nb_cid nb_clickOther -tt-nb this.style.behavior='url(#default#homepage)';this.setHomePage('http://www.aol.com/?mtmhp=acm50ieupgradebanner_112313 network-banner-empty upgradeBanner
14
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
Video
Video
AOL Favorites
Favorites
Menu

Owners of recalled GM cars feel angry, vindicated

General Motors Co. To Recall 1.3 Million Vehicles to Repair Steering

(Reuters) - As details emerge about how General Motors Co dealt with faulty ignition switches in some of its models, car owners are increasingly angry after learning that the automaker knowingly allowed them to drive defective vehicles.

Saturn Ion owner Nancy Bowman of Washington, Michigan, said she is outraged that GM allowed her to drive a "death trap." She said her car had so many ignition problems she was afraid to resell it to an innocent buyer.

She bought the 2004 model car new and still drives it after extensive repairs and multiple run-ins with a Saturn dealer she called dismissive.

"Five times the car died right out from under me after hitting a bump in the road," she wrote in a 2013 posting on a complaint website, arfc.org, that says it sends information to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

"Every time I brought it in they said it was an isolated incident. Couldn't find the problem, so they acted like I was an idiot."

GM recalled 1.6 million cars last month because a faulty ignition switch could turn off a car's engine, disable its airbags and make steering difficult. The recall involves six models from years ranging from 2003 to 2007. The problem has been linked to 12 deaths, the company says.

Documents released by GM this week revealed that the automaker knew about the ignition problem as early as 2001. Auto safety advocates say GM should have ordered a recall years ago, and GM has apologized as investigations by government agencies, Congress and the company itself have multiplied.

Angry customers are taking to social media to vent their frustrations. GM's companyFacebook "fan page" is scattered with complaints amid enthusiasts' comments and the company's updates on its activities. Comments on one post this week featuring a photo of a proud owner and his "Chevy Family" of three cars included sarcastic references about the recall.

The financial costs of the recall and GM's legal liability are still being calculated.

Under terms of its 2009 bankruptcy, the "new" GM is not responsible for any legal claims relating to incidents that took place before July 2009. But GM is facing pressure from some consumer groups that say the arrangement would be unfair to victims and want the automaker to establish a trust fund to pay compensation.

Since the recall, GM has said its customers' safety and satisfaction are top priorities.

"We are deeply sorry to our customers and for the circumstances surrounding this recall. We are doing all we can today to take care of our customers and to ensure their peace of mind," GM spokesman Greg Martin said.

GM North America President Alan Batey acknowledged last month that the length of time between the first reports of a possible defect and the recall announcement "shows that the process employed to examine this phenomenon was not as robust as it should have been."

LONG SILENCE

The company's long silence has outraged those who endured poor service or worse.

Megan Phillips, who was the driver of a 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt that crashed in Wisconsin, said that until last month's recall she blamed herself for a 2006 accident in which two teenaged friends were killed when her car left the road and hit a clump of trees.

Accident investigators hired by the NHTSA found that the key had moved to the "accessory" rather than the "run" position, turning off the engine and disabling the airbags before impact. None of the girls wore seatbelts.

Phillips, 24, said that the families of her deceased friends blamed her for the crash and would not talk to her. Since the recall, Phillips said, they have begun communicating.

"I don't have the answer for them. GM has the answer for them," she said.

Phillips said she does not understand why GM did not order a recall earlier.

"I don't understand why they would wait 10 years to say something. And I want to understand it but I never will."

"REALLY RIDICULOUS"

As part of the recall, the automaker has offered $500 to owners toward buying or leasing another GM car. The recall involves 2005-2007 Chevrolet Cobalt and Pontiac G5 compact cars, 2003-2007 Saturn Ion compact cars, 2006-2007 Chevy HHR midsized cars, and 2006-2007 Pontiac Solstice and Saturn Sky sports cars.

Mike Andrews, an attorney with the Alabama firm Beasley Allen, which is weighing possible recall-related lawsuits, called GM's response "really ridiculous."

"They've known about this for years, and their response is $500," Andrews said.

Even after repairs, GM warns customers to use only the key and fob on the key ring. The weight on the key is believed to be one of the causes of the ignition jarring out of the "run" position.

The NHTSA has opened a probe into the timing of the recall, and two congressional committees plan to hold hearings. The FBI and the U.S. attorney in Manhattan are also investigating.

GM has said it is fully cooperating.

GM Chief Executive Officer Mary Barra, an engineer who took the job in January, has apologized publicly and started an internal investigation.

Fitch Ratings said in a note on Friday that the recall and federal probe may pose a risk to GM's reputation but are not likely to be a financial burden. Fitch said lawsuits could pose more of a problem for GM.

Attorney Robert Hilliard of the Texas firm Hilliard Munoz Gonzales, who is representing Phillips and other families of victims in the Wisconsin crash, said GM owners now contacting him are angered by "the insidiousness of hiding the defect."

"We're developing coalitions and associations to help in this battle," he said.

A proposed class action lawsuit was filed against GM in federal court in Texas on Friday. It claims GM knew about the problem since 2004 but failed to fix it, creating "unreasonably dangerous" conditions for drivers of the affected models.

Dennis Hillstead, a former St. Croix County sheriff who investigated the Phillips accident, said it appears "someone dropped the ball" on alerting the public.

"It's a sad commentary, perhaps, on large corporations that fail to take the public's well-being into consideration when making their decisions," he said.

(Reporting by Eric Beech; Additional reporting by Marilyn W. Thompson in Washington and Jessica Dye in New York, editing by Peter Henderson and Lisa Shumaker)

Join the discussion

1000|Characters 1000  Characters
Youre so cute March 17 2014 at 5:39 PM

I owned a POS GMC Yukon from 2002 - both the Roswell GA dealership and GM HQ have lost my business through their lack of moral fiber. NEVER again will I own a GM nor will my family

Flag Reply +1 rate up
Quality Power March 17 2014 at 5:35 PM

Will NEVER own a Ford or a GM vehicle again. I switched to Chrysler and have not had a single issue with my truck. (Knock on wood).Worked in the Repair industry for 35 yrs and don't like the way Ford and GM build their trucks. Don't feel safe in then. I had an 02 Silverado and it left me stranded with my 5th wheel more then once. A ford dealer pissed my off so bad I will never set foot on their lot again.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
Tell a Story! March 17 2014 at 4:46 PM

Hmm, Was j ust looking to buy a car, was considering a chevy. Not now.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
IN MY OPINION ONLY March 17 2014 at 5:07 PM

"Every time I brought it in they said it was an isolated incident. Couldn't find the problem, so they acted like I was an idiot." - GM BUYER

GM's CEO and Obama's an Idiot?

Flag Reply +2 rate up
jchiqu8536 March 17 2014 at 2:13 PM

these people in gm say they are putting out a better product , its all a ruse to sale these junk cars to make obama look good.

Flag Reply +6 rate up
1 reply
jdgwillowtree jchiqu8536 March 17 2014 at 3:04 PM

Most of these vehicles were produced before Obama was President. What, now you gonna blame Bush since he was the president? Huh!

Flag Reply +2 rate up
A.D Alge March 17 2014 at 12:55 PM

Where are the Gov. Regulaters who have a GOOD job, GOOD PAY, They spend too much time going fishing and playing golf, to investigate the AUTO CO. They are YEARS behind in there work to KEEP the AUTO Business running in a strait LINE. I think it could have been a Bush Problem, or it May have been George Washington Problem. Us Indians Never did LIKE the Goverment. Tell ME one GOOD thing they Have DONE. Signing Out Dwight Litefoot

Flag Reply +3 rate up
taurus7125 March 17 2014 at 2:06 PM

Is it safe to say GM knew that the deal was against the law and the government can make GM still pay all those who died or were injured? Maybe the government was in on the deal also. I think those that made the deal should also be charged for conspiracy in that they knew or should have known what GM was trying to pull.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
hugo March 17 2014 at 1:04 PM

I bought a 2913 LT2 Malibu for 32,000 fropm Betten Chevolet in Muskegon MI, and have had nothing but problems. I had to replace 2 wheel bearings on a new car , it locked in gear and tookm them 7 days to vigure out why. The front light fell out driving down the highway. It hits botton when pulluing uot of steep driveways. I tried to trade it back in sveral times, and they ofered me 13,000 what a joke. Don't by a Chevy onless you like getting screwed.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
1 reply
hedunlap hugo March 17 2014 at 2:30 PM

Sad to hear that the GM cars of the future are going to be junk also. I am surprise that GM will still be around and that cars will still have wheel bearings.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
acdinc1 March 17 2014 at 1:39 PM

When I purchased a 1999 GM Suburban 1500 with all the bells and whistles, it was my last GM purchase ever. I should have gone to court under the "lemon law", but I sucked it up and paid an additional $6,000 in two years to fix all the problems on this car "out-of-the-box". The worst thing the feds ever did was keeping companies that can't compete in business. This promotes mediocrity in our businesses, education and other institutions, where in a generation or less we will be a third rate country. Some think we are already there. Thank you Mr. President.

Oh by the way, I now own three foreign vehicles all of which have never been in the shop. I purchased them in 2005, 2008, and 2010. My new motto is: don't buy domestic.

Flag Reply +5 rate up
richtermusk March 17 2014 at 12:55 PM

I purchased a 2006 Chevy HHR LT, paid cash....and purchased extended warranty at purchase time.
I have had frequent times when the power has dimmed dash-lights to almost nil, when I first start car and also while driving down the road the lights dim and dash goes dark!! Also, so many times when could not put the car in gear as the release switch would not disengage the "park" lock . I could hear the "click" sound it makes to release the park lock....but nothing. Had to keep turning the car off and on and eventually it would release and I could put car in gear. Have asked several times to have it checked out at the dealership, and was told " we can not tell what is wrong unless it happens when we have it ". Also, as my 2006 is part of this ignition recall, I wonder why I have not been contacted to bring my car in ?? I have had a multitude of other functional issues with my HHR that has resulted in frequent "warranty" repairs. Ever hear of the term " FRIDAY CAR" ? It is referring to cars assembled on Friday when workers are in a big hurry to reach quota and get out of there for the weekend...basically a Friday car has MORE " fix-it" issues. This is provable by having the VIN number of the vehicle checked out.. it shows the day of assembly completion. FRIDAY CAR == LEMON!!

Flag Reply +2 rate up
4 replies
aol~~ 1209600

Voting...

More From Our Partners