14
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
Video
Video
AOL Favorites
Favorites
Menu

Justices: Can't make employers cover contraception



By MARK SHERMAN

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ruled Monday that some corporations can hold religious objections that allow them to opt out of the new health law requirement that they cover contraceptives for women.

The justices' 5-4 decision is the first time that the high court has ruled that profit-seeking businesses can hold religious views under federal law. And it means the Obama administration must search for a different way of providing free contraception to women who are covered under objecting companies' health insurance plans.

Contraception is among a range of preventive services that must be provided at no extra charge under the health care law that President Barack Obama signed in 2010 and the Supreme Court upheld two years later.

Two years ago, Chief Justice John Roberts cast the pivotal vote that saved the health care law in the midst of Obama's campaign for re-election. On Monday, dealing with a small sliver of the law, Roberts sided with the four justices who would have struck down the law in its entirety.

Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority opinion. The court's four liberal justices dissented.

The court stressed that its ruling applies only to corporations that are under the control of just a few people in which there is no essential difference between the business and its owners, like the Oklahoma-based Hobby Lobby chain of arts-and-craft stores that challenged the provision.

Alito also said the decision is limited to contraceptives under the health care law. "Our decision should not be understood to hold that an insurance-coverage mandate must necessarily fall if it conflicts with an employer's religious beliefs," Alito said.

He suggested two ways the administration could ensure women get the contraception they want. It could simply pay for pregnancy prevention, he said.

Or it could provide the same kind of accommodation it has made available to religious-oriented, not-for-profit corporations. Those groups can tell the government that providing the coverage violates their religious beliefs. At that point, the groups' insurers or a third-party administrator takes on the responsibility of paying for the birth control.

The accommodation is the subject of separate legal challenges, but the court said Monday that the profit-seeking companies could not assert religious claims in such a situation.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, who was part of the majority, also wrote separately to emphasize that the administration can solve its problem easily. "The accommodation works by requiring insurance companies to cover, without cost sharing, contraception coverage for female employees who wish it," Kennedy said. He said that arrangement "does not impinge on the plaintiffs' religious beliefs."

Houses of worship and other religious institutions whose primary purpose is to spread the faith are exempt from the requirement to offer birth control.

In a dissent she read aloud from the bench, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg called the decision "potentially sweeping" because it minimizes the government's interest in uniform compliance with laws affecting the workplace. "And it discounts the disadvantages religion-based opt outs impose on others, in particular, employees who do not share their employer's religious beliefs," Ginsburg said.

The administration said a victory for the companies would prevent women who work for them from making decisions about birth control based on what's best for their health, not whether they can afford it. The government's supporters pointed to research showing that nearly one-third of women would change their contraceptive if cost were not an issue; a very effective means of birth control, the intrauterine device, can cost up to $1,000.

The contraceptives at issue before the court were the emergency contraceptives Plan B and ella, and two IUDs.

Nearly 50 businesses have sued over covering contraceptives. Some, like those involved in the Supreme Court case, are willing to cover most methods of contraception, as long as they can exclude drugs or devices that the government says may work after an egg has been fertilized. Other companies object to paying for any form of birth control.

There are separate lawsuits challenging the contraception provision from religiously affiliated hospitals, colleges and charities.

A survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation found 85 percent of large American employers already had offered such coverage before the health care law required it.

Most working women will probably see no impact from the ruling, corporate health benefits consultants expect. Publicly traded companies are unlikely to drag religion into their employee benefit plans, said Mark Holloway, director of compliance services at the Lockton Companies, an insurance broker that serves medium-sized and growing employers.

"Most employers view health insurance as a tool to attract and retain employees," said Holloway. "Women employees want access to contraceptive coverage and most employers don't have a problem providing that coverage. It is typically not a high-cost item."

It is unclear how many women potentially are affected by the high court ruling. Hobby Lobby is by far the largest employer of any company that has gone to court to fight the birth control provision.

Oklahoma City-based Hobby Lobby has more than 15,000 full-time employees in more than 600 crafts stores in 41 states. The Greens are evangelical Christians who also own Mardel, a Christian bookstore chain.

The other company is Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. of East Earl, Pa., owned by a Mennonite family and employing 950 people in making wood cabinets.

---

Associated Press writer Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar contributed to this report.

Join the discussion

1000|Characters 1000  Characters
Sandy June 30 2014 at 12:22 PM

Praise God for this victory!!!

Flag Reply +99 rate up
22 replies
kjmooney59 June 30 2014 at 12:28 PM

Good ruling. Birth control is not a medical necessity, it's an individual responsibility. Everyone that wants the right to choose, should have the right to pay for it themselves.

Flag Reply +99 rate up
35 replies
summerctz June 30 2014 at 12:24 PM

LOL...I like the sign one girl is holding in the photo stating "Birth control, not my boss's business", yet she wants them to pay for it.

Flag Reply +99 rate up
46 replies
seabirdsvc June 30 2014 at 12:31 PM

Let see so you get to choose where you work, you get to choose who you have sex with, you get to choose when you have sex, you get the freedom of choice on almost everything in your life BUT yet your employer who takes all the risks of owning and operating a business gets NO choice as to what they want to pay for or not. Uh huh I see so choice is only a one way street. BUY your own birth control it is NOT that expensive!!! Whiners!!

Flag Reply +99 rate up
11 replies
j.pr3 June 30 2014 at 12:25 PM

If you don't want to get pregnant, abstain or buy your own birth control just like everybody has had to do until Ostinko tried to stick his nose in. Shame somebody didn't have that rule 9 months before he was born.

Flag Reply +99 rate up
19 replies
botcheditagain000 June 30 2014 at 12:27 PM

The liberals are extra cranky today.

Flag Reply +96 rate up
13 replies
Mike June 30 2014 at 12:30 PM

"This is a huge win for people of conscious and a stern rebuke for Obama and his HHS Secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, who have repeatedly overstepped their authority and attempted to strip Americans of their precious freedoms .... We are thankful that Obama's tyrannical mandate, which ran rough-shod over our religious freedoms, has been struck down."

Flag Reply +84 rate up
19 replies
cshelled June 30 2014 at 12:24 PM

Hail to the Judges, God, His Son and Life.

Flag Reply +71 rate up
13 replies
NoOneHere2 June 30 2014 at 12:28 PM

one, the supreme court needs term limits, two religions need to pay taxes if they get involve in politics three, what happened to state and religion rule, four, the gop needs NOT run womans lives, four get out and VOTE this year to oust the GOP

Flag +60 rate up
51 replies
patriotcj June 30 2014 at 12:31 PM

Forcing businesses to pay health insurance is ridiculous, unAnerican, and unconstitutional. Let us end this.

Flag Reply +9 rate up
1 reply
Elizabeth patriotcj June 30 2014 at 1:13 PM

I say if these businesses and Catholic hospitals and Pharmacists who want to use religion to NOT CARE for the health of women, should not be licensed. Can you imagine a firefighter or police officer saying they can't help a person or put out a fire because their religion doesn't allow it? They would be kicked off the force immediately. Why do we tolerate health care professional the right to not help women? Answer: because they use women-hating religions to deny women health care and we let them get away with it. Aren't we stupid? No, we accept woman-hating is what the problem is.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
1 reply
hagman3926 Elizabeth June 30 2014 at 6:23 PM

your so wrong

Flag 0 rate up
aol~~ 1209600

Voting...

More From Our Partners