Clinton has 90 percent chance of winning: Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation

Before you go, we thought you'd like these...
Before you go close icon

NEW YORK (Reuters) - With hours to go before Americans vote, Democrat Hillary Clinton has about a 90 percent chance of defeating Republican Donald Trump in the race for the White House, according to the final Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project.

Her chances are roughly similar to last week's odds, and any upset by Trump on Tuesday depends on an unlikely combination of turnouts of white, black and Hispanic voters in six or seven states, according to the survey released on Monday.

Related: 10 ways the election costs Americans -- big time

11 PHOTOS
10 hidden ways elections cost Americans big time
See Gallery
10 hidden ways elections cost Americans big time

'I VOTED' STICKERS

Plenty of people sport "I Voted" stickers proudly after returning from their polling place on Election Day. There is no harm in showing pride for performing a civic duty, but those stickers aren't free -- they cost about 15 cents each. While there are no records on how many state and municipal governments use them, if one were given to each of America's 200 million registered voters, taxpayers would dole out about $30 million. In the 2012 election, California's Santa Clara County saved taxpayers $90,750 just by leaving the stickers out of mail-in ballots, according to a local NBC news report.

(Photo by Pat Greenhouse/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

INAUGURATIONS

From smoked bison and lobster to Champagne and caviar, inaugurations are expensive affairs, tending to keep pace with the rate of inflation: President George W. Bush's 2005 inauguration cost roughly $158 million. President Barack Obama's first inauguration, in 2009, cost $170 million. His second, in 2013, cost about $180 million, Slate estimated. Presidents and their parties are responsible for raising money for the bashes, but taxpayers are on the hook for the cost of such things as security and transportation, which can account for much of the overall expense -- about $124 million for Obama's first.

(MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)

CONVENTIONS

The pageantry of major party nominating conventions almost rivals the extravagance of inaugurations, but since a recent act of Congress, paying for them is up to the political parties -- except, that is, for an evenly divided $100 million in security costs. It makes for a barrage of influence-peddling accusations as the parties cozy up to deep-pocketed donors to finance the galas in exchange for access to movers and shakers. The latest Republican convention in Cleveland cost $71 million, compared with $65 million for the Democrats in Philadelphia -- without the taxpayers' security bill.

(SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)

ELECTION LAWSUITS

With elections come lawsuits, and taxpayers pay to bring them and defend against them. The state of Texas spent five years and $3.5 million in taxpayer money defending voter ID laws that were ultimately struck down. That bill soars to more than $8 million when including suits challenging redistricting efforts by the same Texas legislature. Virginia spent $3.7 million to fight three redistricting lawsuits and a voter ID challenge of its own. A local election for tax commissioner that challenged ballot labeling in DeKalb, Georgia, required taxpayers to pony up $300 an hour in fees for two lawyers, who would collectively bill the municipality$4,800 per eight-hour workday.

(Hailshadow via Getty Images)

PRIMARIES

Primary elections collectively cost state taxpayers more than $400 million in 2012, according to the nonpartisan Independent Voter Project group, and much of that total was spent on "closed" primaries, in which only registered party members can participate. But all citizens share the cost equally, meaning some 26.3 million voters don't participate in elections they pay for.

(Photo by Lane Turner/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

VOTER PURGES

Voter purges are among the most controversial pitfalls of modern elections, and that can make them costly. Like voter ID laws, voter purges tend to be initiated by Republicans sounding the alarm about fraud, with Democrats and others calling them disenfranchisement without evidence. (Claims of a Brooklyn voter purge being used to hobble Bernie Sanders' run for president shows Democrats aren't immune, though.) After the expense of the initial effort -- Florida Gov. Rick Scott spent about $52,000 on a purge in 2012, PolitiFact found -- come lawsuits such as one filed in Ohio after the removal of 2 million voters over five years. No matter who wins, lawsuits are expensive, as so is the cost of reinstating people taken off the rolls if a suit is lost.

(Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

RECOUNTS

Close elections are often contested in recounts, and taxpayers pay handsomely to ensure the true will of the voters is enforced. The most controversial and consequential recount in modern political history -- the 2000 Florida recount between presidential hopefuls George W. Bush and Al Gore -- was also one of the most expensive: $25,000 a day in Palm Beach County alone, county officials said. But even the price of lesser-known recounts can add up quickly. A Pew report estimates that a 2004 gubernatorial recount in Washington state cost taxpayers more than $1.16 million.

(PaulMaguire via Getty Images)

VOTING MACHINE UPDATES

Results of the chaotic 2000 presidential election in Florida were up in the air for weeks, introducing the phrase "hanging chad" to the lexicon as shorthand for an unreliable voting system. Precincts quickly invested in new voting machine technology, but by now it's aging or obsolete. Millions of Americans will vote this year using machines that may have been built before the debut of Myspace. Replacements will be expensive: an estimated $2,500 and $3,000 for each new electronic voting machine, according to theNational Conference of State Legislatures. An alternative is optical scanners that read paper ballots. They have a higher upfront cost of $2,500 to $5,000, but each polling station may need only one.

(lisafx via Getty Images)

FEDERAL VOTING LAWS

 

Starting with the Civil Rights era in the 1960s and continuing through the 1990s and 2000s, the federal government instituted a series of laws compelling states to make it easier to cast a ballot. In 1993, a "motor voter" law required motor vehicle departments to offer voter registration, and a 2002 Help America Vote Act required states to consolidate and centralize registration databases. There is no uniform system of calculating how much each law has cost each state, but one thing is certain: The taxpayer foots the bill.

(Fotosearch via Getty Images)

RECALLS

Sometimes voters decide they don't want to wait until the next election to throw an official out of office, and a recall vote is taken. Recalls are divisive, unpredictable, and thankfully rare -- but they are always expensive. The failed 2012 recall of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker cost the state more than $14 million. One of the most controversial recalls in history, which replaced Gray Davis with Arnold Schwarzenegger as the governor of California in 2003, cost a staggering $66 million.

(Hero Images via Getty Images)

of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE
SHOW CAPTION +
HIDE CAPTION

The former secretary of state was leading Trump by about 45 percent to 42 percent in the popular vote, and was on track to win 303 votes in the Electoral College to Trump's 235, clearing the 270 needed for victory, the survey found.

Trump's chances rest with his performance in Florida, Michigan, North Carolina and Ohio, which were too close to call on Sunday, when polling ended, and Pennsylvania, where Clinton enjoyed a slim lead of three percentage points. For Trump to win, he will have to take most of those states.

Any combination of two losses in the three states of Florida, Michigan and Pennsylvania would almost assuredly result in a Clinton victory. At the same time, Trump must hold onto the traditionally Republican state of Arizona, where the race has drawn close, and hope that independent candidate Evan McMullin does not claim another Republican bastion, Utah.

To win, Trump needs higher turnout among Republican white voters than that which materialized in 2012, a drop-off in ballots by African-American voters and a smaller-than-predicted increase in Hispanic voters, the project showed.

CLUES TO THE OUTCOME

North Carolina, one of the first states to report results on Tuesday night, might provide clues to the outcome. If Clinton wins the state, it probably means African Americans are turning out to vote at a similar rate to 2012, when President Barack Obama beat Republican Mitt Romney by four points nationally. Romney won North Carolina by two points.

The States of the Nation poll found that early votes have been cast evenly between Trump and Clinton in North Carolina. Trump enjoyed a slim one-point advantage among all likely voters, 47 percent to Clinton's 46. He had a 30 percentage point lead among white voters, while Clinton led by about 85 points among black voters.

Florida, with its 29 electoral college votes, is crucial to Trump. If Clinton wins Florida, she just needs to win one of the three big swing states of Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania while Trump would have to win all three. If he wins Florida, Trump still must win both Ohio and Michigan or hope for an upset in Pennsylvania.

According to the project, Clinton enjoys the tiniest of leads in Florida, 48 percent to 47. Clinton leads Trump by 75 points among black voters and has about a 20 point lead among Hispanics. But Trump enjoys a 30 point lead among likely white voters. Clinton's success in Florida depends on heavy turnout among black voters. Without it, the race becomes razor-thin, even with a large increase in Hispanic ballots.

Michigan and Ohio were too close to call on Sunday, according to the project. Clinton's support is more solid in Pennsylvania. Still, a surge of white Republican voters combined with a drop in turnout among black Democrats could be enough to tilt Ohio and Michigan to Trump and put Pennsylvania in play.

If Trump remains in contention on Tuesday night after the eastern swing states have been decided, eyes will turn to Arizona. Trump led Clinton by five points on Sunday, but Arizona had moved steadily toward Clinton in recent weeks, according to the project. It is also a state where higher Hispanic turnout could tip the result in Clinton's favor.

If Trump is in a position to win after Arizona, he could still be tripped up by Utah, where McMullin has remained a contender to the end.

Opinion polls have Trump up by five points or more in Utah. A McMullin upset could set up a low-probability scenario where neither Clinton or Trump reaches the 270 Electoral College votes needed to win. The election would then be decided by the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives, where lawmakers would have a three-way choice among Trump, Clinton and McMullin, a Utah native and former CIA operative.

The States of the Nation project is a survey of about 15,000 people every week in all 50 states plus Washington, D.C. State by state results are available by visiting http://www.reuters.com/statesofthenation/

Read Full Story

Sign up for Breaking News by AOL to get the latest breaking news alerts and updates delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to our other newsletters

Emails may offer personalized content or ads. Learn more. You may unsubscribe any time.

From Our Partners