Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
AOL Favorites

In Ukraine's East, Mayor held hostage by insurgent

SLOVYANSK, Ukraine (AP) - When armed men seized the police station in this eastern Ukrainian city, mayor Nelya Shtepa declared she was on their side. She changed her story a few days later. Then she disappeared - the victim of an apparent abduction by the man who now lays claim to her job.

On Tuesday, she resurfaced, expressing support once again for the pro-Russia insurgents - but possibly no longer as mayor.

The mayoral mess, which pits the flamboyant leopard print-clad Shtepa against a mysterious rival who favors black baseball caps, reflects the anger, confusion and lawlessness that have gripped eastern Ukraine as armed groups opposed to the country's interim government seize police stations and government buildings.

In town after town in the beleaguered east, it's hard to tell who's in control - and the situation in Slovyansk is just one of the most dramatic examples. Since the unrest began, pro-Russia insurgents have adopted a strategy of electing so-called people's leaders: mayors and regional governors who claim to represent the people's will, despite their questionable background and skills for the job. One reportedly is under criminal investigation, another is an Internet blogger.

Caught in the middle of the turmoil are bewildered and anxious residents, for whom daily life proceeds blocks away from seized buildings surrounded by barricades and manned by masked gunmen.

"We're tired. We need only one thing: peace and quiet. It's not important who guarantees it, Moscow or Kiev," said cook Irina Grivets.

The man who now claims to be mayor says Shtepa was under the care of his comrades in the pro-Russia forces. But Vyacheslav Ponomarev is himself a dubious figure: No one seems to know his past and Ponomarev refuses to give any clarification.

Shtepa, famous for her platinum-blond hair, championed the insurgents' cause when they seized the police station on April 13 - saying she agreed with their demands of holding a referendum on the region's status.

"These are not some kind of out-of-towners from western Ukraine," Shtepa, dressed in a bright pink down jacket and high heels, told a crowd through a loudspeaker, as masked men in body armor cheered her on.

But as central authorities dispatched troops and military vehicles to retake the buildings and key infrastructure facilities in the east, Shtepa quickly changed course. She called the men insurgents and their presence an "occupation." She complained that they had seized and demolished her office and began referring to army troops dispatched by the Kiev government to fight the gunmen as "our, Ukrainian troops."

Shtepa explained her U-turn, saying that she had pretended to be on the gunmen's side in order to free dozens of hostages from the buildings that the insurgents stormed.

Speaking on a popular TV show last Wednesday, Shtepa complained of lootings by the insurgents and claimed that they were the Russian military: "Today, these already are Green Men," Shtepa said in a reference to military men aligned with Moscow. Little is known about the armed men other than their pro-Russia sentiments; it's not even clear whether they are Russian or Ukrainian or a mixture of both.

The following morning, she walked into city hall for a meeting with Ponomarev - and wasn't seen again for five days.

On Tuesday, the Russian news site LifeNews ran a video interview with her - in what the site said was her former office - praising the insurgents as men with "strong souls" and thanking Russian President Vladimir Putin for annexing Crimea. The report also showed what it said was a resignation letter that Shtepa willingly signed.

Unlike Shtepa, who was elected in 2010, Ponomarev's identity is a mystery to everyone.

By his own account, he served in the Soviet army and in special forces after the fall of the Soviet Union. Until recently, he was running a tailor's shop and now heads a company that produces soap. Asked about the specifics, or even his residence and citizenship, he typically answers: "I'm not going to tell you."

Tanned and rugged like a construction worker, Ponomarev sounds like a military man although his accent is difficult to pin down and it's not clear whether he has any ties to Slovyansk.

He is usually seen in an entourage of masked gunmen and two women, one of whom is a local lawmaker. The women seem to be clueless about Ponomarev's past, too.

Ponomarev brushes off questions about his legitimacy or even details of how he was elected. Residents seem to be unaware of exactly how the army veteran came to replace the middle-aged woman and are only praying the stand-off will end.

"Under Shtepa, things were quiet and the streets were clean," said teacher Andriy Khoronenko. "Now we've got barricades and drunken activists with automatic rifles and Russian flags. How am I supposed to feel about it?"

Join the discussion

1000|Characters 1000  Characters
EzinWy April 22 2014 at 3:51 PM

Let me simplify it for everyone / Позвольте мне упрощение ИТ для каждого ...

Vacheslav Ponomarev ... mofia thug / Северной Кореей mofia.

Peace. / Мира.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
pepelaputr April 22 2014 at 2:58 PM

Putin's extortion plot rolls on.
"His overall strategy (isn't) to absorb economically stressed Ukraine (let the West pump its money into those dire streets) but to appear that he might invade in order to earn grace when he didn't. The sin of annexing Crimea thus would be forgiven."

Putin needs Ukraine to pay their gas bill, and we will knee-jerk send boatloads of money to Kiev, which will then be used to pay their (Russian) debts.
He holds hostage Ukrainian military equipment that was captured in Crimea; they can have it back for "pennies on the dollar".

Putin doesn't need a costly civil war next door, someone might blow up those money-making pipelines strewn throughout the country.

This whole affair is purely economic in nature; Putin has Crimea and no long has to pay rent for berthing the Black Sea fleet there. Ukrainian "insurgents" are doing the heavy lifting of scaring the fool out of Kiev. If they're pawns, they may be liquidated when the time is right, or be left in place to eek out the last bit of cash possible.

Meanwhile, we'll display a whole bunch of weapons in eastern Europe that will allow Russia to assess our capabilities.

Even if he "backs down", it's win-win for Vladimir.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
greenlite5099 April 22 2014 at 7:36 PM

the man with the gun is always in charge, of course..

Flag Reply +2 rate up
Suzie & Dickie April 23 2014 at 8:21 AM

During WWII, the Germans on the Eastern Front were in full retreat from the Russians. The Russians stopped just before Warsaw and waited for the Germans to annihilate the Polish Resistance which was took quite a period of time. The Polish resistance had few weapons and made explosives and whatever they could find to protect themselves. They pleaded with the Russians, only miles away, for help but none came. Finally, the Polish resistance surrendered to the Germans and the Russians then started after the Germans again. So, Russia now owns Poland at the expense of thousands of Polish citizens lives. Poland suffered terribly during WWII as well as the Russian citizens of Stalingrad did from the Germans. But why from the Russians? The moral is: Putin, don't be another Stalin. I had some great hopes for your turning Russia into a democratic country. Unfortunately, here in the US, there are some leaders who are trying to get away from democracy.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
dirtypoliticsp April 22 2014 at 6:07 PM

Wow, how bias is aol.....deleting my damn comments. They won't even give my comments a minute. Free country my A**

Flag Reply +2 rate up
2 replies
dirtypoliticsp dirtypoliticsp April 22 2014 at 6:09 PM

Oops my bad is this where all of you guys are going to start calling me a putin lover and send me to Russia....Lmaol!

Flag Reply 0 rate up
rgkarasiewicz dirtypoliticsp April 22 2014 at 6:52 PM

At least you're able to comment here (for the time being), and unlike the de-facto government controlled, suppressed and censored Huffington Post. It could happen overnight when AOL will follow the Huffington Post's lead.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
2 replies
Big D rgkarasiewicz April 23 2014 at 5:18 AM

yeah screw huffpost..erase my comments all the time..should sue them over my freedom of speech..yeah i think i'll call a lawyer today

Flag 0 rate up
rgkarasiewicz rgkarasiewicz April 23 2014 at 4:34 PM

I wouldn't waste my time commenting on that site.

Flag 0 rate up
jazzy61 April 22 2014 at 3:08 PM

Don't some anonymous organizations have any dones near by? = )

Flag Reply +1 rate up
Lauderdale Sand April 22 2014 at 7:18 PM

Well, Obama started it, called in Kerry to fix it, and sent Joe Biden to threaten. None of it worked, and with every move this administration became more irrelevant. Obama is diplomatically bankrupt.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
1 reply
rgkarasiewicz Lauderdale Sand April 22 2014 at 7:22 PM


Flag Reply +2 rate up
sande90028 April 22 2014 at 6:16 PM

Seems a lot like we do things here, put totaly incapable people in office. We do it in a democratic way but there are no qualifications for the office. How about a degree, or being able to pass something like the SAT

Flag Reply +2 rate up
1 reply
rgkarasiewicz sande90028 April 22 2014 at 6:48 PM

The only qualification for any political office here is that one has to be a stooge of the billionaires and the multi-national corporations.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
kdarmon58 April 22 2014 at 3:14 PM

Let them fight it out. We should not be sending any money or anything else to the Ukraine. Russia will just get it anyway. Putin wants a civil war at his back door, I think not. We should have let Gen. Patten into Russia when he wanted to go.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
Lauderdale Sand April 22 2014 at 3:15 PM

Gotta love the conference table in the picture above - complete with lace tablecloth.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
aol~~ 1209600



World Series

More From Our Partners