nb_cid nb_clickOther -tt-nb this.style.behavior='url(#default#homepage)';this.setHomePage('http://www.aol.com/?mtmhp=acm50ieupgradebanner_112313 network-banner-empty upgradeBanner
14
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
Video
Video
AOL Favorites
Favorites
Menu

25 years later, Exxon Valdez spill effects linger

Lingering Impact of Exxon Valdez Oil Spill


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) -- Before the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010 in the Gulf of Mexico, there was the Exxon Valdez disaster in Alaska, at the time the nation's largest oil spill.

The 987-foot tanker, carrying 53 million gallons of crude, struck Bligh Reef at 12:04 a.m. on March 24, 1989. Within hours, it unleashed an estimated 10.8 million gallons of thick, toxic crude oil into the water. Storms and currents then smeared it over 1,300 miles of shoreline.

For a generation of people around the world, the spill was seared into their memories by images of fouled coastline in Prince William Sound, of sea otters, herring and birds soaked in oil, of workers painstakingly washing crude off the rugged beaches.

Twenty five years later, most of the species have recovered, said Robert Spies, a chief science adviser to governments on the oil spill restoration program from 1989 to 2002. But some wildlife, as well as the people who live in the region, are still struggling.

Here's a look at what's changed since the spill:

-FISHERMAN

Bernie Culbertson was preparing to fish cod when the Exxon Valdez ran aground. With oil in the water, fishing came to a standstill and life for he and other fishermen drastically changed.

"The bottom fell out of the price of fish," he said. Pink salmon that sold for 80 cents per pound fell to 8 cents per pound. Consumers turned to farm fish or tuna out of fear of tainted salmon. His boat caught 2.5 million pound of pinks one season and lost money.

Culbertson turned to other fisheries, traveling as far as California. Fishing 12 months a year, his marriage failed. Friends couldn't repay loans and lost boats or homes. Exxon compensation checks, minus what fishermen earned on spill work, arrived too late for many.

The fisheries today are not the same. "The shrimp are slowly, slowly coming back. The crab aren't back. The herring aren't back. The salmon are back in abundance," he said.

-INDUSTRY

At the time of the spill, complacency among government officials and the oil industry had set in after a dozen years of safe shipments, said Mark Swanson, director of the Prince William Sound Regional Citizens Advisory Council and a former Coast Guard officer.

When the tanker ran aground, for instance, spill response equipment was buried under snow. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. in 1989 had 13 oil skimmers, five miles of boom and storage capacity for 220,000 gallons of spilled oil.

Now, Alyeska has 108 skimmers, 49 miles of boom and on-water storage capacity of almost 38 million gallons. North Slope oil must be transported in double-hull tankers, which must be escorted by two tugs. Radar monitors the vessel's position as well as that of icebergs.

The company conducts two major spill drills are conducted each year. And nearly 400 local fishing boat owners are trained to deploy and maintain boom

-PACIFIC HERRING

After the spill, the population of herring crashed. It is now listed as "not recovering." The silvery fish is a key species because it is eaten by salmon, seabirds and marine mammals from otters to whales. Four years after the spill, the estimated herring population based on modeling shrunk from 120 metric tons to less than 30 metric tons.

How that happened remains a question, said Scott Pegau, research program manager for the Oil Spill Recovery Institute in Cordova, Alaska.

Here's what's known: Adult herring feed on zooplankton, which crashed for three years after the spill. With less to eat, herring may have been more susceptible to disease normally fended off within a herring population.

Herring populations can stabilize at a low or high number, but something has prevented a rebound. Oil likely is no longer a factor, Pegau said.

-SEA OTTERS

Responders estimated that as many as 3,000 sea otters died the first year. Hundreds more died in the years after of exposure to oil that persisted in sediment, where otters dig for clams.

Three factors could have had an impact on the otters' ability to survive. Oiled fur loses insulating value. Otters ingest oil as they groom, and researchers years after the spill found blood chemistry evidence consistent with liver damage. Grooming takes time away from feeding.

"One of the lessons we can take from this is that the chronic effects of oil in the environment can persist for decades," said Brenda Ballachey, who moved to Alaska a few months after the spill and spent the next summer dissecting sea otter carcasses collected from beaches and frozen.

The U.S. Geological Survey research biologist is the lead author of a federal study released last month that concludes that sea otters have finally returned to pre-spill numbers.

-PIGEON GUILLEMOTS

The pigeon guillemot (GEEL'-ah-mot), which looks like a black pigeon with web feet, is one species that has not recovered. Numbers were declining before the spill. An estimated 2,000 to 6,000 guillemots, or 10 to 15 percent of the population in spill areas, died from acute oiling.

Researchers suspect river otters, mink and other predators targeted guillemot eggs as an alternative to foraging on oiled beaches.

Like sea otters and another bird that took years to recover, harlequin ducks, pigeon guillemot's forage for invertebrates in sediment and likely were affected by lingering oil, said David Irons, a seabirds expert with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

The decline of its other prey, juvenile herring, didn't help. Numbers continue to decline in both oiled and non-oiled areas. Irons has proposed reducing mink numbers on the heavily oiled Naked Islands, once prime habitat for guillemots, to restore their numbers.

Join the discussion

1000|Char. 1000  Char.
HHESherfey1 March 24 2014 at 5:51 PM

I was so pissed when the Valdez ran aground, I quit buying Exxon gas, since that time I have HAD to buy it, but you can count on 1 hand the number of times I have,,,and it is less than 5. Same with BP. If enough people hit 'em in the pocketbook they might start paying attention.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
wschim March 20 2014 at 10:02 AM

It took 20 years for Exxon to pay the people directly affected by the spill. What was a judgment of 5 billion was knocked down to 383 million that's less then the interest on 5 billion for 20yrs. Shame on them.

Flag Reply +7 rate up
SweetfeetBaby March 20 2014 at 3:20 PM

"life for he and other fishermen drastically changed."
Apparently not one of AOL's team of article authors, nor it's Editors (if they actually have any) know that proper english is "him and other fishermen."
Honestly, who says "life for he?"
These are NOT journalists folks, and they know even less about how to keep their efforts honest and objective.
Back to school kiddies!

Flag Reply +3 rate up
lawrenceofparker March 20 2014 at 1:28 PM

Accidents and bad things happen in every industry, but it is not because that is what they desire to have happen. The cause is most frequently people or design flaw related. The Exxon Valdez incident was caused by human error. As a result, all tankers built since then are built with a double hull (two layers of steel); i.e., the industry and regulators learned from the incident. I doubt if Exxon wanted the Valdez spill to happen any more than NASA wanted to have a space ship blow up and kill their whole crew.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
1 reply
SweetfeetBaby lawrenceofparker March 20 2014 at 3:25 PM

Oh quit talking sense lawrence. They are much happier groaning & moaning, and DON'T want to hear it.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
calvin March 20 2014 at 12:58 PM

All of this because of a drunken tanker captain who was passed out in his cabin.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
nevadan99 March 20 2014 at 10:13 AM

You people who think you are boycotting Exxon and BP are living in a make believe world. These companies trade among themselves and sell to other non brands.

Flag Reply +5 rate up
stengernc March 20 2014 at 8:30 AM

We still have to fight the greed of wall street. The fracking of oil/gas wells is an example. Instead of relegating oil to be used for just airplanes, ships and critical needs we still use it for cars, heating homes, etc. when all that can be replaced with more sustainable technologies. The greed of wall street is our biggest enemy and continues to weaken this country.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
2 replies
James M. Adams stengernc March 20 2014 at 8:41 AM

So if you were king, only airplanes, ships, and "critical needs" would be using petrol? And you have the unmitigated gall to pronounce Wall Street "greedy"?

I would love to be Director of the Department of Critical Needs. I would buddy up with the Director of Propaganda.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
fay38 stengernc March 20 2014 at 8:47 AM

You do not know what you're talking about and far too ready to play the blame game.

What do you personally know about the oil business? About Wall Street investing? About anything?

Our biggest enemy is Obama and his socialist pals.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
1 reply
vandybars fay38 March 20 2014 at 8:53 AM

Like all Democrats, steng takes his marching orders from his/her handler. Or they are experts without a cause.

Flag 0 rate up
tylyn1210 March 20 2014 at 10:14 AM

UGH !!!

Flag Reply +2 rate up
alspoolhall March 20 2014 at 4:41 PM

Prince William Sound (Alaska) is still feeling the awful effects of the Exxon Valdez oil spill (1989) in more ways than one. Exxon fought in the courts not to have to pay all the monies due and rec'd huge reductions in those dollar amounts while making zillions of dollars all these years. And when the Deep Horizon spill happened in 2010 in The Gulf of Mexico, had we learned anything from that incident? No, of course not. That is who we are. We let these creeps off the hook every stinkin' time whether it be big oil, Wall Street or politicians. Exxon and BP both should have received a comeuppance for their actions . . . trying to save a few thousand dollars in each case . . . thereby causing huge castrophes to our planet while people and animals lost their lives. Evil prevails when good men do nothing as the saying goes.

Flag Reply +3 rate up
2 replies
marykinia alspoolhall March 20 2014 at 5:11 PM

Congressprostitutes have a price and Exxon paid it.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
Shirley alspoolhall March 20 2014 at 6:07 PM

I agree with you except that it wasn't "we" who let them get away with it; it was more like the corrupt judicial system..

Flag Reply +1 rate up
rrgmb March 20 2014 at 11:28 AM

I have never heard any comments about the agreements by industry and Goverments to react to splills such as happened. A week before the spill it was agreed and signed off that this was a perfect condition too burn the ship. The sea condition was perfect, Booms were aviable, Helicopters with igniters were in in position. All they had to do was to take off the log books and fire the wreck. Air poution would have massive but the mess would have been gone in a matter of weeks (? ) not 25 years plus,

Flag Reply +3 rate up
aol~~ 1209600

Voting...

More From Our Partners