5 best cities for going car-free

Before you go, we thought you'd like these...
The 9 Worst Cities for Commuters

There's ample evidence that walkable neighborhoods breed safer, healthier, and more democratic constituencies. And even in cities with high levels of smog — here's looking at you, Los Angeles — studies show that the health benefits of walking or cycling or recreation or as a means of commuting far outweigh the negative health risks associated with breathing in air pollution. What's more, when city dwellers opt to walk or cycle instead of relying on gas guzzlers, overall air pollution levels can be reduced. It's a win-win-win.

You don't need a car to get around these U.S. cities:

6 PHOTOS
Best cities for going car-free
See Gallery
Best cities for going car-free

1. Boston

Photo via Getty

2. New York City

Photo via Getty

3. Washington DC

Photo via Getty

4. San Francisco 

Photo via Getty

5. Detroit

Photo via Getty

of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE
SHOW CAPTION +
HIDE CAPTION

1. Boston

Nicknamed America's Walking City, Boston's relatively small footprint is dense with small neighborhoods, each with a unique character and a smattering of restaurants, shops, and convenience stores. That is to say that most Bostonians can complete their daily errands without ever putting the key in the ignition. Boston is also a city where owning a car, in many cases, costs more than it's worth. Take, for example, these tandem, uncovered parking spaces in the high-end Beacon Hill neighborhood. For about a half million dollars, they can be yours. No, this isn't a one-time fluke in pricing. That's actually the going rate. A pair of parking spots on the same street sold for $560,000 at an auction in 2013.

2. New York

The city that never sleeps — Manhattan, in particular — is as pedestrian-friendly as they come. With sidewalks, bike lanes, buses, and subway routes galore, New York brings amenities such as markets, shops, workplaces, medical centers, and gyms in close proximity to the apartments and condos where people live. The city also has easy street crossings and long block lengths, making for more pleasurable pedestrian routes. There is, however, room for improvement. Manhattan is by far the most walkable of New York's boroughs, but it accounts for just 8% of the city's population. Other boroughs aren't actually all that walkable. In the Bronx, neighborhood decline and disinvestment in public transit has made walking around some neighborhoods difficult and less enticing. In truth, the real walkability winner here is Manhattan, and not all of New York City.

3. Washington, D.C.

Much of the nation's capital has walkable zones where residential and retail spaces are in close proximity. And, unlike New York, these zones are evenly distributed between downtown areas and the suburbs. That means it's not just the heart of the city that's walkable, but the outskirts, as well.

4. San Francisco

The Golden Gate City was built on 42 hills — terrain that can make for treacherous gear shifting. And while all those hills will do a number on your calf muscles, there's truly no better way to get around San Francisco's densely populated districts. That's because a quarter of the 49 square-mile city's office, retail, and multi-family rental space is located within the bounds of walkable neighborhoods. And while it's possible to break out of these neighborhood walkability zones and trek the entire city by foot, it's not exactly the fastest or most practical method of getting around. Alas, every city has its walkability limits.

5. Detroit

Oddly enough, you can get around Motor City just fine by foot — no motor required. In fact, these days pedestrian-friendly projects are sprouting up all over Detroit. And it's not just for the sake of recreation. About a quarter of all households citywide lack access to a motor vehicle. New walking path projects can help many in this demographic commute to and from the places they need to go, such as work, the grocery store, and school. And since you can't walk everywhere, new bike paths are surfacing, as well. Whereas Detroit had no bike lanes a decade ago, there are now nearly 200 of them.

Now see the U.S. cities with the worst traffic:

11 PHOTOS
US cities with the worst traffic
See Gallery
US cities with the worst traffic

1. Los Angeles

41 percent extra travel time

2. San Francisco

36 percent extra travel time

3. New York City

33 percent extra travel time

4. Seattle

31 percent extra travel time

5. San Jose

30 percent extra travel time

6. Honolulu

29 percent extra travel time

7. Miami

28 percent extra travel time

8. Washington D.C.

26 percent extra travel time

9. Portland

26 percent extra travel time

10. Chicago

26 percent extra travel time

of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE
SHOW CAPTION +
HIDE CAPTION

What other cities are good for going car-free? Share with us!

More From Wise Bread:
It Bears Repeating - Driving Slower Saves Money
The good life on less energy--even in the US
Did your car break down? Check for recalled parts and fix it for free!

Read Full Story

Find a Home

Buy
Rent
Value
Powered by Zillow

People are Reading