14
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
Video
Video
AOL Favorites
Favorites
Menu

Beef pollutes more than pork, poultry, study says

By SETH BORENSTEIN

WASHINGTON (AP) - Raising beef for the American dinner table does far more damage to the environment than producing pork, poultry, eggs or dairy, a new study says.

Compared with the other animal proteins, beef produces five times more heat-trapping gases per calorie, puts out six times as much water-polluting nitrogen, takes 11 times more water for irrigation and uses 28 times the land, according to the study, published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Cows are not efficient at converting feed to protein for human consumption, said lead author Gidon Eshel, an environmental physics professor at Bard College in New York.

Eshel used U.S. government figures to calculate air and water emissions and how much water and land were used in the lifetime production of beef, pork, poultry, dairy and eggs. While other studies have looked at the issue, this is one of the most comprehensive pieces of research quantifying and comparing the U.S. environmental costs of different meats and other animal protein.

The beef industry called the study "a gross oversimplification of the complex systems that make up the beef value chain."

Kim Stackhouse, sustainability director at the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, said that the industry has improved its environmental sustainability in recent years and that the United States produces beef with the lowest greenhouse gas emissions of any country.

In the study, pork, poultry, dairy and eggs all had comparable environmental footprints, so close there were no statistically significant differences among them, Eshel said. But cows were off-the-chart different. The study did not look at plants or fish raised for human consumption.

Cows burp major amounts of methane, a greenhouse gas that is dozens of times more potent than carbon dioxide. Their digestive system makes them produce considerably more methane than pigs, chickens or turkeys do, Eshel said. The manure used to grow feed for cows also releases methane, as does their own bodily waste.

Because they are bigger and take longer to put on weight for meat, cows eat more food over their lifetimes than other animals raised for protein.

Nitrogen, from fertilizer runoff, can harm rivers, lakes and bays, causing oxygen-depleted "dead zones." The use of irrigation water is a major issue out West when there are droughts, like the current one in California. So much land used for farming changes the biodiversity of a location, Eshel said.

"It really looks like beef is a lot worse environmentally than these other meats," said Ken Caldeira, an environmental scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science. Caldeira wasn't part of this study, but has a separate study of beef's greenhouse gas footprint around the world, published this month in the journal Climatic Change.

Eshel calculates that the average American who switches from beef to pork would reduce the equivalent of 1,200 pounds of carbon dioxide a year, which is about nine days' worth of the nation's per capita greenhouse gas emissions. The EPA calculates that it is the same as the emissions from 61 gallons of gas or what comes out of the smokestack from burning 580 pounds of coal.

Caldeira said his calculations found that "eating a pound of beef causes more greenhouse warming than burning a gallon of gasoline."

Even though pigs have the reputation for being dirty, the data shows that they "come out pretty clean" when compared to cows, Eshel said.

The message from the study is "whenever possible try to replace beef with other sources of protein from animal sources," said Eshel, who said he doesn't eat meat now but used to raise cattle on a kibbutz in Israel.

Nutrition scientists Marion Nestle at New York University and Malden Nesheim at Cornell University said the study makes sense, was done carefully and is important.

Caldeira, whose study examined livestock and greenhouse gas internationally, found that livestock accounted for 9 percent of the world's total greenhouse gases, and their overall output has increased 51 percent since 1961.

He also found that the developed world - including the U.S. - decreased its carbon emissions from livestock by 23 percent, while the developing world has more than doubled its emissions in that category. So overall greenhouse gases from livestock rose by more than 50 percent.

Countries like the United States are importing beef from developing countries, potentially skewing the results, Eshel said.

Join the discussion

1000|Char. 1000  Char.
Ban Liberal Dementia July 21 2014 at 6:29 PM

Here's a suggestion - how about if the world stops producing liberals and tree huggers who attack everything that is normal? I'd much rather look forward to having a nice steak than I would to hear more blather from the self appointed tree huggers and know it all liberals.

Flag Reply +99 rate up
23 replies
Soul Gates July 21 2014 at 6:38 PM

I just finished a study, I haven't published it yet, but I'll give you the conclusion I reached: Liberals create more hot air with their ridiculous BS and have caused global temps to rise by over 3 degrees in the last couple of decades. I believe my study is just as valid as the one in this article.

Flag Reply +82 rate up
5 replies
crowland503 July 21 2014 at 6:37 PM

Who gives a damn? By these EPA liberals, the animal-soiled pollution, caused by the dinosaurs, should have turned this world into a dead planet prior to 65 million years ago. Certainly, the 30 million buffalos
carved their polluted-footprints into the 19tth Century world. This sounds like a Obama Lie Campaign to manipulate and direct how the American People are to think and behave. If you ask, "Where's the beef?" then you should know that after they came for the cows, then they went after the pigs, turkeys, and chickens!!! What will you do when the NAZI Food Police dictates what you can eat and drink in this secret Obamacare scheme.

Flag Reply +56 rate up
3 replies
partsautomall July 21 2014 at 6:12 PM

somebody actually received a paycheck for this report

Flag Reply +49 rate up
6 replies
planeman10 July 21 2014 at 6:20 PM

I say, get rid of the scientists behind this study. They pollute more than the average cow.

Flag Reply +42 rate up
3 replies
navalphoto July 21 2014 at 6:09 PM

Of course a few million bufallo never did that.

Flag Reply +27 rate up
3 replies
BONNA HEANEY July 21 2014 at 10:53 PM

What a bunch of liberal bull s---!

Flag Reply +26 rate up
2 replies
frank.foreman BONNA HEANEY July 22 2014 at 12:02 AM

Yeah , BS. Are Liberals trying to say they didn't even wheen on mother's milk? Then they are not wheened yet. Nor cimcumsized I'll bet.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
Beverly Doyle BONNA HEANEY July 22 2014 at 11:42 AM

Frank, you and Bonna represent folks who apparently are willfully ignorant. Please go to http://smallplanet.org/books/diet-small-planet. This has been known for quite a while, so really shouldn't be "news." And good luck with any and all job applications, Frank - let us all know what your "Wheening" background does for you.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
KC Clark July 21 2014 at 6:23 PM

alot of BS............

Flag Reply +20 rate up
1 reply
frank.foreman KC Clark July 21 2014 at 11:59 PM

An outhouse has to be tied to these people's arses , so that they can see that they still don't live any different , just because they are off the potee. Like it or not , the human body is one filthy beast. Stop making excuses for it. A human is also an animal.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
lpengrg July 21 2014 at 8:40 PM

And thanks to the morons in our government the corn going in to the alcohol that pollutes our gasoline isn't going to feed. So they have raised the cost of food, just to pollute our fuel.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
1 reply
Protect Our Backs lpengrg July 21 2014 at 10:12 PM

Weird how corn coming out of a cows is a bigger deal than corn coming out of a tail pipe. How about humans that eat corn? Are we next on their agenda to annihilate because we "emit too many toxic gases" through our tail pipes?

Flag Reply +1 rate up
rpthe1 July 21 2014 at 8:27 PM

doesn't dairy come from cows? How can it be better?
I say don't compare food compare factories that burn coal etc.

Flag Reply +3 rate up
aol~~ 1209600

Voting...

More From Our Partners