nb_cid nb_clickOther -tt-nb this.style.behavior='url(#default#homepage)';this.setHomePage('http://www.aol.com/?mtmhp=acm50ieupgradebanner_112313 network-banner-empty upgradeBanner
14
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
Video
Video
AOL Favorites
Favorites
Menu

In San Francisco real estate, $1M won't buy much



By LISA LEFF

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - San Francisco Association of Realtors President Betty Taisch has two words of advice for those who want to live here and think $1 million will buy them their dream house: Think again.

In the souped-up world of San Francisco real estate, where the median selling price for houses and condominiums last month hit seven figures for the first time, the cool million that would fetch a mansion on a few acres elsewhere will now barely cover the cost of an 800-square foot starter home that needs work and may or may not include private parking.

Taisch, a veteran broker who is used to managing her clients' expectations, has experienced first-hand the heartbreak and hair-pulling inherent to house-hunting in what she considers one of the world's "most desirable, fabulous cities." It's also in the most expensive market in the country by several measures, according to recent surveys.

Taisch put her professional skills to work this summer on behalf of her adult son and his family, who had outgrown their one-bedroom apartment. After three unsuccessful offers, they ended up paying $913,000 for a two-bedroom, one-bath house with an outdated kitchen, a yard that can charitably be called overgrown, and a big basement that Taisch counts as its most attractive feature.

"It certainly is a milestone. It's like, 'Wow!'''," she said of the city's new million-dollar median. "Everybody thinks San Francisco is all Pacific Heights Victorians, and it's not. There are many areas of the city that are just normal, single-family homes that are small and not posh at all."

The technology's industry's rapid growth coupled with 49-square-mile San Francisco's constrained supply of housing is a big part of the story behind the city's ascension to a rarified real estate bracket already occupied by New York City, but Silicon Valley wealth also is stoking the market in the greater San Francisco Bay Area, according to Andrew LePage, an analyst with CoreLogic DataQuick, a real estate research firm in Irvine, California.

Between April and June, the Bay Area saw a record number of homes and condos going for $1 million and above, and they accounted for one-quarter of all sales in the region, CoreLogic DataQuick said in a report released Thursday. During the same three-month period, six of the Bay Area's nine counties set records for the number of homes and condos selling for over $2 million, as did California as a whole, the report said.

"The robust tech economy and the overall economy mean the Bay Area has been doing better than most for years now," LePage said. "It already was expensive, and a lot of these high-end markets weren't hammered as hard during the downturn because they weren't as exposed to subprime mortgages, so they had less ground to recover in the first place."

George Limperis, an agent with Paragon Real Estate Group in San Francisco, agrees that freshly minted technology millionaires who can afford to bid up a property until they win it with an all-cash offer are helping to drive up demand. But unlike during the city's first tech boom in the late 1990s, the buyers prepared to lay down more than $1 million on a fixer-upper in a neighborhood within walking distance of shops and restaurants also include Asian investors and retirees from other major cities who already are accustomed to skyscraper prices for shoebox dwellings, Limperis said.

"It feels like a very different city than it certainly did even 15 years ago. There is money coming from so many places now," he said. "So many of these buyers today, they have lived in London, they have lived in Hong Kong, they have lived in New York, and to them these prices are parallel. We can't compare San Francisco with median housing prices even elsewhere in California because this is an international level we are dealing with."

Limperis this month represented the sellers of a 1,200-square-foot, two-bedroom home "in poor condition" that had been in their family for generations. Located on a commercial street in San Francisco's Noe Valley neighborhood, an area prized for its modest Victorians, the home was listed for a little under $1.2 million. By the end of its first week on the market, 10 people had submitted all-cash offers. The house sold for $1.8 million to a developer who plans to convert it into condos.

"Everyone is aghast at what these things sell for, but as long as the economy keeps going it like it does, these numbers do make sense," Limperis said.

Being prepared to go well over a home's asking price and willing to sacrifice style or a second bathroom are some of the pointers that Kelly Kang, a colleague of Limperis' at Paragon, gives to buyers.

Kang just represented a young couple with a child who were interested in a 756-square-foot, two-bedroom, one-bath row house built in 1950 in a newly hot neighborhood near a park and public transit that was listed at a little more than $1 million after having sold for $710,000 five years ago. The couple offered $1.2 million and wrote a "love letter" about the house explaining why it was just right for their family. They got the house.

"People that want to stay in San Francisco really love the city, so what they are buying is the city more than the property," Kang said.

Join the discussion

1000|Char. 1000  Char.
threetoyo August 01 2014 at 7:01 AM

To many gays there for me, I can do with out that type.

Flag Reply +13 rate up
10 replies
iamadonkey August 01 2014 at 8:42 AM

high taxes. Lousy weather. Full of libs. You can keep it. Would rather live in Dungheap, Idaho than there

Flag Reply +12 rate up
12 replies
jpfmtka August 01 2014 at 9:41 AM

So predictable, criticism from every corner from the populations who could never even dream of a 1M home. The sour grapes are a deeper green when tainted with envy.

Flag Reply +9 rate up
2 replies
MICHAEL jpfmtka August 01 2014 at 10:11 AM

your sooo right. i lived there for 15 yrs and was born across the bay. i love the bay area and the city will always be my home. even tho i lived in this hell hole az. since 95.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
rcsyes jpfmtka August 01 2014 at 12:15 PM

The home you get for one million is like getting a $100,000 home elsewhere. It's all about the location...and guess what...for most people...that location is the worst with the gays, libs, taxes and the big one that is coming soon.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
redrdstr August 01 2014 at 8:28 AM

Who would want to live in that ridiculous place anyway? Nice to visit, but run by whackos, taxes, gas, city ordinances that are crazy, LGBT crowd too much for my stomach. You can have it.

Flag Reply +8 rate up
4 replies
LA is Best August 01 2014 at 10:59 AM

Why would anyone want to live in the perverted city by the bay??

Flag Reply +5 rate up
3 replies
English August 01 2014 at 11:10 AM

A pretty city, but to much city government contol, high prices, people live there that actually vote for Nancy Pelosi, And a higher than normal percentage of the people are flat out ugly.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
1 reply
ibdoowop English August 01 2014 at 3:36 PM

It's normal. the more crowded a city is, the more government regulations. Ask Tokyo or other very heavily populated cities.

It's called civilization. Move to the outskirts of Barstow, Calif. or Lubbock, Texas if you don't want to be bothered by anyone except an occasional rattlesnake, roadrunner or coyote.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
LA is Best August 01 2014 at 11:09 AM

Tony Bennett has a new song out, "I left My Sex Toy In San Francisco"!

Flag Reply +4 rate up
Tom August 01 2014 at 10:01 AM

Used to be a nice place to visit. No more. Certainly not a place for thinking people to live.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
3 replies
likethat389 August 01 2014 at 1:19 PM

How funny are the comments here ? It's like the turnip truck just dropped it's load and they all decided to post about this story. LOL

San Francisco has FAR lower crime rates---murder, rape, robbery---PER CAPITA---than Houston, or Jackson, or Atlanta, or Dallas.

And gee whiz---isn't the housing expensive there because people WANT to live there, which drives up the price, which means people that can afford to live there have money, which means they worked hard, and succeeded----LOL----ALL the things rightwingers SAY they admire and aspire to ?

But it's a Democratic city. With a lot of gays. And there ya go----lol----READ the comments from the rubes here. Crime is lower than a whole lot of " red" cities, real estate values are HIGH, people WANT to live there.......and the commenters are falling over themselves to blast the place........

Flag Reply +4 rate up
1 reply
ibdoowop likethat389 August 01 2014 at 3:38 PM

Love your post and you nailed it.

I got married in The City and I learned back in the 60's to never call it "Frisco."

Flag Reply +1 rate up
BlessedWithABrain August 01 2014 at 11:55 AM

San Francisco is lost. The "Michael's" of the world can have it.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
2 replies
MICHAEL BlessedWithABrain August 01 2014 at 12:11 PM

good, thanks for giving what we already have you religious freak.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
1 reply
coopdabomb MICHAEL August 01 2014 at 5:47 PM

You Tutu looking fool.

Flag 0 rate up
ibdoowop BlessedWithABrain August 01 2014 at 4:01 PM

Where in the world did you come up with such a dumb name:"BlessedWithABrain"?

Your post tells me otherwise.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
aol~~ 1209600

Voting...

More From Our Partners