Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
AOL Favorites

South Korea ferry was routinely overloaded

South Korean Ferry Routinely Overloaded, Korean Press Claims

INCHEON, South Korea (AP) - The doomed ferry Sewol exceeded its cargo limit on 246 trips - nearly every voyage it made in which it reported cargo - in the 13 months before it sank, according to documents that reveal the regulatory failures that allowed passengers by the hundreds to set off on an unsafe vessel. And it may have been more overloaded than ever on its final journey.

One private, industry-connected entity recorded the weights. Another set the weight limit. Neither appears to have had any idea what the other was doing. And they are but two parts of a maritime system that failed passengers April 16 when the ferry sank, leaving more than 300 people missing or dead.

The disaster has exposed enormous safety gaps in South Korea's monitoring of domestic passenger ships, which is in some ways less rigorous than its rules for ships that handle only cargo. Collectively, the country's regulators held more than enough information to conclude that the Sewol was routinely overloaded, but because they did not share that data and were not required to do so, it was practically useless.

The Korean Register of Shipping examined the Sewol early last year as it was being redesigned to handle more passengers. The register slashed the ship's cargo capacity by more than half, to 987 tons, and said the vessel needed to carry more than 2,000 tons of water to stay balanced.

But the register gave its report only to the ship owner, Chonghaejin Marine Co. Ltd. Neither the coast guard nor the Korean Shipping Association, which regulates and oversees departures and arrivals of domestic passenger ships, appear to have had any knowledge of the new limit before the disaster.

"That's a blind spot in the law," said Lee Kyu-Yeul, professor emeritus at Seoul National University's Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering.

Chonghaejin reported much greater cargo capacity to the shipping association: 3,963 tons, according to a coast guard official in Incheon who had access to the documentation but declined to release it.

Since the redesigned ferry began operating in March 2013, it made nearly 200 round trips - 394 individual voyages - from Incheon port near Seoul to the southern island of Jeju. On 246 of those voyages, the Sewol exceeded the 987-ton limit, according to documents from Incheon port.

The limit may have been exceeded even more frequently than that. In all but one of the other 148 trips, zero cargo was recorded. It is not mandatory for passenger ferries to report cargo to the port operator, which gathers the information to compile statistics and not for safety purposes.

More than 2,000 tons of cargo was reported on 136 of the Sewol's trips, and it topped 3,000 tons 12 times. But the records indicate it never carried as much as it did on its final disastrous voyage: Moon Ki-han, a vice president at Union Transport Co, the company that loaded the ship, has said it was carrying an estimated 3,608 tons of cargo.

The port operator has no record of the cargo from the Sewol's last voyage. Ferry operators submit that information only after trips are completed. In that respect, the rules for domestic passenger ships are looser than those for cargo-only vessels, which must report cargo before they depart.

Details from the port documents were first reported by the South Korean newspaper Kukmin Daily.

In paperwork filed before the Sewol's last voyage, Capt. Lee Joon-seok reported a much smaller final load than the one Moon described, according to a Coast Guard official who had access to the report but refused to provide a copy to the Associated Press. The paperwork said the Sewol was loaded with 150 cars and 657 tons of cargo.

That would fall within the 987-ton limit, but it's clearly inaccurate: The coast guard has found 180 cars in the water.

An official with the Korea Shipping Association's safety team said it is beyond the association's capacity to determine whether a ship is carrying too much cargo. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't allowed to discuss the Sewol case as it is being investigated.

"What we can do is to see the load line is not submerged," he said. The load line, a marking on the outside of a vessel, indicates whether a ship is overloaded, but it does not show whether it has the sort of balance between cargo and ballast that the register report said was necessary.

"The only person on any vessel who knows the exact cargo safety limit, excluding ballast water, fuel, passengers and others, is the first mate," the official said.

All 15 surviving crew members involved in the ferry's navigation have been arrested, accused of negligence and failing to protect passengers. Prosecutors also detained three employees of the ferry owner who handled cargo, and have raided the offices of the ship owner, the shipping association and the register. Heads of the shipping association and the register offered to resign in the wake of the disaster.

The cause of the sinking remains under investigation, but experts have said that if the ship were severely overloaded, even a small turn could cause it to lose its balance. Tracking data show the ship made a 45-degree turn around the time it began sinking; crew members have reportedly said that something went wrong with the steering as they attempted a much less severe turn.

Some experts say the Sewol never should have been cleared to operate after last year's redesign because the owner would not be able to make money under the register's new cargo limits.

The ferry operator "was trying to make a profit by overloading cargos," said Kim Gil-soo, a professor at Korea Maritime and Ocean University in Busan, "and public agencies that should have monitored did not monitor that."

According to South Korean law, the association may report violations to either the coast guard or the state-run port operator, but both entities said they were never told of excessive cargo on the Sewol. The shipping association has refused to say how often it has reported violations.

A coast guard official said the shipping association should have reported any excessive cargo to the operator of Incheon port, where the Sewol last departed. An official with the port operator says it is the coast guard that should have been alerted. The coast guard official spoke on condition of anonymity, saying he was not authorized to speak about matters under investigation; the port official refused to provide his name.

South Korea, unlike many other countries, relies on a private industry-affiliated body to determine whether a ship is safe to sail. The shipping association, whose members are shipping companies and ship operators, took on that responsibility in 1973, following a 1970 sinking in which about 320 people died.

Captains submit paperwork to the association indicating how much cargo is on board as well as crew and passengers.

The shipping association, which also oversees crew education, is partly government-funded, but its biggest business is selling insurance to its members.

Its website says about 75 percent of its 110 billion won ($107 million) budget for 2014 was allocated to its insurance department. The budget for the department dealing with domestic passenger ship safety was 7.4 billion won ($7.2 million). The association has 71 safety inspectors at 13 South Korean ports and its headquarters.

Many of the association's high-level officials come from the Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries, which some say makes it tough for the ministry to scrutinize the group. Ministry officials may be reluctant to question association officials who are former senior public servants, or even their former bosses.

The register, which made the cargo limit evaluation, also is a private entity.

In Europe, North America and Japan, regulation is generally done by public bodies such as the U.S. Coast Guard and the U.K.'s Maritime and Coastal Agency. In Japan, the government checks ships once a year, and conducts unannounced inspections of crew qualification and emergency training.

At the same time, it's common for governments to rely on ship captains to report their loads accurately. It would be virtually impossible to check every boat, experts say.

Since the Sewol disaster, the oceans ministry has been considering taking the job of overseeing passenger-ship safety away from the shipping association, ministry official Kwon Jun-young said. Kwon said they are discussing which agency or agencies should take up on the job.


Associated Press writers Jung-yoon Choi in Seoul, Sylvia Hui in London and Yuri Kageyama in Tokyo contributed to this report.

Join the discussion

1000|Characters 1000  Characters
justanindividual May 05 2014 at 4:30 AM

Incredibly sad for the hundreds of innocent, young, promising students who never had the chance to fulfill their potential. And grieving for their devastated parents whose loss is incalculable.

Clearly, inadequate government oversight and corporate greed caused this needless tragedy.

However, I admire the South Korean way of responding to this.

Instead of making excuses and blaming others, the captain and ferry crew seem ashamed and guilty, as they should. Even the innocent, honorable high school principal committed suicide because of his own perceived role in this disaster.

In America, guilty people hire an attorney and blame others.

The Korean government immediately seized all documents from the corporate owner to determine their negligence. A refreshing change from America, where we protect our greedy, negligent corporations that kill people.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
simons776 May 04 2014 at 11:28 PM

I guess when you say it had to carry 2000 tonns of water, I guess you mean the ballast tanks to keep it balanced? It will be nice if you explain it a bit better so that people can understand what you're talking about.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
1 reply
gordok simons776 May 05 2014 at 12:05 AM

If you read the report correctly, you would see that they did explain what the water was for.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
bobhhoy May 04 2014 at 11:28 PM

I wonder how many passenger ferrys in South Korea have been routinely overloaded with cargo in order to make a profit since the Sewol went down? When will the government of South Korea accept responsibility for their failure to regulate the industry? When will the owner of the Sewol take responsibility for putting profit before safety? When will the burden of this tragedy be spread beyond the captain and crew, who bear only part of the burden?

Flag Reply +2 rate up
1 reply
frank.foreman bobhhoy May 05 2014 at 12:18 AM

When the rest of the world leaders and their cheap governments (based upon not being killed for such actions by Joe Public etc) get a real life. Which will be never.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
eteeuwe May 04 2014 at 11:15 PM

The Korean Register( similar to the American Bureau of Shipping on U.S. Flagged ships) would have assigned a Loadline for the Sewol and issued a Stability Letter, which would have been posted in the Pilothouse of the ship, which is required on all vessels by the International Maritime Association(part of the U.N.). In the U.S., the Stability Letter is usually issued by the Coast Guard. The Stability Letter specifically states the tonnage allowed and conditions to be met to maintain both intact and damage Stability.

The 1st. Mate aboard a vessel is responsible for the correct calculation and placement of weight and ballast water brought aboard to maintain the Center of Buoyancy of the vessel in accordance with the Stability Letter and is required to sign off on same in the ships log.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
1 reply
frank.foreman eteeuwe May 05 2014 at 12:22 AM

If ships on the high seas are so well spoken for , in terms of regulations and such - how do you explain Maersk paying Somalian pirates millions of dollars to get their huge cargo ships back , when they were taken by force from them? Stolen , docked/ported - while they simply paid them millions to get it all over with. Something is wrong with that.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
2 replies
frank.foreman frank.foreman May 05 2014 at 12:23 AM

Would you like to see more regulations posted on the walls of these ships. It wouldn't matter if it was posted on foreheads - when corruption is rampant , crime is involved.

Flag +1 rate up
marcanagnos frank.foreman May 05 2014 at 12:44 AM

They figured it was better than risking the lives of their crew. Once it became a news report the govt came in and captured these criminals. Cost the govt way more than millions.


Flag 0 rate up
iluvfreespeech May 04 2014 at 10:59 PM

if they were overloaded on that many trips then who ever knew they were should be hung for allowing it to continue

Flag Reply +2 rate up
1 reply
Ghetto Cat iluvfreespeech May 04 2014 at 11:15 PM

In death there is no learning, just evil.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
BlahBlahBlah May 04 2014 at 10:59 PM

"The only person on any vessel who knows the exact cargo safety limit, excluding ballast water, fuel, passengers and others, is the first mate"

Well, this obviously needs to change.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
mnwishbone May 04 2014 at 10:58 PM

This what the GOP wants to do - make private industry responsible for policing themselves.... We see how that works in this disaster....

Flag Reply +4 rate up
1 reply
marcanagnos mnwishbone May 05 2014 at 12:39 AM

Always a liberal to make a stupid comment. No, liberals overload vehicles to make money, the Republicans know that it would result in loss of the vehicle.


Flag Reply +1 rate up
setec5354 May 04 2014 at 10:53 PM

The Korean government and the ship owner are about kick back, money and corruptions!! You can never in any lifetime pay for the death of those children and the sorrow cause to the parents!!!! They should be executed plus pay monetary damages.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
Maire! May 04 2014 at 10:42 PM

Another reason to be happy we live in America!

Flag Reply +2 rate up
Pllc15 May 04 2014 at 10:35 PM

For the high degree of progress S. Korea made since the Korean War, this tragedy has set them back as a thrid-world country.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
aol~~ 1209600


More From Our Partners