Is This a Bad Sign for Citi Shareholders?
Hedge fund star Bill Ackman recently sold about three-quarters of a billion dollars worth of Citigroup from his Pershing Square Capital Management fund. Was he right? Fool.com senior analyst Anand Chokkavelu points out that managers often buy and sell for different reasons than the individual investor does. For instance, Ackman sold the Citigroup stock partially because he needed to free up funds to place a $2 billion investment into Procter & Gamble. He's still bullish on Citigroup, but he thinks there are less risky ways to make money. Procter & Gamble would certainly qualify as less risky. Anand doesn't believe Ackman's Citigroup move should influence bulls or bears much. For more, see the following video.
With so many of the big financial firms getting bad press these days, you may be inclined to stay away from the sector entirely, but that could be a huge mistake. In fact, some of the best opportunities over the next few years can be found there, including one small, under-the-radar bank. It's been called one of The Stocks Only the Smartest Investors Are Buying. You can learn about it, and more, in our exclusive free report. Just click here to keep reading.
The article Is This a Bad Sign for Citi Shareholders? originally appeared on Fool.com.Anand Chokkavelu and Andrew Tonner have no positions in the stocks mentioned above. The Motley Fool owns shares of Citigroup. Motley Fool newsletter services recommend Procter & Gamble. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.