nb_cid nb_clickOther -tt-nb this.style.behavior='url(#default#homepage)';this.setHomePage('http://www.aol.com/?mtmhp=acmpolicybanner081514 network-banner-promo mtmhpBanner
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
AOL Favorites

Prosecutor: Pistorius is untruthful, an egotist



PRETORIA, South Africa (AP) -- Oscar Pistorius' credibility was consistently questioned at his murder trial Thursday as the chief prosecutor argued that the star athlete had a string of unlikely excuses why he wasn't to blame in the three gun charges he faces on top of murder for the shooting death of girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp.

Prosecutor Gerrie Nel, in cross-examining Pistorius for a second day, doubted the Olympian's honesty. It goes to the heart of the case.

Nel asserted that the double-amputee runner wouldn't "accept responsibility for anything" and reacted incredulously to Pistorius' explanation of why a gun he was handling went off under a table in a packed restaurant, for which he was charged with firing a gun in public without good reason.

Pistorius said a friend's pistol, a Glock, went off while he was holding it but insisted that he hadn't pulled the trigger. The incident happened just weeks before model Steenkamp was shot to death by Pistorius on Feb. 14, 2013. A police expert testified earlier at the trial that the Glock couldn't be fired without the trigger being pulled.

Nel said: "We have you in possession of the gun, a shot went off, but you didn't discharge the gun? ... I'm putting it to you, you fired that gun. There is no other way," Nel said. "You are lying."

"I respect Mr. Nel's comment," Pistorius replied, "but I didn't pull the trigger on that firearm."

Pistorius also said two witnesses, a former girlfriend and a friend, were both lying about an incident in 2012 when the runner is alleged to have fired his gun out the sunroof of a moving car. Pistorius said he wasn't guilty of yet another against him, illegal possession of ammunition for .38-caliber ammunition found in a safe in his home after he killed Steenkamp.

Pistorius said his father had put the bullets into the safe and that they belonged to the father. But Nel said Pistorius' father Henke had "refused" to make a statement to police on the ammunition being his.

"You just don't want to accept responsibility for anything," Nel said to Pistorius. Pistorius' answers to the accusations were short denials.

By attacking Pistorius' credibility on the other three charges, Nel was pushing the prosecution's argument that Pistorius, a multiple Paralympic champion, is also lying about killing his girlfriend by mistake in the pre-dawn hours of Valentine's Day last year.

Pistorius, 27, says Steenkamp's death was a terrible accident after he mistook her for an intruder and fired four times with his licensed 9 mm pistol through a toilet door and into a cubicle. Prosecutors say he intended to kill the 29-year-old after a loud argument heard by witnesses and charged him with premeditated murder - for which he faces 25 years to life in prison if convicted.

Pistorius insisted again Thursday that the shooting was an accident and he did not intentionally fire four shots.

"I didn't have time to think about if I wanted to or didn't want to," Pistorius said. It was his fourth day in the witness stand, the first two days having been spent being questioned by his own attorney, Barry Roux.

Nel also accused him of egotistical behavior in his relationship with Steenkamp, and described Pistorius' courtroom apology to his girlfriend's family on Monday as an insincere "spectacle" that ignored the feelings of her relatives. Steenkamp's mother, June, has attended court sessions this week.

"Your life is just about you," Nel said to Pistorius, claiming he wasn't "humble enough" to apologize in private to the family and away from the media glare of his murder trial, which is being broadcast live around the world.

"That's not true," Pistorius replied.

Pistorius said his lawyers had been in touch with representatives of Steenkamp's family, and that he had believed the family of his girlfriend was not ready to meet him.

"I completely understand where they're coming from," he said. "It's not that I haven't thought about them."

Nel asserted that Pistorius was sometimes mean to Steenkamp, pressing him about her objection to him playing a song by American rapper Kendrick Lamar on a car stereo. Pistorius referred to the song in a cellphone message to Steenkamp that acknowledged her objections and has been included as evidence in the trial.

The prosecutor asked if the name of the song was "Bitch, Don't Kill My Vibe," but Pistorius said he couldn't remember the specific song. Nel responded that Steenkamp would have been right to take offense, but "we can't ask her."

A phone message from Steenkamp to Pistorius that was shown in court includes the line: "You make me happy 90% of the time and I think we are amazing together but I am not some other bitch you may know trying to kill your vibe."

Two contrasting images of the double-amputee runner have emerged in court: the defense-led image of Pistorius as a contrite man who had been worried about crime and made a mistake on the night he killed Steenkamp, and the prosecution's depiction of him as an overbearing egotist who was obsessed with firearms and killed her intentionally.

On the relationship, Nel said he had checked all of Steenkamp's text messages on her phone and the phrase "I love you" appeared only twice in those missives. On both occasions, he said, they were written by Steenkamp to her mother.

"Never to you and you never to her," Nel said, addressing Pistorius.

"I never got the opportunity to tell Reeva that I loved her," Pistorius said in a soft voice. He did not look at Nel while replying to the prosecutor's questions, instead directing his gaze to Judge Thokozile Masipa on the dais.

Masipa will deliver a verdict because there is no jury system in South Africa.


Join the discussion

1000|Char. 1000  Char.
roundrec April 10 2014 at 1:22 PM

You left out ,paranoid , coward , gun nut crybaby. Suck it up ,BE A MAN for once.

Flag Reply +5 rate up
Audrey Denise April 10 2014 at 2:37 PM

Either way this is a very sad case.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
Kathryn April 10 2014 at 2:39 PM

only following this story casually but based on published pictures he's bawling like a baby (and by that I mean: hello get tissue?) or looking pissed off. not a really great actor.

Flag Reply +3 rate up
1 reply
deejunebug Kathryn April 10 2014 at 10:19 PM

I haven't watched the trial...are there actual tears rolling down his cheeks? OR...is he going through all the motions of "crying" only using his voice to convey his emotions. There is a big difference between real tears and crocodile tears...i.e. Casey Anthony used the latter to pretend she was remorseful.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
jeanne021556 April 10 2014 at 2:41 PM

The lawyer has Oscar figured out ! I hope the prosecution wins the case and puts Oscar in jail for many years.

Flag Reply +3 rate up
eiujb2 April 10 2014 at 2:42 PM

I agree with all the below. He was a manipulator from the get go. He knew what he was doing at the time of the incident. He is using his ' no legs ' condition to aide in his defense. And all that crying is a pure pity party he is trying to convey. I hope it doesn't fly.

Flag Reply +5 rate up
Anne April 10 2014 at 2:42 PM

Guilty, Guilty, Guilty. I'm sorry he's a double amputee. Taking the lives of others is still NOT OKAY.

Flag Reply +5 rate up
sylvabugg2 April 10 2014 at 2:46 PM

The man is a textbook sociopath. Look up what defines one, he fits every one to a "T".

Flag Reply +5 rate up
bbh907 April 10 2014 at 2:46 PM

Only 2 people know what actually happend that night and one of them is dead. I don't buy any of what Pistorius is saying.I just hope justice is served and Reeva's family gets some closure.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
franmal111 April 10 2014 at 2:52 PM

She had to scream and try to stop him. It is normal human reaction. If he didn't stop it means he went there to kill her.

Flag Reply +3 rate up
1 reply
debnaert franmal111 April 10 2014 at 3:14 PM

An expert testified about that.......... He fired 4 bullets off within a matter of 5 seconds.... and that meant that she was so wounded after the volley that she couldn't even have time to scream with her horrible wounds.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
3 replies
donmarste April 10 2014 at 2:53 PM

The question I have is...he knew he was in bed with Reeva. Did he bother to call for her or see where she was before he went over without the aid of his prosthetics to the bathroom door and start shooting? If he thought the "intruder" came in through the bathroom window why did he not establish the safety of his companion first?

Flag Reply +5 rate up
1 reply
Karen donmarste April 10 2014 at 3:57 PM

and people like this should be allowed to own guns? He is guilty, plain and simple.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
aol~~ 1209600


Back to School Deal


A new item every day in August
Back to School deal

More From Our Partners