Lockheed Martin: Creating or Destroying Value?

Updated

I'm highly skeptical about the economic value of most share repurchase programs. To see why, look at the following graph of the total buyback dollar amount for the companies in the S&P 500, compared to the average price of the index on a quarterly basis:

anImage
anImage

Source: Standard & Poor's.

Share buybacks for the S&P 500 accelerated in the second half of 2004, culminating in a sharp spike during the first two quarters of 2007 -- just as the stock market was peaking. Conversely, when stocks traded at bargain prices during the worst of the crisis, share buybacks dried up. Then, as stocks became more expensive during the rally that began in March 2009, companies once more became happy to step up the dollar amounts spent on share repurchases.

Still, not all buyback programs hurt shareholders. In order to praise smart capital allocators and shame those who fritter away shareholder capital, I've decided to evaluate individual share repurchase programs. Today, I'm looking at the new program established by defense contractor Lockheed Martin (NYS: LMT) .

How much, for how long?
The $2.5 billion increase in Lockheed's share buyback authorization replaces an interim $1 billion increase announced on Aug. 23. The original $3 billion buyback program was initiated in October 2010. The company is placing no restrictions on when it will buy shares, or in what amounts.

How cheap is the stock?
Lockheed Martin's announcement doesn't specifically mention the share price as one of factors that will determine its ability to spend its authorization. That's a shame, because the relationship between price paid and intrinsic value will determine whether the share repurchases are compounding or destroying shareholder wealth. Just how cheap (or expensive) are the shares right now? Based on its price-to-earnings ratio, Lockheed Martin trades at the bottom of the pack with regard to four of its peers:

Company

Forward P/E

Boeing (NYS: BA)

13.0

United Technologies (NYS: UTX)

12.5

Textron (NYS: TXT)

11.6

Lockheed Martin

9.3

General Dynamics (NYS: GD)

7.7

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

Is this a smart use of shareholder capital?
Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings multiple lies in the bottom quintile compared to the company's industry peers and its own five-year history, and in the middle of the range compared to all companies in the S&P 500. With shares trading at 9.3 times its earnings-per-share estimate for the next 12 months, the share buyback program looks like an acceptable use of shareholder capital at these prices, but Lockheed's competitor General Dynamics is more interesting. It's worth tracking the shares of both, and you can do that with our free application, My Watchlist.

Companies can't misallocate the cash they return to shareholders. The Motley Fool's best analysts have identified great companies that let you decide what to do with your profits in our special free report, "13 High-Yielding Stocks to Buy Today."

At the time thisarticle was published Fool contributorAlex Dumortierholds no position in any company mentioned.Click hereto see his holdings and a short bio. You can follow himon Twitter. The Motley Fool owns shares of General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, and Textron. Try any of our Foolish newsletter servicesfree for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe thatconsidering a diverse range of insightsmakes us better investors. The Motley Fool has adisclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2011 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Advertisement