Big tobacco companies don't usually garner much sympathy, but it appears at least one person is acting in their favor. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon ruled to temporarily block the requirement of graphic images appearing on cigarettes, citing First Amendment rights.
Cigarette companies includingLorillard (NYS: LO) , Reynolds American (NYS: RAI) , and Vector Group (NYS: VGR) filed a suit defending against the requirement. This is their first legal challenge after 45 years of accepting the mandated medical warnings on their packages.
Judge Leon's stance is that the graphic nature of the labels goes beyond conveying facts and crosses the boundary into advocacy. He believes this violates the cigarette companies' free-speech rights. In his 29-page opinion on the matter, he wrote, "It is abundantly clear from viewing these images that the emotional response they were crafted to induce is calculated to provoke the viewer to quit, or never to start smoking -- an objective wholly apart from disseminating purely factual and uncontroversial information."
A smoky future
Judge Leon's ruling may provide a temporary breather for manufacturers, but it doesn't make the environment any more hospitable for them. Given the ever-escalating nature of smoking restrictions, though, I'm sure they're just glad it isn't getting worse, at least not yet.
The domestic market for cigarette manufacturers is becoming increasingly difficult as marketing restrictions, smoking bans, litigations, and excise taxes put downward pressure on the industry. It is threats like this that prompted Altria's (NYS: MO) 2008 spinoff of Philip Morris International (NYS: PM) , as the newly independent company would be better protected from U.S. lawsuits and regulations by focusing abroad. The industry pinch is beginning to be felt by the former parent, though, as Altria recently announced plans to lay off 15% of its workforce on declining domestic sales.
With many states still facing budgetary shortfalls, I wouldn't be surprised to see cigarette taxes tick upward in the future as a way for them to garner additional revenue. And with the overall domestic opinion of smoking declining, companies can probably expect continued regulation and litigation with little resistance going forward.
Given these market conditions, companies will probably have to increasingly rely on smokeless and low-tobacco products like those manufactured by Star Scientific (NAS: CIGX) . Its ultra-low carcinogen products greatly reduce the toxins present in tobacco, skirt many industry restrictions like the indoor smoking ban, and have generally lower litigation risk.
While cigarette companies are probably cheering Judge Leon, his ruling is a drop in the bucket and probably won't dramatically change the future of cigarette manufacturers. Many have written off high growth in this industry and are instead looking to the dividends, like the 6% one thrown off by Altria, as their most valuable portfolio contribution. Others think the smokeless-tobacco segment has a lot of room ahead of it and can still capture high growth.
I think Big Tobacco can still be a rewarding investment. Dividend payouts remain high, and companies with an international focus have huge markets in front of them.
If you like the idea of dividends but are uncertain about big tobacco's future, I invite you to check out The Motley Fool's special free report "Secure Your Future With 11 Rock-Solid Dividend Stocks." Thousands of investors looking to land consistent income have already requested it. It's free!
At the time thisarticle was published Austin Smith owns no shares of the companies mentioned here. The Motley Fool owns shares of Altria Group and Philip Morris International.Motley Fool newsletter serviceshave recommended buying shares of Philip Morris International and creating a bear put ladder position in Lorillard. Try any of our Foolish newsletter servicesfree for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe thatconsidering a diverse range of insightsmakes us better investors. The Motley Fool has adisclosure policy.