nb_cid nb_clickOther -tt-nb this.style.behavior='url(#default#homepage)';this.setHomePage('http://www.aol.com/?mtmhp=acm50ieupgradebanner_112313 network-banner-empty upgradeBanner
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
AOL Favorites

Israeli tactic to stop soldier capture criticized


Mideast Israel Captured Soldiers

JERUSALEM (AP) -- A tactic that allows overwhelming fire to stop the capture of soldiers - even at the risk of killing them - is facing criticism after its use in the Gaza war killed some 100 Palestinians.

The military used the "Hannibal Procedure" after soldiers feared militants had captured an officer, unleashing heavy shelling on the southern Gaza town of Rafah. Now, a group is calling on the military to abandon the practice, saying it puts captured soldiers at unreasonable risk and can lead to civilian deaths.

In an army with a strong ethos of "no soldier left behind," there is a near obsession with preventing the abduction of Israeli troops, in part because past cases have ended in painful, lopsided prisoner exchanges after years of protracted negotiations. New recruits learn that if they see a soldier being captured and rushed away in a car, they should shoot at the vehicle to stop its progress, even if it risks the soldier's life.

The "Hannibal Procedure" was designed in the mid-1980s by Yossi Peled, then head of Israel's Northern Command, after Hezbollah guerrillas captured two soldiers in southern Lebanon.

The actual order was drafted along with two of his top staff officers, Col. Gabi Ashkenazi, who later became the Israeli military chief, and Col. Yaakov Amidror, who recently ended a term as Israel's national security adviser. Hannibal was a legendary military commander who battled the ancient Romans, though officials say the name was selected randomly by a computer.

Peled declined to comment, but Amidror stood behind a rationale he said was often misinterpreted. He said it gives young soldiers on the ground clear guidelines for such a situation.

"The order is that you cannot kill the soldier, but you can endanger him. A soldier in that situation knows he is in danger anyway," he said. "How is it any different than giving a soldier an order to charge forward into live fire? You are also putting his life in danger that way. That's what soldiers do."

However, its application in the Gaza war has angered critics who say it may have led to the deaths of scores of Palestinians on Aug. 1, when Israeli soldiers feared militants had captured Lt. Hadar Goldin.

Hamas fire killed Goldin and two other Israeli soldiers near Rafah, along Gaza's southern border with Egypt, shortly after an internationally brokered cease-fire took effect.

According to Israeli media reports, three bodies were found at the scene shortly after the ambush, but upon closer inspection troops realized that one of them was a Hamas militant disguised in an Israeli uniform - raising fears that Hamas had captured Goldin.

That's when "Hannibal" allegedly went into effect, with Israel unleashing a massive barrage of airstrikes and artillery fire aimed at blocking any potential escape routes of the kidnappers. Defying protocol, a fellow officer rushed into one of the tunnels and found some personal effects belonging to Goldin that helped the military later rule him dead.

The military would not officially confirm whether "Hannibal" was enacted after Goldin's disappearance, but multiple officials say the rare order was given. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to journalists.

The heavy shelling leveled the area in Rafah, killing some 100 Palestinians, Palestinian health officials say. They could not offer a breakdown of the number of civilians and militants killed.

The Association for Civil Rights in Israel, a prominent rights group, asked the government this week to strike down the doctrine and investigate its use.

"A protocol that puts the life of the captured soldier in jeopardy to thwart a kidnapping is fundamentally unacceptable," ACRI wrote to Israel's attorney general on Monday. "Implementing this protocol in populated areas, wherein the soldier and his captors are surrounded by a civilian population that is not taking part in hostilities, is strictly prohibited."

Israel's Justice Ministry declined to comment, merely saying it received the letter.

The fear of being captured runs deep in Israeli society, where military service is mandatory for most Jewish males. Islamic militant groups have put a premium on capturing soldiers. When they have succeeded, they have not extended international prisoner of war rights, preventing visits from the Red Cross and keeping word of their captives' status secret.

Asa Kasher, a philosophy professor who authored the military's official code of conduct in the 1990s, said the "Hannibal Procedure" has been grossly misunderstood and strikes a delicate balance between protecting the lives of soldiers and carrying out military responsibilities. Much of the directive remains classified, but Kasher stressed the conventional wisdom of a "dead soldier being better than a captive soldier" was a fallacy.

"That is just an awful saying and totally untrue. It goes against every value of the" Israeli military, he said.

However, Tamar Feldman, an ACRI lawyer, said the practice violates the potential captive's human rights. When employed in a crowded area like Gaza, it raised even more questions.

"A command that subjugates the life of a soldier to an unknown political gain ... is both cynical and revolting," she wrote. "Activating this protocol in the heart of an urban and civilian environment is particularly grave; it shakes the foundations of law and morality and must be absolutely condemned."


Follow Aron Heller on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/aronhellerap .

© 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Israeli Service Obligations
Conflict in Israel
Political Debate about Israel
Israeli Military Ranks
Civilian Safety in Israel
Number of Deaths in Gaza

Join the discussion

1000|Char. 1000  Char.
jgesselberty August 13 2014 at 8:19 AM

The only criticism I am seeing is that of the liberal, terrorist supporting, anti-semitic, media and their progressive followers.

Flag Reply +99 rate up
14 replies
user406324 August 13 2014 at 8:40 AM

AOL who cares? You forgot to mention the highly acceptable tactic or so it seems that you feel it is of suicide bombers used by Hamas. You are a joke with your bias and an embarrassment to journalism.....

Flag Reply +89 rate up
8 replies
hcduley August 13 2014 at 7:47 AM

You ass holes. They are fighting a war not having a picnic. If Palestinians get killed tough ****. Where the hell were all the bleeding heart people when we fire bomb Germany and Japan. Why don't the Palestian civilians conspire and give up the terrorists to the Israeli army on the QT?

Flag Reply +78 rate up
8 replies
mldinc@aol.com August 13 2014 at 8:05 AM

OK, so let's blame Israel, now that Hamas (Muslims) has had their ass kicked. That way "The Islamic Thing." can move on to Iraq and kill more Christians, or blow up a jumbo jet over Lockerbee Scotland, or murder 3,000 people in 3 hours in NYC, or shoot our soldiers at Fort Hood, or kill more than 200 children in an elementary school in Russia. Muslims, Muslims, Muslims, Murderers, Murderers, Murderers!!! Putin knows how to deal with Muslims, we don't.

Flag Reply +75 rate up
4 replies
Alton August 13 2014 at 8:19 AM

Sure, play by the rules with people who will cut your head off when captured. That makes sense. Palestinians want it both ways and both are their ways....to bad the US doesn't adapt some of the Israeli actions rather then trade 5 terrorist for one deserter.

Flag Reply +74 rate up
7 replies
Milton August 13 2014 at 7:54 AM

Although an understandably controversial policy, the facts are that the soldier is either 1) tortured and killed (which dying in an attempted rescue might be considered preferable) or 2) traded for 1000's of terrorist who in turn will kill who knows how many more Israelis.

Flag Reply +58 rate up
5 replies
flatheadjck August 13 2014 at 8:21 AM

Close with and destroy the enemy. That is the mission of every soldier. Why is it rules are applied to Israel and yet hamas is not chastised for their COWARDLY tactics?

Flag Reply +56 rate up
4 replies
ML August 13 2014 at 8:05 AM

go Israel

Flag Reply +52 rate up
3 replies
sunshinye August 13 2014 at 8:12 AM

It seems no matter what Israel do they are always being critized. You have to realize they are in a war that they did not started, with Hamas who do not care how Israel or Gaza people he will kill. The Israel people are fighting for their lives and we can not even imagine what they are going through. Hamas do not care about life for anyone. He knows if the people in Gaza were to criticize him they will be kill. The people in Gaza are caught in the middle and no, war is not easy but what do you expect Israel to do. I truly believe if the Gaza people had a chance to be free and live in Israel at least they would be treated like human beings. Hamas has his military headquarters built right under the Gaza Hospital. What a place to put the Gaza people in danger. This should tell you he does not care about anyone. Israel has the right to use whatever means to stop this monster.

Flag Reply +45 rate up
3 replies
fox12ga August 13 2014 at 8:20 AM

Yea so it killed a lot of muslims Whats your point Isn't that what their trying to do.

Flag Reply +29 rate up
4 replies
aol~~ 1209600


More From Our Partners