nb_cid nb_clickOther -tt-nb this.style.behavior='url(#default#homepage)';this.setHomePage('http://www.aol.com/?mtmhp=acmpolicybanner081514 network-banner-promo mtmhpBanner
14
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
Video
Video
AOL Favorites
Favorites
Menu

Pistorius breaks down on stand in murder trial



By GERALD IMRAY

Apr. 14, 2014 6:25 AM EDT

PRETORIA, South Africa (AP) - The chief prosecutor in the murder trial of Oscar Pistorius on Monday accused him of tailoring his version of how he killed his girlfriend to fit evidence at the scene, exhaustively listing alleged inconsistencies in the athlete's account of the fatal shooting of Reeva Steenkamp.

The court temporarily adjourned late in the morning after the double-amputee runner started to sob while testifying about the moments before he killed Steenkamp in his home in the early hours of Feb. 14, 2013. Chief prosecutor Gerrie Nel had asked him what exactly he shouted as he moved toward the bathroom where he shot Steenkamp, who was behind a closed door in the toilet cubicle.

Pistorius said he thought there was an intruder in the house. After a long pause after the question, he said he screamed, using an expletive, for the purported intruder to get out of his house. As he testified, Pistorius began to wail and Judge Thokozile Masipa called an adjournment. Just over an hour later and after court resumed, Pistorius again broke down when replying to a question on why he had opened fire, causing a second adjournment.

The prosecution has said Pistorius' account of a mistaken shooting is a lie. Nel opened the fourth day of cross-examination by alleging that Pistorius had "concocted" his account of the shooting.

"You're tailoring your version as you're sitting there," Nel said. Later, he accused Pistorius of being a stickler for detail on some matters, in contrast to his frequent statements on the witness stand that he could not remember aspects of his testimony.

Nel noted that Pistorius earlier said he warned Steenkamp to call police about an intruder in a whisper, contradicting later testimony that he spoke in a "low tone" and the prosecutor also said blood spatter evidence indicated that the athlete's statement about the location of a duvet in the bedroom was false.

Pistorius has said the duvet was on the bed, and that police photographs of the bed cover on the floor suggest that police moved it there after the shooting. Nel said a pattern of blood drops on the duvet and on the carpet nearby show that it was on the floor before police arrived, and that its location amounts to evidence that the couple had been having an argument.

The prosecutor also alleged that Steenkamp was in the process of getting dressed in the midst of the nighttime argument and wanted to leave Pistorius' house shortly before the shooting. A pair of jeans strewn on the bedroom floor showed Steenkamp was putting them on, Nel said, and contrasted with her character as a neat person who wouldn't leave clothes lying around.

Pistorius responded that Steenkamp was neat, but he said the jeans were inside out and therefore showed that Steenkamp had not been in the process of donning them.

Nel also questioned why the athlete didn't give fuller details of his account in his bail statement last February, days after he killed Steenkamp. Pistorius had said then that there was a noise from the bathroom that caused him to think that people had broken into his house, but didn't explain until later that it was the bathroom window sliding across and slamming against the frame.

The athlete said Monday that he was on medication and traumatized while in a jail cell at the time of his bail statement, which could account for any discrepancies with his later testimony.

Nel also said it was improbable that, in Pistorius' story, Steenkamp didn't ask him why he was getting out of bed in the middle of the night to retrieve fans from the edge of the balcony.

Pistorius Breaks Down Under Intense Questioning

Join the discussion

1000|Char. 1000  Char.
CalamityBabs April 14 2014 at 1:42 PM

This Pistorius is as guilty as OJ Simpson! Just put two bullets in the back of his head and put the bastard out of his misery.

Flag Reply +10 rate up
2 replies
dapperone CalamityBabs April 14 2014 at 2:18 PM

Must be great to havre all the answers. We don't need and judge and jury, we have you.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
Cheryl Cook CalamityBabs April 14 2014 at 2:49 PM

ABSOLUTELY!!! CASE CLOSED!!! Hopefully this judge will have a lot more common sense than the OJ jury and not be influenced by his "celebrity status."

Flag Reply 0 rate up
fredwhyzer April 14 2014 at 1:23 PM

Casey Anthony walked and look at the overwhelming evidence against her. The whole family was lying, but the jury said, "Not Guilty!" These days murder is a forgivable crime. He didn't mean to plug her full of holes. She just was on her way out for awhile. What a tragic story. I hate over indulged people who are above the law.

Flag Reply +3 rate up
1 reply
Carole fredwhyzer April 14 2014 at 1:40 PM

Casey Anthony "walked" because : the Medical examiner did a shoddy autopsy. She "walked" because everyone lied. She "walked" because Jeff Ashton, one of the prosecutors, behaved like a jerk. The burden of proof lies with the prosecution. However, I don't believe she killed that child. I believe the child drowned and her father convinced her to cover it up.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
drm5169 April 14 2014 at 1:17 PM

He better be glad he did not do that and be standing trail in Texas. He would get the death penalty there. Dennis

Flag Reply +4 rate up
2 replies
drm5169 drm5169 April 14 2014 at 1:20 PM

Oops, wrote too fast. Trial instead of trail hahahaha

Flag Reply 0 rate up
Carole drm5169 April 14 2014 at 1:30 PM

Everyone gets the death penalty in Teas.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
1 reply
Glorybee Carole April 14 2014 at 1:37 PM

If guilty you do the crime you get the time or NO time!

Flag 0 rate up
debeececere April 14 2014 at 1:12 PM

I think Pistorius could have a great career as a fiction writer if all else fails.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
pj792 April 14 2014 at 1:12 PM

If you have your girlfriend or boyfriend sleep over and you hear noise in the bathroom at night your not going to start shooting without making sure it's not them. Most likely you would just roll over and go back to sleep. His story is so far fetched it's pure lunacy.

Flag Reply +6 rate up
1 reply
Cheryl Cook pj792 April 14 2014 at 3:03 PM

Yea, and who locks the door to use the bathroom when you;re with a boyfriend. Probably don't even close the door so his story is total BULL_____!

Flag Reply 0 rate up
ultimatecage April 14 2014 at 10:13 AM

I cannot believe she did not voice her posision in the bathroom. Why would Steenkamp stay silent. She was probably screeming to him, informing him she was leaving and could not tolerate his insanity any longer. A man that crys and throws up when ask a question, is feeling extreme pressure from his guilt and lies. If he were inocent, the process would be simple and straight forward.
If you were to have an intruder, and you were so affraid, would you dial,911, gather your loved ones and remove yourself from the danger zone. I ,as a untrained person in a combative situation, sure wouldn't walk up to a door, that I thought the intruder was behind, in fear of being shot or confronted by the unknown. Also, does he wear the blade runners to bed? and isn't it a process fit and install? if he gets off, he and OJ, can start a club, Murder for Dummies

Flag Reply +6 rate up
2 replies
b19821 ultimatecage April 14 2014 at 10:32 AM

Did she not scream right after the first shot....and he said he could not hear her?? I think he heard her and fired again....................

Flag Reply +6 rate up
angelma48 ultimatecage April 14 2014 at 10:44 AM

He isn't going to be as lucky as OJ. If he was tried here maybe. But there I don't think so. This judge is disgusted with his antics to begin with. He is out of control, having temper tantrums in a different way. His rage caused him to kill a defenseless human being, he knew she was in the bathroom and he shot thru the door at her. Why didn't he check to see that she was safe before he shot that gun. He deserves to spend the rest of his life in jail. I don't think there is a jury there. I think the judge determines his guilt or innocence. If that's the case he's finished.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
judypiano April 14 2014 at 1:09 PM

He isn't guilty until the jury says so and the judge agrees.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
6 replies
rb April 14 2014 at 1:03 PM

Does anyone expect him not to LIE to save his ass? Does anyone who commits a crime just go to jail and admit their guilt? Once in a while, but rarely. Defense attorneys know their clients committed the crime and are real ass-holes for aiding the client to create a false set of events.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
1 reply
jack rb April 14 2014 at 1:09 PM

But, remember, that is what a defense Attorny's job is and it is why he was hired and what he gets paid for in the first place.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
2 replies
scollegeville3 jack April 14 2014 at 1:24 PM

YES AND THEY ARE STILL IN FACT ********

Flag 0 rate up
Carole jack April 14 2014 at 1:31 PM

I believe that everyone deserves a vigorous defense. I do not agree in defense or prosecutors suborning perjury.

Flag +1 rate up
Mom and Dad April 14 2014 at 12:59 PM

We'll have to wait to see if his tears get him off the hook.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
KIRK April 14 2014 at 12:58 PM

if the intruder is in the bathroom---why shoot through the door? my bathroom has only 1 door which makes it pretty easy to secure a position with my firearm and await the intruder if he chooses to exit and behave in an aggressive manor. if he escapes through a window,then he is not a threat to me.......unless he steal all the Charmin.

Flag Reply +6 rate up
aol~~ 1209600

Voting...

More From Our Partners