Why are investors willing to pay only 10 times earnings for some stocks, but 20, 50, even 100 times earnings for others?
The short answer: growth. Companies that can grow their earnings meaningfully could make lofty current P/E ratios look cheap in hindsight.
Of course, any company can promise a rosy, growth-rich future. Figuring out which companies can actually deliver is far trickier. In this series, I take the first step by identifying companies that have put up the best growth track records in their respective sectors.
Below, I've listed the top publicly traded sales growers in industrial conglomerates over the last five years. Here's how to interpret each data column.
Five-year sales growth: I rank each company's sales growth, to capture its pure trailing expansion without regard to the vagaries of earnings.
Five-year EPS growth: Since sales growth means nothing if it doesn't ultimately fall to the bottom line, I've also included each company's five-year trailing EPS growth rate.
Five-year analyst estimates: This column shows us how much EPS growth analysts expect over the next five years. Just keep in mind that analysts tend to grossly overestimate a company's prospects.
Five-year ROIC range:Return on invested capital basically shows you how efficiently a company is converting its debt and equity into profits. We want companies that can do a lot with a little. By looking at the five-year range, we can start to gauge both the power and the consistency of a company's profit engine.
5-Year Sales Growth
5-Year EPS Growth
5-Year Analyst Estimates
5-Year ROIC Range
Seaboard (ASE: SEB)
3.1% / 11.4%
Danaher (NYS: DHR)
7.6% / 11.6%
Raven Industries (NAS: RAVN)
21.3% / 27.8%
3M (NYS: MMM)
15.4% / 21.6%
Carlisle Companies (NYS: CSL)
9.0% / 12.0%
Standex International (NYS: SXI)
5.7% / 11%
Siemens AG (NYS: SI)
5.2% / 9.7%
Source: S&P Capital IQ. NM = not meaningful; EPS growth that is NM results from losses during the period. N/A = not applicable; analyst estimates that are N/A result from lack of analyst coverage.
Use the table above as a first step to help you generate ideas for your own further research. Once you identify stocks worth a closer look, the following three steps will help you further assess their growth prospects:
Carefully study the table for possible danger signs, such as high sales growth but low EPS growth, analyst growth expectations significantly trailing past growth, and low ROIC figures. Then follow the trail. For example, I'd want to dig into why Carlisle's EPS growth is negative if I was interested in the stock. On the flip side, I'm intrigued by Raven's group-leading EPS growth rate and its strong ROIC figures.
Find out how the company achieved its prior growth: organically, or via acquisition? Can it sustain that previous growth? For example, Danaher's history of acquisitions should be factored in, although it may not necessarily be a negative if you believe Danaher can integrate new businesses successfully.
Pay attention to how management plans to implement its growth plans. Does its strategy seem prudent and plausible to you?
Remember: The more profitable, efficient, and predictable growth a company can achieve, the more we investors should be willing to pay.
Learn more about any of the stocks that interest you by adding them to our My Watchlist tool. You'll get access to all the latest Motley Fool analysis, organized by company.
At the time thisarticle was published Anand Chokkaveludoesn't own shares of any company mentioned.You can follow his thoughts onTwitter.Motley Fool newsletter serviceshave recommended buying shares of 3M.Motley Fool newsletter serviceshave recommended creating a diagonal call position in 3M. Try any of our Foolish newsletter servicesfree for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe thatconsidering a diverse range of insightsmakes us better investors. The Motley Fool has adisclosure policy.