nb_cid nb_clickOther -tt-nb this.style.behavior='url(#default#homepage)';this.setHomePage('http://www.aol.com/?mtmhp=acm50ieupgradebanner_112313 network-banner-empty upgradeBanner
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
AOL Favorites

US sending 2 warships to Japan to counter N. Korea

TOKYO (AP) - U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel delivered a two-pronged warning to Asia Pacific nations Sunday, announcing that the U.S. will send two additional ballistic missile destroyers to Japan to counter the North Korean threat, and saying China must better respect its neighbors.

In unusually forceful remarks about China, Hagel drew a direct line between Russia's takeover of Ukraine's Crimea region and the ongoing territorial disputes between China, Japan and others over remote islands in the East China Sea.

"I think we're seeing some clear evidence of a lack of respect and intimidation and coercion in Europe today with what the Russians have done with Ukraine," Hagel told reporters after a meeting with Japanese Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera. "We must be very careful and we must be very clear, all nations of the world, that in the 21st century this will not stand, you cannot go around the world and redefine boundaries and violate territorial integrity and sovereignty of nations by force, coercion and intimidation whether it's in small islands in the Pacific or large nations in Europe."

Hagel, who will travel to China later this week, called the Asian nation a "great power," and added, "with this power comes new and wider responsibilities as to how you use that power, how you employ that military power."

He said he will talk to the Chinese about having respect for their neighbors, and said, "coercion, intimidation is a very deadly thing that leads only to conflict. All nations, all people deserve respect no matter how large or how small."

Still, he said he looks forward to having an honest, straightforward dialogue with the Chinese to talk about ways the two nations and their militaries can work better together.

The announcement of the deployments of additional destroyers to Japan came as tensions with North Korea spiked again, with Pyongyang continuing to threaten additional missile and nuclear tests.

In recent weeks the North has conducted a series of rocket and ballistic missile launches that are considered acts of protest against annual ongoing springtime military exercises by Seoul and Washington. North Korea says the exercises are rehearsals for invasion.

North and South Korea also fired hundreds of artillery shells into each other's waters in late March in the most recent flare-up.

Standing alongside Onodera at the defense ministry, Hagel said they discussed the threat posed by Pyongyang. He said the two ships are in response to North Korea's "pattern of provocative and destabilizing actions" that violate U.N. resolutions and also will provide more protection to the U.S. from those threats.

On Friday, North Korea accused the U.S. of being "hell-bent on regime change" and warned that any maneuvers with that intention will be viewed as a "red line" that will result in countermeasures. Pyongyang's deputy U.N. ambassador, Ri Tong Il, also said his government "made it very clear we will carry out a new form of nuclear test" but refused to provide details.

The two additional ships would bring the total to seven U.S. ballistic missile defense warships in Japan, and it continues U.S. efforts to increase its focus on the Asia Pacific.

The ships serve as both defensive and offensive weapons. They carry sophisticated systems that can track missile launches, and their SM-3 missiles can zero in on and take out short- to medium-range missiles that might be fired at U.S. or allied nations. They can also carry Tomahawk cruise missiles, which can be launched from sea and hit high-value targets or enemy weapons systems from afar, without risking pilots or aircraft.

Hagel is on a 10-day trip across the Asia Pacific, and just spent three days in Hawaii meeting with Southeast Asian defense ministers, talking about efforts to improve defense and humanitarian assistance cooperation. Japan is his second stop, where he said he wants to assure Japanese leaders that the U.S. is strongly committed to protecting their country's security.

Japan and China have been engaged in a long, bitter dispute over remote islands in the East China Sea. The U.S. has said it takes no side on the question of the disputed islands' sovereignty, but it recognizes Japan's administration of them and has responsibilities to protect Japanese territory under a mutual defense treaty.

Onodera said he and Hagel talked about the islands, known as Senkaku by Japan and Diayou by China, and the concerns about any changes to the status quo there.

Hagel said the U.S. wants the countries in the region to resolve the disputes peacefully. But he added that the United States would honor its treaty commitments.

The ships are just the latest move in America's effort to beef up Japan's defenses. Last October, the U.S. and Japan agreed to broad plans to expand their defense alliance, including the decision to position a second early warning radar there by the end of this year. There is one in northern Japan and the second one would be designed to provide better missile defense coverage in the event of a North Korean attack.

The U.S. will begin sending long-range Global Hawk surveillance drones to Japan this month for rotational deployments. They are intended to help step up surveillance around the Senkaku islands.

Join the discussion

1000|Characters 1000  Characters
IRVING April 06 2014 at 10:59 AM

The Japanese have never respected the Chinese or the Koreans, north and south. The Chinese and Koreans also know that Japan is no country to mess with. They understand the absurd Asian face saving credo and know just how far to prod. The two warships that we are sending should be just enough for someone to back down if it came to that. Some one in our government is finally thinking.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
2 replies
pennyuniv IRVING April 06 2014 at 11:07 AM

Do you think they really care what Obama thinks. He hasn't done anything yet. All talk and no do.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
1 reply
geocur3971 pennyuniv April 06 2014 at 11:25 AM

How about creating 195,000 jobs this month, for 'something'? Or paying down the national debt at a faster rate than has happened in the past 10 years?

It is, indeed, odd that people such as you can be strongly negatively critical -- or try to be; most off your efforts are, to put it kindly, a bit clumsy --in the very face of statistics that put your criticisms immediately in strong doubt.

Perhaps not so odd, as outright RACIST.

Flag 0 rate up
debnaert IRVING April 06 2014 at 11:18 AM

CHINESE HATE THE JAPS..... read your history about the Japs and what they did to the Chinese.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
nebham96 April 06 2014 at 1:26 PM

Was it not just a month ago they were talking about shrinking our military to pre wwII size.
With the things going on in Russia,Syria,N, Korea,Iran,China,Afganistan,Iran and all over maybe we could. But wwIII is in a very likely process of happening,hope not.
If we didn't try to police the world at OUR expense which keeps putting us deeper and deeper in dept, while China,Russia Europe sit back and say spend baby spend. Who is going to help us when we become weak,Ha nada. I do agree we have to stay strong and help the world to bring peace but we can not do it alone. Countries do not mess with you when you are strong, financialy
and militarily.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
1 reply
soundandscreen nebham96 April 06 2014 at 2:24 PM

Point(s) taken.......

Flag Reply 0 rate up
carnut122 April 06 2014 at 10:17 AM

"....you cannot go around the world and redefine boundaries and violate territorial integrity and sovereignty of nations by force, coercion and intimidation whether it's in small islands in the Pacific or large nations in Europe." Good thing the US would never do that (sarcasm).

Flag Reply +1 rate up
1 reply
Joe Baricev carnut122 April 06 2014 at 10:39 AM

You are right..US invaded and took Texas from Mexico and the rest of the country from the Native Indians!
That is now called "Naked Aggression" we called it "Manefest Destiny"!

Flag Reply +1 rate up
bjredmond64 April 06 2014 at 10:10 AM

wars and rumors of war......

Flag Reply +4 rate up
frozenbull April 06 2014 at 1:57 PM

We give way too much attention to this little piss ant in North Korea. If need be ,we can squash him like a bug in the time it takes to brew a cup of coffee.

Flag Reply +3 rate up
1 reply
mikoncons frozenbull April 06 2014 at 2:07 PM

Actually, it is a politically driven move for the purpose of making Obama appear as a fearless leader. Obama has never made a timely dicision in his political career and can't seem to separate and balance the related issues in order to make a dicision.
In other words, Obama is and always has been incompetent.

Flag Reply +3 rate up
1 reply
ferrariqx mikoncons April 06 2014 at 2:36 PM

Incompetent? Interesting. Unlike you, I'll bet he can spell "decision" correctly.

Flag 0 rate up
wlewan60 April 06 2014 at 2:05 PM

It's hard to believe the idoit posts I read here from the uninformed individuals who think they represent the GOP ideals.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
1 reply
Meh... wlewan60 April 06 2014 at 2:18 PM

the truth you speak....

Flag Reply +2 rate up
eddie April 06 2014 at 2:08 PM

With all the U S involvement in the Ukraine and the asia pacific this has the potential to start world war 3 easily.God help us all

Flag Reply +2 rate up
eddie April 06 2014 at 2:15 PM

The reason USA will always be involved is because Puerto Rico and Guam were ceded to the United States as indemnity, and the Philippines were surrendered to the United States for a payment of $20 million after the Spanish American War. The United States emerged from the war with new international power. In both Latin America and East Asia it had established an imperial foothold. The war tied the United States more closely to the course of events in those areas

Flag Reply +3 rate up
Garland April 06 2014 at 9:46 AM

treaties are broken all the time and will be again. every country has broken treaties. The u.s first obligation is to the citizens of the u.s. period. who are the people that put us in this situation, by making treaties in the first place. nukes are a thing of the past. that is why we dont care if they have them or not.. it is smoke and mirriors to keep the u.s. citizens in line. probably another way of takiing more of our liberties. a war in any other country is better than a war in the u.s.. countries have no sovereignty anymore with global economy. If we do have another war we need to get it right this time. get rid of governments that surpress their people and put the forgein aid in their pockets.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
lalalexm1 April 06 2014 at 3:20 PM

Here we go.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
aol~~ 1209600


More From Our Partners