14
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
Video
Video
AOL Favorites
Favorites
Menu

In Ukraine's East, Mayor held hostage by insurgent



SLOVYANSK, Ukraine (AP) - When armed men seized the police station in this eastern Ukrainian city, mayor Nelya Shtepa declared she was on their side. She changed her story a few days later. Then she disappeared - the victim of an apparent abduction by the man who now lays claim to her job.

On Tuesday, she resurfaced, expressing support once again for the pro-Russia insurgents - but possibly no longer as mayor.

The mayoral mess, which pits the flamboyant leopard print-clad Shtepa against a mysterious rival who favors black baseball caps, reflects the anger, confusion and lawlessness that have gripped eastern Ukraine as armed groups opposed to the country's interim government seize police stations and government buildings.

In town after town in the beleaguered east, it's hard to tell who's in control - and the situation in Slovyansk is just one of the most dramatic examples. Since the unrest began, pro-Russia insurgents have adopted a strategy of electing so-called people's leaders: mayors and regional governors who claim to represent the people's will, despite their questionable background and skills for the job. One reportedly is under criminal investigation, another is an Internet blogger.

Caught in the middle of the turmoil are bewildered and anxious residents, for whom daily life proceeds blocks away from seized buildings surrounded by barricades and manned by masked gunmen.

"We're tired. We need only one thing: peace and quiet. It's not important who guarantees it, Moscow or Kiev," said cook Irina Grivets.

The man who now claims to be mayor says Shtepa was under the care of his comrades in the pro-Russia forces. But Vyacheslav Ponomarev is himself a dubious figure: No one seems to know his past and Ponomarev refuses to give any clarification.

Shtepa, famous for her platinum-blond hair, championed the insurgents' cause when they seized the police station on April 13 - saying she agreed with their demands of holding a referendum on the region's status.

"These are not some kind of out-of-towners from western Ukraine," Shtepa, dressed in a bright pink down jacket and high heels, told a crowd through a loudspeaker, as masked men in body armor cheered her on.

But as central authorities dispatched troops and military vehicles to retake the buildings and key infrastructure facilities in the east, Shtepa quickly changed course. She called the men insurgents and their presence an "occupation." She complained that they had seized and demolished her office and began referring to army troops dispatched by the Kiev government to fight the gunmen as "our, Ukrainian troops."

Shtepa explained her U-turn, saying that she had pretended to be on the gunmen's side in order to free dozens of hostages from the buildings that the insurgents stormed.

Speaking on a popular TV show last Wednesday, Shtepa complained of lootings by the insurgents and claimed that they were the Russian military: "Today, these already are Green Men," Shtepa said in a reference to military men aligned with Moscow. Little is known about the armed men other than their pro-Russia sentiments; it's not even clear whether they are Russian or Ukrainian or a mixture of both.

The following morning, she walked into city hall for a meeting with Ponomarev - and wasn't seen again for five days.

On Tuesday, the Russian news site LifeNews ran a video interview with her - in what the site said was her former office - praising the insurgents as men with "strong souls" and thanking Russian President Vladimir Putin for annexing Crimea. The report also showed what it said was a resignation letter that Shtepa willingly signed.

Unlike Shtepa, who was elected in 2010, Ponomarev's identity is a mystery to everyone.

By his own account, he served in the Soviet army and in special forces after the fall of the Soviet Union. Until recently, he was running a tailor's shop and now heads a company that produces soap. Asked about the specifics, or even his residence and citizenship, he typically answers: "I'm not going to tell you."

Tanned and rugged like a construction worker, Ponomarev sounds like a military man although his accent is difficult to pin down and it's not clear whether he has any ties to Slovyansk.

He is usually seen in an entourage of masked gunmen and two women, one of whom is a local lawmaker. The women seem to be clueless about Ponomarev's past, too.

Ponomarev brushes off questions about his legitimacy or even details of how he was elected. Residents seem to be unaware of exactly how the army veteran came to replace the middle-aged woman and are only praying the stand-off will end.

"Under Shtepa, things were quiet and the streets were clean," said teacher Andriy Khoronenko. "Now we've got barricades and drunken activists with automatic rifles and Russian flags. How am I supposed to feel about it?"

Join the discussion

1000|Char. 1000  Char.
Suzie & Dickie April 23 2014 at 8:21 AM

During WWII, the Germans on the Eastern Front were in full retreat from the Russians. The Russians stopped just before Warsaw and waited for the Germans to annihilate the Polish Resistance which was took quite a period of time. The Polish resistance had few weapons and made explosives and whatever they could find to protect themselves. They pleaded with the Russians, only miles away, for help but none came. Finally, the Polish resistance surrendered to the Germans and the Russians then started after the Germans again. So, Russia now owns Poland at the expense of thousands of Polish citizens lives. Poland suffered terribly during WWII as well as the Russian citizens of Stalingrad did from the Germans. But why from the Russians? The moral is: Putin, don't be another Stalin. I had some great hopes for your turning Russia into a democratic country. Unfortunately, here in the US, there are some leaders who are trying to get away from democracy.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
billisilly April 22 2014 at 2:36 PM

Why don't these activists just move back to Russia if they like Putin so much and let the Ukrainians live in peace. As for the EU and the US, have they forgotten how WW2 started with Hitler annexing territory to 'unite' the German people. If Putin is allowed to get away with this does anyone think that he wouldn't attempt to annex more territory to recreate the Sovirt Union!

Flag Reply +2 rate up
noadmail April 22 2014 at 2:33 PM

All this because somebody missed their shipment of Vodka

Flag Reply +1 rate up
etsinc1977 April 22 2014 at 2:47 PM

So the city of Slovyansk, Ukraine is now under the leadership of a guy named Vacheslav Ponomarev who has taken over the position of mayor. The funny thing is nobody knows who he is, where he came from and what his intentions are. Hey, that sounds familiar.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
1 reply
pepelaputr etsinc1977 April 22 2014 at 3:17 PM

He was tired of his garbage truck route anyway.
Un-paid "mayor" works for him.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
Lauderdale Sand April 22 2014 at 3:15 PM

Gotta love the conference table in the picture above - complete with lace tablecloth.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
kdarmon58 April 22 2014 at 3:14 PM

Let them fight it out. We should not be sending any money or anything else to the Ukraine. Russia will just get it anyway. Putin wants a civil war at his back door, I think not. We should have let Gen. Patten into Russia when he wanted to go.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
lewmanbubba April 22 2014 at 2:20 PM

they are all russian spec ops. call putty the LIARS that he is.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
pepelaputr April 22 2014 at 2:58 PM

Putin's extortion plot rolls on.
"His overall strategy (isn't) to absorb economically stressed Ukraine (let the West pump its money into those dire streets) but to appear that he might invade in order to earn grace when he didn't. The sin of annexing Crimea thus would be forgiven."
http://www.chron.com/opinion/outlook/article/Parker-Putin-continues-to-win-at-global-game-of-5415206.php

Putin needs Ukraine to pay their gas bill, and we will knee-jerk send boatloads of money to Kiev, which will then be used to pay their (Russian) debts.
He holds hostage Ukrainian military equipment that was captured in Crimea; they can have it back for "pennies on the dollar".

Putin doesn't need a costly civil war next door, someone might blow up those money-making pipelines strewn throughout the country.

This whole affair is purely economic in nature; Putin has Crimea and no long has to pay rent for berthing the Black Sea fleet there. Ukrainian "insurgents" are doing the heavy lifting of scaring the fool out of Kiev. If they're pawns, they may be liquidated when the time is right, or be left in place to eek out the last bit of cash possible.

Meanwhile, we'll display a whole bunch of weapons in eastern Europe that will allow Russia to assess our capabilities.

Even if he "backs down", it's win-win for Vladimir.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
jazzy61 April 22 2014 at 3:08 PM

Don't some anonymous organizations have any dones near by? = )

Flag Reply +1 rate up
jeanawest2007 April 22 2014 at 2:06 PM

Who's the neo-Nazi terrorist criminals now Putin?

Flag Reply +4 rate up
aol~~ 1209600

Voting...

More From Our Partners