Is Coca-Cola's Stock More Expensive Than Its 12.0 P/E Ratio?

Updated
Is Coca-Cola's Stock More Expensive Than Its 12.0 P/E Ratio?

Numbers can lie -- yet they're the best first step in determining whether a stock is a buy. In this series, we use some carefully chosen metrics to size up a stock's true value based on the following clues:

  • The current price multiples.

  • The consistency of past earnings and cash flow.

  • How much growth we can expect.

Let's see what those numbers can tell us about how expensive or cheap Coca-Cola (NYS: KO) might be.

The current price multiples
First, we'll look at most investors' favorite metric: the P/E ratio. It divides the company's share price by its earnings per share (EPS) -- the lower, the better.

Then we'll take things up a notch with a more advanced metric: enterprise value to unlevered free cash flow, which divides the company's enterprise value (basically, its market cap plus its debt, minus its cash) by its unlevered free cash flow (its free cash flow, adding back the interest payments on its debt). As with the P/E, the lower this number is, the better.

Analysts argue about which is more important -- earnings or cash flow. Who cares? A good buy ideally has low multiples on both.

Coca-Cola has a P/E ratio of 12.0 and an EV/FCF ratio of 24.2 over the trailing 12 months. If we stretch and compare current valuations with the five-year averages for earnings and free cash flow, we see that Coca-Cola has a P/E ratio of 20.0 and a five-year EV/FCF ratio of 25.9.

A positive one-year ratio of less than 10 for both metrics is ideal (at least in my opinion). For a five-year metric, less than 20 is ideal.

Coca-Cola is 0-for-4 on hitting the ideal targets, but let's see how it stacks up against some of its competitors and industry mates.

Company

1-Year P/E

1-Year EV/FCF

5-Year P/E

5-Year EV/FCF

Coca-Cola

12.0

24.2

20.0

25.9

PepsiCo (NYS: PEP)

15.7

22.3

16.8

24.6

Kraft

20.6

28.3

20.9

29.7

Campbell Soup

13.1

12.7

11.8

17.2

Source: S&P Capital IQ; NM = not meaningful because of losses.

Numerically, we've seen how Coca-Cola's valuation rates on both an absolute and relative basis. Next, let's examine ...

The consistency of past earnings and cash flow
An ideal company will be consistently strong in its earnings and cash-flow generation.

In the past five years, Coca-Cola's net income margin has ranged from 18.7% to 27.6%. In that same time frame, unlevered free cash flow margin has ranged from 14.8% to 23.1%.

How do those figures compare with those of the company's peers? See for yourself:

Source: S&P Capital IQ; margin ranges are combined.

Source: S&P Capital IQ; margin ranges are combined.

In addition, over the past five years, Coke has tallied up five years of positive earnings and five years of positive free cash flow.

Next, let's figure out ...

How much growth we can expect
Analysts tend to comically overstate their five-year growth estimates. If you accept them at face value, you willoverpay for stocks. But even though you should definitely take the analysts' prognostications with a grain of salt, they can still provide a useful starting point when compared with similar numbers from a company's closest rivals.

Let's start by seeing what this company's done over the past five years. In that time period, Coca-Cola has put up past EPS growth rates of 19.4%. Meanwhile, Wall Street's analysts expect future growth rates of 10.2%.

Here's how Coke compares with its peers for trailing-five-year growth:

Source: S&P Capital IQ; EPS growth shown.

Source: S&P Capital IQ; EPS growth shown.

And here's how it measures up with regard to the growth analysts expect over the next five years:

Source: S&P Capital IQ; estimates for EPS growth.

Source: S&P Capital IQ; estimates for EPS growth.

The bottom line
The pile of numbers we've plowed through has shown us the price multiples that shares of Coca-Cola are trading at, the volatility of its operational performance, and what kind of growth profile it has -- both on an absolute and a relative basis.

The more consistent a company's performance has been and the more growth we can expect, the more we should be willing to pay. We've gone well beyond looking at a cheap-looking 12.0 P/E ratio, and we see that Coke's EV/FCF and 5-year multiples are more dear. This is because its earnings were juiced by a gain from an asset sale.

On a five-year basis, Coke's shares are trading at a premium to its main competitor, Pepsi. But for that premium we see higher margins, more past growth, and more expected future growth (from analysts). It's important to note that we're comparing two premier blue-chip companies here. The operational numbers for both Coke and Pepsi are impressive.

Despite the premium multiples, our CAPS community rates Coke (and Pepsi) five stars out of five. Coke is one of my favorite long-term companies, but I've been waiting for an opportune buy-in price. But all this is just a start. If you find Coca-Cola's numbers or story compelling, don't stop here. Continue your due-diligence process until you're confident one way or the other. As a start, add it to My Watchlist to find all of our Foolish analysis.

I wrote about a stock that's flying under the radar in our brand new free report: "The Stocks Only the Smartest Investors Are Buying." I invite you to take a free copy to find out the name of the company I believe Warren Buffett would be interested in if he could still invest in small companies.

At the time thisarticle was published Anand Chokkaveluholds no position in any company mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of PepsiCo and Coca-Cola.Motley Fool newsletter serviceshave recommended buying shares of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo and creating a diagonal call position in PepsiCo. Try any of our Foolish newsletter servicesfree for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe thatconsidering a diverse range of insightsmakes us better investors. The Motley Fool has adisclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2012 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Advertisement