nb_cid nb_clickOther -tt-nb this.style.behavior='url(#default#homepage)';this.setHomePage('http://www.aol.com/?mtmhp=acm50ieupgradebanner_112313 network-banner-empty upgradeBanner
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
AOL Favorites

General chokes up as he details affair during plea

FORT BRAGG, N.C. (AP) -- An Army general who admitted to improper relationships with three subordinates appeared to choke up Monday as he told a judge that he'd failed the female captain who had leveled the most serious accusations against him.

Hours later, she took the stand to testify about how she can't trust people and fears her superiors are always going to take advantage of her in the aftermath of the three-year affair.

As he pleaded guilty, Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair's voice halted when telling the judge why he was pleading guilty to mistreating her in a deal that included the dropping of sexual assault charges.

"I failed her as a leader and as a mentor and caused harm to her emotional state," Sinclair said, his voice catching as he read from a statement. He asked the judge for a break and took a long drink of water before continuing to read.

"I created a situation over time that caused her emotional harm," Sinclair said, seated in his dress blue uniform. It was the first public show of regret or sadness for a 27-year veteran who had betrayed little emotion in court hearings over the past year.

The judge accepted Sinclair's guilty pleas on several lesser charges in a deal that includes the dropping of sexual assault counts and two others that may have required him to register as a sex offender.

The sentencing hearing for Sinclair, the former deputy commander of the 82nd Airborne Division, began Monday afternoon and was expected to last until at least the next day. As many as two-dozen witnesses could be called and Sinclair's lawyer said he will either give a statement or testify.

Ultimately, the judge will give Sinclair a sentence that can't exceed terms in the agreement struck between defense lawyers and military attorneys over the weekend, but has not been made public. The legal agreement is likely to require a punishment far less severe than the maximum penalties of 21 1/2 years in prison and dismissal from the Army.

Sinclair's lawyer suggested he might walk out of court a free man, but without a career and perhaps with hundreds of thousands of dollars less in pension benefits.

"I hope he is permitted to retire at a reduced rank and can go home to his family," defense attorney Richard Scheff said before court started Monday.

Sinclair, 51, had been accused of twice forcing the female captain under his command to perform oral sex during the three-year extramarital affair. The Associated Press does not generally identify those who say they were victims of sexual assault.

The married general pleaded guilty earlier this month to having improper relationships with three subordinate officers, including the captain. He also pleaded guilty to adultery, which is a crime in the military.

The most serious accusations went to trial, but the court-martial was halted after the military judge found evidence that there may have been improper influence in a decision to reject a previous plea deal. The new deal was then struck, including Sinclair's admission that his treatment of the captain was "unwarranted, unjustified and unnecessary," broke military law and mentally harmed her.

Sinclair also admitted on Monday to abusing a government credit card he used while traveling to visit his mistress, using indecent language to demean female officers and contacting the accuser after being told not to.

After his plea, prosecutors opened the sentencing by calling the accuser back to the stand. She remains on active duty and was granted an immunity deal with prosecutors in exchange for testimony.

She said her career has suffered because she constantly worries her supervisors are talking about her behind her back and trying to undermine her.

"I'm very guarded now. I have a hard time trusting people. I have a very hard time feeling safe," said the woman, who cried during testimony and occasionally dabbed her eyes with a tissue between questions.

She never looked at Sinclair, but looked directly at prosecutors as she was questioned. When the lawyers would talk directly to the judge between questions, she looked down at her hands.

The female officer's mother testified that since making the accusations, her daughter bought a 95-pound dog for protection and sleeps on her couch in her four-bedroom home with a loaded gun nearby because she is scared.

In court on Monday, Sinclair denied ever putting his hands on the captain in anger. He said about a year into the affair, he began to realize that the captain wanted a complete relationship, while he was not going to leave his wife. Sinclair said the captain was "emotionally invested in a way I was not."

The general said he started using tactics to try to keep the captain from revealing a relationship that broke military law both because Sinclair was married and a superior officer.

He lied and said he planned to divorce his wife to keep the captain hoping for something more. And he started flirting with other women in hopes that the captain would leave quietly, he said.

Sinclair said his actions were "not based on my honest feelings for her, but were based on my fear of exposure."

Prosecutors have not spoken outside court since the plea deal was disclosed over the weekend.

The Army's case against Sinclair started to crumble as questions arose about whether his primary accuser had lied in a pre-trial hearing. It was further thrown into jeopardy last week when Judge Col. James Pohl said the military may have improperly pressed ahead with the trial to send a message about its determination to curb rape and other widespread misconduct. Under the military code of justice, the decision was supposed to be decided solely on the evidence, not its broader political implications.

Capt. Cassie L. Fowler, the military lawyer assigned to represent the accuser's interests, declined to talk about the case outside court Monday. She referred questions to another attorney who advised the woman, retired Navy Rear Admiral Jamie Barnett.

A statement issued by Barnett said that the woman stands by her assault accusation.

Barnett said that Sinclair "literally sabotaged her career by altering her orders to keep her under his command and refusing her many requests to be transferred. She was literally trapped and bullied by one of the highest ranking officers in the United States Army."

Join the discussion

1000|Char. 1000  Char.
jimrivratt March 18 2014 at 11:17 AM

of course he will get a lesser punishment because of his rank better treatment than an enlisted one get. It has always been like this in the military

Flag Reply +6 rate up
2 replies
posthuf jimrivratt March 18 2014 at 11:59 AM

And what punishment will she get after 3 years of carrying on the affair??????

Flag Reply +1 rate up
ewa2021830 jimrivratt March 18 2014 at 12:18 PM

and out of the military too.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
Still March 18 2014 at 9:24 AM

The woman in this case was just as bad, she should be kicked out.

Flag Reply +6 rate up
1 reply
poll100 Still March 18 2014 at 9:50 AM

She was sleeping with a married man, a disgrace to every woman who leads a decent life. She should be demoted or whatever they do,

Flag Reply +1 rate up
Marcia Wickert March 18 2014 at 9:27 AM

Why does he get breaks that would be denied to lesser officers? He should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the crime, not being allowed, possibly, to go free, retire, and go home. His victim will never be able to feel comfortable again in society, especially the military.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
jakhammer43 March 18 2014 at 2:05 AM

The real issue is----Its not the adultery--its abuse of power as a higher ranking officer with a subordinate under his command......that has always been a problem in the military--and always will be--in this specific case-and scenario==-because men and women serve together..

Flag Reply +1 rate up
1 reply
Tara Sawyer jakhammer43 March 18 2014 at 3:02 AM


Flag Reply 0 rate up
roman889 March 18 2014 at 11:01 AM

Sexual miscunduct in the military has been an ongoing problem for such a very long time. It didn't just appear overnight. It becomes even more accute in a combat environment and many times the male is really not the aggressor but the victim. Been there, done that and fortunately it was short lived due to termination of assignment which began late in the tour. Needless to say, it is an ego builder in some respects because it makes you feel like you really matter after all. In my situation, I was not the agressor but on the receiving end of the affair. Nothing came of it because it was agreed that there would never be another meeting. We were both enlisted, she a subordinate and we never met again. It has become a memory of the distant past.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
1 reply
Marshall & Co. roman889 March 18 2014 at 11:25 AM

Some of these cases recently appear to be a method of the present administration to rift important leaders out of the military that do not believe in the present administration's policies and are concerned we are headed down a very dangerous path. It is obviously very difficult to separate men and women in a foreign country in a very dangerous war zone when each other is all they have. I question what is going on in our military and if it is in a process of being disabled in many ways.......

Flag Reply +3 rate up
rchavezzzz March 17 2014 at 7:26 PM

So, when you are high ranking and have connections you can go home with your family, and no martial court or anthing else, I guess that's why everybody wants to be the #1

Flag Reply +3 rate up
pianomanref March 18 2014 at 9:27 AM

Bust this jerk. Give him a dishonorable discharge and no pension. He is only sorry he got caught.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
Laird Wilcox March 18 2014 at 1:38 AM

The military is one of the few places in American society where adultery is still a crime. Many states have taken if off of their statute books and none of them still prosecute it. This gives the military enormous leverage to prosecute people -- primarily men -- who simply succumb to a human weakness with a willing partner. In this case the "victim" was given a choice of testifying against the defendant or facing charges herself. She may not have wanted to. It was "you destroy his life or we'll destroy yours."

Much of the pressure to pursue cases like this comes from politicians and feminist interest groups. It's a tough thing when one party to a romance gets disappointed but to take that and use it to destroy military careers, their families and even the military itself with the loss of their training and ability is a terrible idea. If there are actual serious damages they could be pursued in a civil court.

Flag Reply +3 rate up
2 replies
Melrensckit Laird Wilcox March 18 2014 at 2:38 AM

Do those "who simply succumb to a human weakness with a willing partner" even belong in the military??? These people are supposed to be incredibly disciplined and yet they can't say no?

Flag Reply 0 rate up
pruettee Laird Wilcox March 18 2014 at 2:48 AM

Thank you Laird Wilcox. The only good comment I have read. Just remember it is a two way street. Women and men pressure others.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
ttrestorations March 18 2014 at 10:55 AM

Get a haircut, trim those sideburns, and get a shave, soldier.
You're out of uniform.
That's the problem...

Flag Reply +2 rate up
herrshultz March 17 2014 at 7:31 PM

The only time most of these individuals cry foul is when using the situation for self gain no longer works. I know of a few cases where officer/enlisted fratinization and NCO/junior enlisted caused undo harm to other careers. This sort of crap has been going on in all services for centuries and the only time you ever hear it blown up like this is when there is political gain of some sort or as said before the looser in the situation is seeking revenge. Didn't bother either of them when it was fun and they were getting what they wanted, and there is most likely a few folks didn't get promoted because they didn't have his or her attention. Most server honorably, but as in the real world if you can't get ahead because of your intelligence and hard work afew use the oldest comodity in the book. She was part of all the good stuff for her didn't bother her then whats going to happen to her?????? She and the others should fry also they are no better than him for even getting involved. But we'll never see true justice will we?

Flag Reply +2 rate up
aol~~ 1209600


More From Our Partners