The Federal Reserve continues whipping the reluctant economy to push forward with its announcement of keeping rates below 1% -- probably until late 2014. These near-zero interest rates have been tried in the past, with not-so-spectacular results, as illustrated by Japan's "lost decades."
Is our economy following the trail that Japan blazed, and are we headed for a few lost decades of our own?
Following the burst of Japan's property bubble of the 1980s, Japan's Nikkei (INDEX: ^N225) index retreated from its onetime high of 38,957 yen in 1989 to its current value around 8,900 yen. One dollar, or yen, invested at the peak of the market would be worth $0.23. The Dow Jones (INDEX: ^DJI) has already shrunk about 10% from its 2007 high of 14,164 to its current 12,670.
Japan's GDP also limped ahead in the '90s, with an average growth rate of about 1.5% compared to the U.S. rate of 3.2%. Since 2000, Japan's growth rate at about 1% remained half of the U.S. rate of about 2%. Any way you slice Japan's GDP growth, it's been anemic and has lagged other developed nations.
Could this slowdown happen to the U.S.? Is it already happening? Let's look at a few similarities.
Central bank rates
Just like Japan's central bank, the Fed has cut interest rates leading to our current zero interest rate policy, or ZIRP for short:
The Fed predicts increasing its rate in a few years, but Japan has held its rate at or below 1% since 1995 and failed to spur any meaningful growth. Now, the U.S. flirted with near-zero rates before, but our own housing bubble floated the economy and allowed the Fed to increase rates in 2005, before again cutting them to near zero.
After this failed, both central banks in Japan and the U.S. moved to the next option to pump the economy -- quantitative easing, also known as QE. The Bank of Japan purchased government bonds from the secondary market starting in 2001, while the Fed began purchasing other assets in 2008, which began programs nicknamed QE1 and QE2. Through flooding more money into the market, the central banks hoped to drive lending. Japan's results were mixed, with no clear positive outcome from its quantitative easing. On the effectiveness of the Fed's actions, last September former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan said, "I find it very difficult to find any significant impact as yet from QE1 and QE2." Many analysts believe current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke's latest statements point to more actions, or a QE3.
While the central banks push their economic horses to water, the governments drown in debt to get them to drink. Through beefy stimulus packages, governments spend on infrastructure projects, cut taxes, or do anything else possible to improve the economy and remain in power. The U.S. and Japan ran up quite a tab:
Japan's figures begin in 1991 while the U.S. figures begin in 2006. The dotted line is projected.
Japan's debt continues to climb -- its gross debt-to-GDP now sits at a staggering 234%! Arguments about whether that high of a debt level means anything abound, but the takeaway here is that the U.S. debt growth matches Japan's and could signal potentially similar conditions for low future growth.
Real estate values
From the peak of Japan's housing bubble in 1991, the Urban Land Price Index, which measures Japan's land value trends, has declined every single year. Since the peak of the U.S. housing bubble in 2006, the Case-Shiller Index, which measures price changes in 20 major U.S. metro areas, has trended in a similar direction:
Of course, demographics affect demand for real estate and values, and whereas the U.S. population is growing at a rate of 0.963%, Japan's population is actually shrinking -- its growth rate is -0.278%. But for the economy, consumers spend less when they watch what is usually their largest asset -- namely, a home -- shrink in worth.
The Foolish takeaway
These similarities don't mean the U.S. is destined for slow growth. The two countries still have vast differences, like our growing population and political resistance to ever higher debt ceilings. But if these economic markers continue to follow in Japan's footsteps, I'd put my money on a different horse for higher growth.
Bear or bull, one stock to ride in this tumultuous market is The Motley Fool's chief investment officer's top stock for 2012. This stock is growing its dividend yield while mimicking a proven model -- learn all about it in this free report!
At the time thisarticle was published Fool contributor Dan Newman would love to see some different trends. He also holds no shares of any companies mentioned above. Follow him @TMFHelloNewman. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2012 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.