What Kimberly-Clark Does With Its Cash
In the quest to find great investments, most investors focus on earnings to gauge a company's financial strength. This is a good start, but earnings can be misleading and incomplete. To get a clearer understanding of a company's ability to earn money and reward you, the shareholder, it's often better to focus on cash flow. In this series, we tear apart a company's cash flow statement to see how much money is truly being earned, and more important, what management is doing with that cash.
Step on up, Kimberly-Clark (NYS: KMB) .
The first step in analyzing cash flow is to look at net income. Kimberly-Clark's net income over the last five years has been impressive:
2011* | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normalized Net Income | $1.7 billion | $1.7 billion | $1.8 billion | $1.5 billion | $1.5 billion |
Source: S&P Capital IQ. *12 months ended Sept. 30.
Next, we add back in a few non-cash expenses like the depreciation of assets, and adjust net income for changes in inventory, accounts receivable, and accounts payable -- changes in cash levels that reflect a company either paying its bills, or being paid by customers. This yields a figure called cash from operating activities -- the amount of cash a company generates from doing everyday business.
From there, we subtract capital expenditures, or the amount a company spends acquiring or fixing physical assets. This yields one version of a figure called free cash flow, or the true amount of cash a company has left over for its investors after doing business:
2011* | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Free Cash Flow | $1.7 billion | $1.8 billion | $2.6 billion | $1.6 billion | $1.4 billion |
Source: S&P Capital IQ. *12 months ended Sept. 30.
Now we know how much cash Kimberly-Clark is really pulling in each year. Next question: What is it doing with that cash?
There are two ways a company can use free cash flow to directly reward shareholders: dividends and share repurchases. Cash not returned to shareholders can either be stashed in the bank, used to invest in other companies, or to pay off debt.
Here's how much Kimberly-Clark has returned to shareholders in recent years:
2011* | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dividends | $1.1 | $1.1 | $1.0 | $1.0 | $0.9 |
Share Repurchases | $1.4 | $0.8 | NM | $0.7 | $2.8 |
Total Returned to Shareholders | $2.5 | $1.9 | $1.0 | $1.7 | $3.7 |
Source: S&P Capital IQ. *12 months ended Sept. 30. NM = not meaningful; Kimberly-Clark purchased a negligible amount of shares in 2009.
As you can see, the company has repurchased a decent amount of its own stock. That's caused its shares outstanding to fall over the last five years:
2011* | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shares Outstanding (millions) | 399 | 412 | 416 | 419 | 443 |
Source: S&P Capital IQ. *12 months ended Sept. 30.
Now, companies tend to be fairly poor at repurchasing their own shares, buying feverishly when shares are expensive and backing away when they're cheap. Does Kimberly-Clark fall into this trap? Let's take a look:
Source: S&P Capital IQ.
Sure enough: Kimberly-Clark repurchased a large amount of stock in 2007 when shares were fairly pricey, and then ceased almost entirely in 2009 when shares were cheap. Whether this was a prudent use of cash as it looked like the economy was about to implode, or a classic example of buying high and panicking low, is up for debate. In general, it doesn't appear management has been the most astute buyer of its own stock.
Finally, I like to look at how dividends have added to total shareholder returns:
Source: S&P Capital IQ.
Over the last five years, Kimberly-Clark shares returned 30%, which drops to 7% without dividends -- not a bad boost to top off already decent share performance.
To gauge how well a company is doing, keep an eye on the cash. How much a company earns is not as important as how much cash is actually coming in the door, and how much cash is coming in the door isn't as important as what management actually does with that cash. Remember, you, the shareholder, own the company. Are you happy with the way management has used Kimberly-Clark's cash? Sound off in the comments section below.
Add Kimberly-Clark to My Watchlist.
At the time thisarticle was published Fool contributor Morgan Housel doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. Follow him on Twitter @TMFHousel. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Kimberly-Clark. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2012 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
