'Disgusting double standard': Outrage over FDA's move to end ban on gay/bisexual blood donors

Before you go, we thought you'd like these...
12 PHOTOS
FDA ends ban on gay blood donors
See Gallery
'Disgusting double standard': Outrage over FDA's move to end ban on gay/bisexual blood donors
The FDA lifting the gay/bisexual men ban on blood donors is great. But the deferral rule is a disgusting double standard.
This FDA statement is straight out of an evangelical fever dream: being gay isn't the sin, but being a well-adjusted adult who has sex is
@SladeHV being MSM is still the biggest risk factor for HIV, and is a key part of a behavioral screen.
@SladeHV the FDA didn't make up the idea that HIV incidence is approx. 30x higher among gay men than the whole population.
@SladeHV but there's no civil right to give blood, and the statement that someone has elevated risk factors for a disease is not an insult.
@jbarro half-true: it is not my right, but I can still be insulted and be made to less than
i'm sure a lot of gay men are going to abstain for a year just so they can give blood. that's totally a logical approach, fda, well done.
Dear @nytimes, Let’s be responsible tweeters. The FDA lift on gay men giving blood is ONLY for those who are celibate. #Homophobia reigns.
Exciting that I can now donate my gay blood just as long as I stop acting gay.
Sexual orientation has NOTHING to do with one’s ability to donate blood. NOTHING.
You can't have sex with your husband for year if you want to donate blood. #ridiculous #homophobic #DoesOralCount?
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE
SHOW CAPTION +
HIDE CAPTION


By RYAN GORMAN

The FDA announced Tuesday a recommendation to lift the lifetime ban on blood donations for men who have sex with men, but with a caveat.

Federal officials have banned gay and bisexual men from donating blood for 31 years. The recommendation to end the practice was met with outrage after it was revealed men who had sex with men in the past year would still be barred.

The lifetime ban was enacted in the throes of the 1980's American AIDS epidemic to protect the blood supply. Many feel it is no longer necessary.

An end to the blanket ban has long been sought by gay rights activists, but replacing it with a request that men abstain from ex with other men solely for the purpose of donating blood only further infuriated the LGBT population.

"The one-year deferral policy is still rooted in an outdated, insulting vision of gay men as diseased, promiscuous lechers," wrote Slate columnist Mark Joseph Stern.

"A gay man in a decades-long monogamous relationship with his husband will be forbidden from donating blood."

Other reactions to the move were less than positive.

"FDA ban reminds me how much I hate work blood drives," tweeted Washington Post social media editor Michael Gold. The tweet was quickly deleted.

Slade Sohmer, head of news for Whisper, called the news "bulls**t."

"This FDA statement is straight out of an evangelical fever dream: being gay isn't the sin, but being a well-adjusted adult who has sex is," he continued.

New York Times reporter Josh Barro argued to Sohmer that men who have sex with men are the biggest risk factor for HIV.

"The FDA didn't make up the idea that HIV incidence is approx. 30x higher among gay men than the whole population," insisted Barro, adding that there is no civil right to donate blood.

"Half-true, replied Sohmer. "It is not my right, but I can still be insulted and be made to [feel] less than [human]."

Politico reporter Tony Romm agreed: "I'm sure a lot of gay men are going to abstain for a year just so they can give blood. that's totally a logical approach, FDA, well done."

Twitter user Mikayla Beyer called the deferral rule a "disgusting double standard."

The FDA has only recommended the change, it has yet to be made into a policy.

Revisiting The Gay Blood Ban In The U.S.

Related links:
Should you be taking a preventative HIV pill?
How the world of LGBT nightlife became a 'church' for outcasts
HIV / AIDS: Stories Of Hope And Survival
Read Full Story

People are Reading