Why Starbucks Needs to Drop Another 10%


Before heart rates rise too quickly, let me say this: I think Starbucks is a first-rate business. As a caffeine addict and coffee shop frequenter, I find the megachain to be surprisingly homey. The oversized chairs, constant 20-somethings music, and endearing quotes on everything from the cups to the bathroom sink make the stores simply desirable places to be. But as a stock, it's been too expensive for too long. Let me show you why.

Bigger than Ronald
I know for growth stocks like Starbucks (NYS: SBUX) , you pay a premium up front. Really, I get it. But let's get off that horse for a second and address the reality behind the valuations.

Paying near 30 times earnings for a $36 billion company is tough to stomach, no matter how "growthy" you might be. As analyst David Trainer pointed out on CNBC, at current valuations, Starbucks needs to grow profits at around 15% compounded annually for the next 10 years to justify its price. The company made around $1.25 billion net in 2011. To earn its valuation, Starbucks would need to bring in just more than $5 billion after tax. That would put it in the same league as McDonald's (NYS: MCD) , which earned around $5.5 billion in net income for 2011. The only difference is that McDonald's is a much bigger, much more established chain that trades around 16 times earnings -- nearly half that of Starbucks.

So on a day when the market crosses 13,000, Starbucks is down 10%. My math is based on today's share price -- not before the 10% drop.

To get more in line with the realm of reality, Starbucks needs to continue to drop. I'm sorry, investors, but it's for your own good. You can either sit on this stock for a decade and watch it wobble around as inflation eats your lunch, or you can buy in when the stock drops even more and dollar-cost-average yourself into the black.

Which would you rather have?

"But it's Starbucks!"
Yes, yes -- I know Starbucks is the first company to put a coffee shop on the moon (what?), but we have to play by the rules, guys. Look what happened when we all bought Netflix (NAS: NFLX) because it changed the way we watched TV and movies. Some of us paid $200 per share for a stock that should trade around $40 and today is a little under $60. The stock didn't fall because Netflix is a bad company; it's not. It fell because Mr. Market woke up from his drug-induced coma and realized it's hard for a company to grow double-digit bottom lines for eons without running into a single roadblock. It just doesn't work out that way.

The truth is that the best thing this stock could do for your portfolio is to drop another 10% or even 20%. Realistically, we could see this before the end of the year, as it looks like the market is beginning to see the light. If you are a current Starbucks shareholder, or you're looking to get in, I would wait patiently for this to happen and have my hand on the buy button when it does.

As for now...
Starbucks ain't goin' nowhere. It's a caffeine-pushing powerhouse with amazing profitability and top-level management. But in the meantime, it may be worth turning your attention to more reasonably priced stocks with similar stories to that of Starbucks.

Two stocks we like here at the Fool are cash machines. They're in the retail business, and they're pushing the old guard, including Wal-Mart, out. Read this free report about the real cash kings of retail, and you will forget you even looked Starbucks up. Click here to claim your copy now.

The article Why Starbucks Needs to Drop Another 10% originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Michael Lewis owns none of the stocks mentioned. You can follow him on Twitter @mikeylewy.The Motley Fool owns shares of Netflix, McDonald's, and Starbucks.Motley Fool newsletter serviceshave recommended buying shares of Starbucks, Netflix, and McDonald's.Motley Fool newsletter serviceshave recommended writing covered calls on Starbucks.Motley Fool newsletter serviceshave recommended creating a bull call spread position in Wal-Mart Stores. The Motley Fool has adisclosure policy.We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe thatconsidering a diverse range of insightsmakes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter servicesfree for 30 days.

Copyright © 1995 - 2012 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Originally published