'Aliens of sea' provide new insight into evolution

Before you go, we thought you'd like these...

'Aliens of sea' provide new insight into evolution
This March 30, 2014, photo provided by Leonid Moroz shows a species of comb jelly called a Beroe after it swallowed another comb jelly, called a Bolinopsis. Leonid Moroz, a University of Florida neurobiologist, is on a quest to decode the genomic blueprints of fragile marine life, including comb jellies on board the ship where they were caught. (AP Photo/Leonid Moroz)
This handout photo from the University of Florida is a composite showing different views of a comb jelly known as Pleurobrachia bachei as it swims. University of Florida researchers investigated the genes of this and other comb jelly species, and found the mysterious creatures evolved a unique nervous system in a different way than other animals. (AP Photo/University of Florida)
A spotted comb jelly glides through its display at the Monterey Bay Aquarium in Monterey, Calif., Monday, Nov. 25, 2002. In what is a world first, the aquarium is displaying a dozen spotted comb jellies (Leucothea Pulchra), considered one of the most beautiful and complex of all comb jellies. The delicate animals were collected in Monterey Bay and added to the aquarium's innovative Jellies: Living Art special exhibition. (AP Photo/Mike Fiala)
Invertibrate exhibit at the National Zoo ctenophores or comb jellies (also sometimes called sea walnuts because of their walnut-like size and shape). The ctenophore species we exhibit, Mnemiopsis leidyi, is one of two species of comb jellies found in the Chesapeake Bay. These comb jellies have rows of closely spaced cilia combs (short hair-like structures) that beat synchronously to move the animals forward through the water and draw prey organisms into their oral canals. When light hits the moving cilia, rainbow-like colors are refracted, giving the comb jellies a shimmering quality. Ctenophores are commonly confused with jellyfish, but unlike the jellyfish, corals, and sea anemones that make up the Cnidaria phylum, comb jellies do not have stinging cells. (Photo by Joe Elbert/The Washington Post/Getty Images)
warty comb jelly or sea walnut (Mnemiopsis leidyi), Black Sea, Crimea, Ukraine, Eastern Europe
comb jelly
IMG_2953acs comb jellies
IMG_7562cas comb jelly
FILE - This March 29, 2014 file photo shows University of Florida neurobiologist Leonid Moroz pulling a net from the Gulf Stream off the coast of Florida, to examine invertebrate species headed for his unique floating laboratory. New research with mysterious sea creatures called comb jellies suggests nature created more than one way to a nervous system. (AP Photo/Lauran Neergaard, File)

AP Medical Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Exotic sea creatures called comb jellies may reshape how scientists view early evolution - as their genes suggest nature created more than one way to make a nervous system.

These beautiful but little-known translucent animals often are called "aliens of the sea," for good reason. Somehow, they rapidly regenerate lost body parts. Some even can regrow a very rudimentary brain.

Now in an in-depth look at the genes of 10 comb jelly species, researchers report that these mysterious creatures evolved a unique nervous system in a completely different way than the rest of the animal kingdom.

In other words, the nervous system evolved more than once, a finding published Wednesday by the journal Nature that challenges long-standing theories about animal development.

"This paper proves, on a genomic basis, they're truly aliens," said University of Florida neurobiologist Leonid Moroz, whose team spent seven years unraveling the genetics behind comb jellies' neural programming.

But the findings aren't just about evolutionary history. Comb jellies build a nervous system essentially using their own biological language, Moroz explained. That points to new ways to investigate brain diseases such as Alzheimer's or Parkinson's - maybe even, one day, the ability to engineer new neurons, Moroz said.

They "open to us completely unexpected windows," he said.

Moroz is exploring some of those windows using a unique floating laboratory that allows sophisticated genomic sequencing at sea. In a test run off the coast of Florida this spring, The Associated Press documented how his team is studying which genes switch on and off as iridescent comb jellies regenerate from injury.

All animals evolved from a single ancestor. Scientists want to determine which branches broke off first, and how the earliest animals gradually changed to become more complex. The general theory: The oldest animals were the simplest, and once neural systems emerged, they evolved in a straightforward path from primitive nerve nets up to complex human brains.

Moroz's team offered a dramatically different explanation.

The researchers mapped the full genetic code of the Pacific sea gooseberry, the nickname for a comb jelly species known as Pleurobrachia bachei. They also decoded gene activity of nine additional species of ctenophores - the scientific name for comb jellies. (The "c" is silent.)

First, they found comb jellies represent the oldest branch of the animal family tree - not the simpler sea sponges traditionally thought to hold that spot, the team reported. That bolsters a similar finding published last December by competing scientists from the National Institutes of Health, which had been greeted with some skepticism.

And it's important in this context because sponges don't have neurons.

So what happened? Parallel evolution, Moroz proposed: While other branches of the animal family tree shared one path, the comb jellies essentially went down another street as they developed circuits of neurons, nerve cells that control such functions as motion and behavior. They simply don't have many of the genes that other animals use for neural development and function.

The results were "really weird," Moroz said. "Everybody from jellyfish to us have the same alphabet" when neurons communicate - but not the more ancient comb jellies.

For example, ctenophores don't use serotonin, dopamine and other common signaling chemicals, called neurotransmitters. Instead, they use methods unique to them.

"They're presenting data that's quite powerful," said biologist Antonis Rokas of Vanderbilt University, who wasn't part of the new work.

"It's almost like evolution has given us two different blueprints for building a structure that's very important," he added. "If your goal is to make a nervous system, it doesn't matter what the parts are in some ways. You could potentially mix and match. The more parts you have, the more solutions."

Read Full Story

People are Reading