nb_cid nb_clickOther -tt-nb this.style.behavior='url(#default#homepage)';this.setHomePage('http://www.aol.com/?mtmhp=acm50ieupgradebanner_112313 network-banner-empty upgradeBanner
14
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
Video
Video
AOL Favorites
Favorites
Menu

Beastie Boys win $1.7M in copyright case vs. Monster Beverage


By Nate Raymond and Bernard Vaughan

(Reuters) - Beastie Boys' fight for their right to not let Monster Beverage Corp use the hip-hop group's music without their permission resulted in a verdict of $1.7 million on Thursday.

A federal jury in Manhattan issued the verdict on the eighth day of trial in a copyright dispute between members of the Brooklyn-born band and the energy drink maker over songs the band says Monster used without a license in a 2012 promotional video.

The Beastie Boys had sought up to $2.5 million for copyright infringement and false endorsement.

Monster countered that it owed no more than $125,000, calling the case "illogical" and saying an employee had mistakenly believed the company had permission to use the music.

Beastie Boys members Adam Horovitz, or "Ad-Rock," and Michael Diamond, or "Mike D," attended much of the trial and both testified. After the verdict was read, Horovitz hugged his wife, musician Kathleen Hanna.

"We're happy," Horovitz said after the hearing. "We just want to thank the jury."

Reid Kahn, a lawyer for Monster, said the company would appeal.

Filed in August 2012, the lawsuit centered on an online video promoting an annual snowboarding competition the company organizes and sponsors in Canada called "Ruckus in the Rockies."

The video, which Monster uploaded to YouTube, featured the competition and an after-party attended by DJs, including Z-Trip. It included a remix by Z-Trip of Beastie Boys songs, including "Sabotage," "So Watcha Want" and "Make Some Noise."

The four-minute video concluded with a sentence saying "RIP MCA." Adam Yauch, a Beastie Boys member who went by "MCA," died a day before the snowboarding event, after a battle with cancer.

The Beastie Boys complained to Monster in June 2012 and subsequently sued, saying the Corona, California-based company did not have permission to use its music.

"It stole the Beastie Boys' right to say no," Paul Garrity, a lawyer for the band, told jurors at the start of the trial.

Monster acknowledged it had infringed the Beastie Boys' copyrights, but contended it was not done willfully.

"The plaintiffs try to take the undisputed evidence and spin some tale of an insidious corporate conspiracy," Kahn, Monster's lawyer, told jurors Wednesday during closing arguments. (Reporting by Nate Raymond and Bernard Vaughan in New York; editing by Gunna Dickson)

Join the discussion

1000|Char. 1000  Char.
muleskinner07 June 06 2014 at 2:46 PM

You don't need a degree or talent to be a hip hop or rap singer .

Flag Reply +11 rate up
3 replies
geldonski June 06 2014 at 1:30 PM

Hip-Hop IS NOT MUSIC. For these guys to get rich of the trash they perform sure doesn't say a whole hell of a lot about the people that follow them and give them part of their pay day.

Flag Reply +8 rate up
9 replies
jimd8575 June 06 2014 at 4:59 PM

Cant imagine anyone would want a Beastie Boys song bad enough to steal it let alone pay for it. They should be thrilled someone even remembers them!

Flag Reply +6 rate up
Jarred June 06 2014 at 1:41 PM

Yeah, totally fair. Maybe it was an accident but that's what copyright law is for. Also contrary to some people's beliefs on this forum. The Beastie Boys are not just Hip-hop, they are a little of everything. Thats the stuff that breaks down walls and is ultimately why they are such a tremendous success.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
com2pc June 06 2014 at 2:13 PM

Only You Lefty libs would go along with This CRAP.. Its total Bull S_iT.. Beasty boys didnt lose anything for Monster using their crappy Music.. In fact it was Probably the BEST publicity these has beens have had in years.. They should PAY Monster!!
The company said it was inadvertent.. Not done purposely, but by mistake... The company admitted infringement, But did Not agree on this B S and unfair amount..... TOATL B S....

Flag Reply +4 rate up
6 replies
Ghetto Cat June 07 2014 at 3:38 AM

These so-called energy drinks of today a toilet tea. They are embarassed by it. JOLT was a drink but unfortunatly was banned by the wussies. Right along with hoverboards because they were too dangerous for kids. Welcome to the Cyrus-Swift-Bieber generation.

Flag Reply +3 rate up
1 reply
John Albert Walker Ghetto Cat June 08 2014 at 6:23 PM

Jolt Cola was weezled out by the big two companies with taking over-or buying out shelf space in stores-they were limited production company and just could not fight the big dogs--I finally drank my last one in my cache a year ago-GOD I MISS THAT RUSH!!!!

Flag Reply 0 rate up
chibblitz June 06 2014 at 10:11 PM

Good for you Beastie Boys, Monster drink sucks btw, RedBull is much better.

Flag Reply +3 rate up
madddddddddddddd June 06 2014 at 12:42 PM

it seems fair

Flag Reply +2 rate up
petpetdon June 06 2014 at 4:49 PM

Beastie Boys so yesterday and a long, long time ago.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
1 reply
Erne petpetdon June 08 2014 at 7:54 PM

Monster Beverage didn't see it that way.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
Rhonda June 08 2014 at 1:52 PM

Monster is full of it. Everyone who's ever Produced a commercial knows you need to own the sync rights to any music you use, period. I'm sure they thought they could sample and get away with it. The Napster generation at it's best.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
1 reply
notapclib Rhonda June 08 2014 at 2:42 PM

Monster does not have anyone on staff who has ever had any previous experience in producing electronic advertising/media materials.... of course, saying an internet video is "electronic advertising/media" is a stretch... but copy write laws still apply.

Flag Reply +3 rate up
aol~~ 1209600

Voting...

More From Our Partners