(Money Magazine) -- Roth 401(k)s used to be fairly rare, but they're starting to crop up by the bushelful.
Two in five private-sector plans offer these tax-advantaged retirement accounts, with another 29% likely to add them this year, according to Aon Hewitt. And the federal government began offering Roths to 3.3 million of its employees in May.
Yet workers have been slow to bite. Only 6% of savers who are eligible have signed up. "Part of that is employees are already in traditional 401(k)s and don't have the time or capacity to make a decision to change," says Charlotte, N.C., financial planner William Bissett. There's also the extra "cost" involved.
Just as with a Roth IRA, Roth 401(k)s are funded with after-tax dollars, while withdrawals are tax-free. The upfront tax hit, though, means stuffing $17,000 -- the annual federal max for all 401(k) accounts combined if you're under 50 -- will actually take $23,610 if you're in the 28% federal bracket.
Clearly, a Roth isn't for everyone. To see if you'd benefit, ask yourself the following questions:
Am I sure I'll be in a higher bracket later? Because workers who'd gain are those in a lower bracket now (when taxes are paid) than at retirement, Roths are especially attractive to young savers, says T. Rowe Price financial planner Stuart Ritter.
As the table shows, a 30-year-old at the 25% marginal rate today who retires in a higher bracket could generate 15% more retirement income by going with a Roth. In fact, that same person would do better with a Roth 401(k) even if he retires at the same 25% tax rate. Chalk it up to the long-term impact of tax-free compounding.
Others who stand to benefit are high earners in the top brackets who plan to maintain that level of income in retirement. If you fall into either of these groups, read on. If not, skip to the last question.
Have I weighed other complicating factors? Even if you think your tax rate will be higher later on (insert snarky comment about Washington pols itching to raise your taxes here), a Roth might still not be a slam dunk. What if you work in a high-tax state like New York but plan to retire to income-tax-free Florida or Nevada?
Also, understand it's your "effective" tax rate that matters at retirement, not your marginal bracket. Say you're single, putting away 10% of your $80,000 pay, and are planning to tap $40,000 a year in retirement. In a Roth 401(k), your $8,000 contribution will be taxed at your 25% rate. This may not seem that bad if you expect to be in the same bracket later on.
But in a progressive tax system, not every dime of income you generate later on will be taxed at your marginal rate. In this case, the first $8,700 will be taxed at 10%; the next $26,650 at 15%; and the final $4,650 will be hit with 25%, for an effective rate of 15.1%.
More on Retirement from CNNMoney
Will the Roth negatively affect other taxes? Contributing to a traditional 401(k) will reduce your adjusted gross income, which in turn could lower the chances of being hit with the dreaded alternative minimum tax. Roth contributions won't.
Fail to reduce your AGI and "you may also lose tax credits and the deductibility of certain expenses," says Eric Lewis, a planner in Los Altos, Calif. Medical deductions, for instance, are limited only to those expenses that exceed 7.5% of your AGI.
Are there special circumstances that weigh in the Roth's favor? Roths appeal to those who want to pass money on to heirs, since there are no required minimum distributions starting at 70½ if you roll the account into a Roth IRA.
They're attractive to high-income households for another reason. Married couples filing jointly begin to lose the ability to fully fund a Roth IRA once their income exceeds $173,000. Yet these IRAs can help diversify the tax treatment of your retirement funds.
Earn too much for a Roth IRA? You can get the same diversification via a Roth 401(k), says Bissett. Ideally, he says, you want "different buckets to pull money from in the future as you're taking distributions."