nb_cid nb_clickOther -tt-nb this.style.behavior='url(#default#homepage)';this.setHomePage('http://www.aol.com/?mtmhp=acm50ieupgradebanner_112313 network-banner-empty upgradeBanner
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
AOL Favorites

Ukraine making plans to pull troops from Crimea

KIEV, Ukraine (AP) -- Ukraine's government said Wednesday it has begun drawing up plans to pull its troops from Crimea, where Russia is steadily taking formal control as its armed forces seize military installations across the disputed peninsula.

In a warning to Moscow, U.S. Vice President Joe Biden declared the United States will respond to any aggression against its NATO allies, which include neighbors to Russia.

Standing side by side with a pair of Baltic leaders in Vilnius, Lithuania, Biden said the U.S. was "absolutely committed" to defending its allies, adding that President Barack Obama plans to seek concrete commitments from NATO members to ensure the alliance can safeguard its collective security.

"Russia cannot escape the fact that the world is changing and rejecting outright their behavior," Biden said, after meeting in Vilnius with Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite and Latvian President Andris Berzins.

Ukraine's military, which is heavily outnumbered in Crimea, has come under increased pressure since the region was nominally incorporated into Russia on Tuesday. National Security and Defense Council secretary Andriy Parubiy said Ukraine will seek U.N. support to turn Crimea into a demilitarized zone as it seeks to relocate armed forces to the mainland.

Earlier Wednesday, masked Russian-speaking troops seized control over Ukraine's naval headquarters in the city of Sevastopol. A Ukrainian navy commander was also detained during that operation.

The several hundred militiamen who captured the base in Sevastopol met no resistance. Sevastopol is also the home port of Russia's Black Sea Fleet, and tens of thousands of Russian-led troops are now patrolling Crimea.

It came a day after a confrontation between Ukrainian soldiers and pro-Russian militia left two dead.

The Russian-speaking troops, who arrived on the base after the storming, wore helmets, flak jackets and uniforms with no identifying insignia. By afternoon, they were in full control of the naval headquarters, a set of three-story boxy white concrete buildings with blue trim. It was not immediately clear how many, if any, Ukrainian servicemen remained on the base.

Ukraine's Defense Ministry said no one was injured in the raid, which it said was led by pro-Russian militiamen and Cossacks.

The ministry said in its statement that Rear Adm. Sergei Haiduk was detained by unknown people after the storming of the fleet headquarters. The Russian state ITAR-Tass news agency reported that he was being questioned by Crimean prosecutors.

Ukraine's defense minister and deputy prime minister had planned to travel to Crimea on Wednesday in what they said was a bid to avert an escalation in hostilities.

The prime minister in Crimea warned after the announcement of their departure that they would be turned back, however.

"They are not welcome in Crimea," Sergei Aksyonov was quoted as saying by the Interfax news agency. "They will not be allowed to enter Crimea. They will be sent back."

Interfax later cited Welfare Minister Lyudmila Denisova as saying the officials had been denied entry to Crimea. She said an emergency session of the National Security and Defense Council will held in response.

At the Ukrainian navy headquarters, an Associated Press photographer said the militiamen took down the gate and made their way onto the base. They then raised the Russian flag on the square by the headquarters.

The unarmed militiamen waited for an hour on the square and, following the arrival of the commander of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, they took over the building.

The AP photographer was able to enter the headquarters and saw the militia roaming around while the Ukrainian servicemen were packing up and leaving.

On Tuesday, President Vladimir Putin signed a treaty to incorporate Crimea into Russia following a referendum Sunday in which residents of the region overwhelmingly backed the move.

Jubilant crowds in Moscow and other cities across Russia hailed the annexation, while Ukraine's new government called Putin a threat to the "civilized world and international security," and the U.S. and the European Union threatened tougher sanctions against Moscow. On Monday, Washington and Brussels targeted Russian and Crimean officials with visa bans and asset freezes.

Russian news agencies on Wednesday cited Constitutional Court chairman Valery Zorkin as saying the treaty signed by Putin has been ruled valid, thus formally clearing another hurdle for Moscow to annex Crimea. The treaty now only requires ratification by the Russian parliament.

A Ukrainian serviceman and a member of a militia were killed by gunfire in the incident in Crimea on Tuesday.

It is unclear whether the militiaman was a Ukrainian citizen. Although Moscow has insistently denied it has not deployed its own troops in Crimea, people in the peninsula have reported seeing a large number of military vehicles with Russian plates.

Thousands of troops under apparent Russian command took over Crimea two weeks before Sunday's hastily called referendum, seizing Ukrainian military bases, blockading others and pressuring Ukrainian soldiers to surrender their arms and leave.

Putin insisted Russia's military presence in Crimea was limited to those stationed under the terms of a treaty with Ukraine that allows Russia to have up to 25,000 troops at its Black Sea fleet base. Ukraine claims that Russia deployed further forces, however, and expressly went against its request for troops to remain confined within their barracks.

Join the discussion

1000|Characters 1000  Characters
Harley March 19 2014 at 3:39 PM

tortugatommie couldn't have said it better. Amen brother.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
1 reply
meatra Harley March 19 2014 at 4:04 PM

Harley you hat explains it all.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
wllthompson8 March 19 2014 at 4:20 PM

so what has changed in the last 4,000 years ?

Flag Reply +4 rate up
2 replies
Ed wllthompson8 March 19 2014 at 4:40 PM

The kinds of weapons we use to kill each other.

Flag Reply +3 rate up
Ken wllthompson8 March 19 2014 at 5:14 PM

This sentence by willthompson is probably the best thought out comment anyone has made in the comments section. We just drag on from war to war, it keeps us broke, and we keep doing it - that is so silly

Flag Reply 0 rate up
cae303 March 19 2014 at 4:25 PM

For years Russia and China have been adversaries regarding the Ukrane, Lybya, Syria, Egypt, Iran, Israel, Poland, Georgia and others. Their aggressive military and harmful economical policies will
escalate unless we take more serious action. This is Not the time for Michelle Obama to visit China!
What is going on...is this insanity?

Flag Reply +3 rate up
htfcd March 19 2014 at 4:25 PM

Throughout history, many nations tried to invade Russia.
Russians know well that they got only 1 friend - their army/fleet.
Some like Putin, some don't... but he defends Russian national interests.
It's not just about Russia... it's about Russia, China, India, Iran and Muslim countries.
As long as they are around, US and Western Europe can't have global domination.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
1 reply
Ed htfcd March 19 2014 at 4:40 PM

Sadly, the next global superpower will be China.

Flag Reply +3 rate up
1 reply
Mitch Ed March 19 2014 at 5:01 PM

Why is that sad? They were for 3000 years. Only the last 400 have they not been.

Flag 0 rate up
Jacquie March 19 2014 at 5:02 PM

V.P. Joe Biden declared that the U.S. is "absolutely committed to defending it's NATO Allies"........Has anyone told him that obama abandon the Missile Defence Shield in Europe in 2009?.....Maybe he should ask Poland or The Czech Republic.........

Flag Reply +8 rate up
jeffreysneller March 19 2014 at 3:12 PM

Notice how this A.P. story parrots the party line calling the Russian forces "Militiamen."

Flag Reply +4 rate up
1 reply
Welcome Justin jeffreysneller March 19 2014 at 3:32 PM

No, it refers to the local militia as the Russian backed militiamen. At least it is finally willing to admit that the soldiers their are not actually Russian soldiers, which is something most media outlets refuse to acknowledge. Try reading info from foreign news agencies such as BBC or Reuters if you actually want accurate information.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
chasmwuk March 19 2014 at 4:29 PM

It's funny that the same American and western leaders who say Crimea had no right to secede from Ukraine were the first ones to cheer when the USSR and Yugoslavia imploded. For that matter, we Texans seceded from Mexico in 1836 and a decade later decided to let ourselves be annexed by the U.S. Had there been a UN and NATO in 1846, they would have condemned the U.S.

Flag Reply +6 rate up
2 replies
Ed chasmwuk March 19 2014 at 4:38 PM

The key phrase in your well stated comment is "ten years." Rushing in and forcing a secession vote under the eyes of heavily armed troops is not quite the same.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
1 reply
mrland Ed March 19 2014 at 4:48 PM

What I recall through the history books is that a few people wanted to secede from Mexico after Mexico said they could no longer have slaves. Some of those same people called in US troops for assistance (San Antonio). If anything, the US set a recent historical precedent.

Flag +1 rate up
jdcoderus chasmwuk March 19 2014 at 9:39 PM

This is the "foreign policy" of our State Department: divide and conquer :) As far as " voluntary" statehood of some states - Alaska ( $17 mil to Russia to wage war against Japan - lost), Louisiana ( $15 million from Napoleon to go to war against Russia in 1812 - lost), Hawaii - annexed because local Dole farms were worried that new constitution will dissalow buying more property, and let local Hawaiians to vote - which was anathema at that time, Queen deposed, placed under house arrest, and,with marines help, added as a 50th state..no referendums in Alaska, Louisiana or Hawaii. Philippines - bought from Spain for $5 million after Adm. Dewey defeated Spanish Armada. Virgin Islands - split between GB and US - 2 islands each. Samoa was halved into American Samoa and Samoa. None of the people in territories were asked what they think or what they want/don't want. Funny, for sure ..

Flag Reply +1 rate up
1 reply
nanksy jdcoderus March 20 2014 at 7:48 AM

Both you and mrland had better reread your history. That is not the way I read it. Russia sold Alaska because they needed money They had taken it from the natives without asking , by the way.. We had no part in their war in Japan. Louisiana was sold by the French because they were fighting most of Europe and Russia. Jefferson considered it a good way to get Europe out of North America. Hawaii did not become a state until more than fifty years after the Queen was disposed and then they voted to become a state. The Phillipines became a protecterate when the Japanese lost it in 1945 and was given Independence quite a few years ago. When Spain lost it we had a treaty to have navel bases there. We did not rule or own the country. Cuba became a protecterate when Spain was defeated in the Spanish American War, and gained Independence after a few years. The territories we still have are territories by their choice and are not exploited for our gain nor do we rule them. They are self governing.
I grant you that no one asked the native population of the continental North America if they wanted to become the United States.

Flag 0 rate up
stewmehlhaff March 19 2014 at 3:09 PM

VP Joe, say it ain't so! Go ahead draw another red line for your boss and then when Putin spits over it, draw another one. What do we expect with these two clowns (Barack/Joe) in office!

Flag Reply +7 rate up
findrobin March 19 2014 at 5:09 PM

Go Putin...

Flag Reply +2 rate up
amiedread March 19 2014 at 4:18 PM

For those of you that want military action, join the US Army!!!

Flag Reply +5 rate up
aol~~ 1209600


More From Our Partners