, it looks less attractive when considered against the more modest growth forecast for the current year.

Aggreko's growth will have to return to closer to the historic rate to justify a P/E in the 20s. For me, the company looks fully valued at the present time.

One investor who has mastered the art of buying the right companies at the right price is City wizard Neil Woodford. Woodford has thrashed the market over the past 15 years precisely by waiting for opportunities to invest in blue-chip companies when they are on attractive valuations.

If you're interested in learning about Woodford's enormously successful strategy -- and eight of the blue-chip companies he currently favors -- you can help yourself to a free and exclusive Motley Fool report. This free report is available for a limited time only, but it can be in your inbox in seconds: simply click here.


The article Head to Head: Capita vs. Aggreko originally appeared on Fool.com.

G. A. Chester has no positions in the stocks mentioned above. The Motley Fool has no positions in the stocks mentioned above. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2012 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.