nb_cid nb_clickOther -tt-nb this.style.behavior='url(#default#homepage)';this.setHomePage('http://www.aol.com/?mtmhp=acmpolicybanner072814 network-banner-promo mtmhpBanner
14
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
Video
Video
AOL Favorites
Favorites
Menu

Piracy theory gains more credence in mystery of missing Flight MH 370



KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia (AP) -- Piracy and pilot suicide are among the scenarios under study as investigators grow increasingly certain the missing Malaysia Airlines jet changed course and headed west after its last radio contact with air traffic controllers.

The latest evidence suggests the plane didn't experience a catastrophic incident over the South China Sea as was initially suspected. Some experts theorize that one of the pilots, or someone else with flying experience, hijacked the plane or committed suicide by plunging the jet into the sea.

Adding to the speculation that someone was flying the jet, The New York Times on Friday quoted sources familiar with the investigation as saying that the plane experienced significant changes in altitude after it lost contact with ground control, and altered its course more than once.

A U.S. official told The Associated Press earlier that investigators are examining the possibility of "human intervention" in the plane's disappearance, adding it may have been "an act of piracy." The official, who wasn't authorized to talk to the media and spoke on condition of anonymity, said it was possible the plane may have landed somewhere. The official later said there was no solid information on who might have been involved.

While other theories are still being examined, the official said key evidence suggesting human intervention is that contact with the Boeing 777's transponder stopped about a dozen minutes before a messaging system on the jet quit. Such a gap would be unlikely in the case of an in-flight catastrophe.

A Malaysian official, who declined to be identified because he is not authorized to brief the media, said only a skilled aviator could navigate the plane the way it was flown after its last confirmed location over the South China Sea. The official said it had been established with a "more than 50 percent" degree of certainty that military radar had picked up the missing plane after it dropped off civilian radar.

Malaysia's acting transport minister, Hishammuddin Hussein, said the country had yet to determine what happened to the plane after it ceased communicating with ground control about 40 minutes into the flight to Beijing on March 8 with 239 people aboard.

He said investigators were still trying to establish that military radar records of a blip moving west across the Malay Peninsula into the Strait of Malacca showed Flight MH370.

"I will be the most happiest person if we can actually confirm that it is the MH370, then we can move all (search) assets from the South China Sea to the Strait of Malacca," he told reporters. Until then, he said, the international search effort would continue expanding east and west from the plane's last confirmed location.

Though some investigators are now convinced that "human intervention" caused the disappearance, U.S. officials told the White House at a briefing Friday that they have "run all the traps" and come up with no good information on who might been involved, according to an official familiar with the meeting. The meeting was attended by State and Defense Department officials, the CIA, the Federal Aviation Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board, among others.

"I don't think there is any consensus on a theory," the official said. "They're not hearing anything in their surveillance that would indicate that this is part of a plot."

Another U.S. official, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, said investigators looking for the plane have run out of clues except for a type of satellite data that has never been used before to find a missing plane, and is very inexact.

The data consists of attempts by an Inmarsat satellite to identify a broad area where the plane might be in case a messaging system aboard the plane should need to connect with the satellite, said the official. The official compared the location attempts, called a "handshake," to someone driving around with their cellphone not in use. As the phone from passes from the range of one cellphone tower to another, the towers note that the phone is in range in case messages need to be sent.

In the case of the Malaysian plane, there were successful attempts by the satellite to roughly locate the Boeing 777 about once an hour over four to five hours, the official said. "This is all brand new to us," the official said. "We've never had to use satellite handshaking as the best possible source of information."

The handshake does not transmit any data on the plane's altitude, airspeed or other information that might help in locating it, the official said. Instead, searchers are trying to use the handshakes to triangulate the general area of where the plane last was known to have been at the last satellite check, the official said.

"It is telling us the airplane was continuing to operate," the official said, plus enough information on location so that the satellite will know how many degrees to turn to adjust its antenna to pick up any messages from the plane.

The official confirmed prior reports that following the loss of contact with the plane's transponder, the plane turned west. A transponder emits signals that are picked up by radar providing a unique identifier for each plane along with altitude. Malaysian military radar continued to pick up the plane as a whole "paintskin" - a radar blip that has no unique identifier - until it traveled beyond the reach of radar, which is about 320 kilometers (200 miles) offshore, the official said.

The New York Times, quoting American officials and others familiar with the investigation, said radar signals recorded by the Malaysian military appear to show the airliner climbing to 45,000 feet (about 13,700 meters), higher than a Boeing 777's approved limit, soon after it disappeared from civilian radar, and making a sharp turn to the west. The radar track then shows the plane descending unevenly to an altitude of 23,000 feet (7,000 meters), below normal cruising levels, before rising again and flying northwest over the Strait of Malacca toward the Indian Ocean, the Times reported.

Scores of aircraft and ships from 12 countries are involved in the search, which reaches into the eastern stretches of the South China Sea and on the western side of the Malay Peninsula, northwest into the Andaman Sea and the Indian Ocean.

India said it was using heat sensors on flights over hundreds of Andaman Sea islands Friday and would expand the search for the missing jet farther west into the Bay of Bengal, more than 1,600 kilometers (about 1,000 miles) to the west of the plane's last known position.

A team of five U.S. officials with air traffic control and radar expertise - three from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board and two from the Federal Aviation Administration - has been in Kuala Lumpur since Monday to assist with the investigation.

White House spokesman Jay Carney sidestepped questions Friday about the possibility of human intervention in the plane disappearance, saying only that U.S. officials were assisting in the investigation.

Malaysia has faced accusations it isn't sharing all its information or suspicions about the plane's final movements. It insists it is being open, and says it would be irresponsible to narrow the focus of the search until there is undeniable evidence of the plane's flight path.

At this point, there is no evidence of any wrongdoing on the part of the two pilots, though Malaysian police have said they are looking at their psychological background, their family life and connections.

Zaharie Ahmad Shah, 53, and Fariq Abdul Hamid, 27, have both been described as respectable, community-minded men.

Mike Glynn, a committee member of the Australian and International Pilots Association, said he considers pilot suicide to be the most likely explanation for the disappearance, as was suspected in a SilkAir crash during a flight from Singapore to Jakarta in 1997 and an EgyptAir flight in 1999.

"A pilot rather than a hijacker is more likely to be able to switch off the communications equipment," Glynn said. "The last thing that I, as a pilot, want is suspicion to fall on the crew, but it's happened twice before."

--

Lowy reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Ashok Sharma in New Delhi, Jim Gomez in Kuala Lumpur, and Rod McGuirk in Canberra, Australia, contributed to this report.

Join the discussion

1000|Char. 1000  Char.
PSALMS 91 March 15 2014 at 3:03 AM

So were calling it Piracy now?

Flag Reply +3 rate up
loser1leo March 14 2014 at 8:14 PM

I was wondering if by chance could some in the plane tried to use a cell if the message sent, if sent where did the transmission go, just a thought

Flag Reply +2 rate up
1 reply
paulaflyhigh loser1leo March 14 2014 at 8:59 PM

That's the problem stated by all on TV - there were NO cell calls or messages sent. None at all!!

Flag Reply 0 rate up
Monkey! March 15 2014 at 1:02 AM

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/malaysia-airlines-flight-370-divert-andaman-islands-article-1.1721523 they are saying "hijacking" conclusive

Flag Reply +1 rate up
1 reply
etrouble03 Monkey! March 15 2014 at 1:05 AM

yeah AP and USA Today also reporting same

Flag Reply +1 rate up
1 reply
Monkey! etrouble03 March 15 2014 at 1:09 AM

I have to say I felt this from the beginning ... stolen passport guys (check out what one of them posted on his FB page, last post) + pilot that spends free time 'playing' on a simulator + lack of security + areas where there are no cell phone coverage =

Flag +3 rate up
rspooner001 March 15 2014 at 1:01 AM

Until there is at least some credible evidence that the pilot or co-pilot were experiencing personal or mental problems before this flight, I don't think it is right to be speculatively pointing a finger at them as a likely cause of the disappearance. That said, this episode is extremely weird. It is surprising that the plane's flight path has not been reconstructed almost to the minute by the various civilian, military and satellite radar systems available today.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
zorro205 March 14 2014 at 8:28 PM

God help them all

Flag Reply +9 rate up
suncruzma March 14 2014 at 8:32 PM

this is hard to explain I would like to think they landed some where wether through abduction or other wise and are alive and well. It is hard to believe nothing has been found in the waters or bursting flames in the sky. someone knows something

Flag Reply +2 rate up
1 reply
Wilton Firewood suncruzma March 14 2014 at 8:45 PM

But what about the worker on the oil rig who DID see what he described as a burning plane in the vicinity of where the plane turned? No one has followed up on this man at all.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
2 replies
paulaflyhigh Wilton Firewood March 14 2014 at 8:49 PM

I wondered that myself!

Flag 0 rate up
bmwrjw Wilton Firewood March 14 2014 at 9:21 PM

You do not know that. They do not tell everyone everything. A lot of people like to report things to bring attention to themselves. They have a big job to do, finding this plane. I doubt anyone cares about all the speculation on this and other sites. They are focused on doing what needs to be done and much wiser people than any of us are working to do whatever they can to solve this mystery.

Flag +2 rate up
bengaye March 14 2014 at 8:33 PM

I find it interesting that we have all of these theories about what may have happened to that commercial jet. Something that nobody has brought up is the cockpit door. After 9/11 wasn’t there a change in door structures of all commercial airliners? As an extra safety precaution so that these potential hijackings would have a more difficult time accessing the cockpit. Aren’t cockpits of these airliners equipped with any type of self-defense weapons on board?

Flag Reply +4 rate up
1 reply
louqlou bengaye March 14 2014 at 8:47 PM

Who knows? What about tracking the cell phones that were still on when it disappeard. We have the technology to find and track the location so whats up?

Flag Reply +1 rate up
mybunkey March 14 2014 at 9:36 PM

Why don't they put a second transponder in the rear of the plane which can only be accessed by the ground crew. That transponder would have two functions. ns monitoring everything going on ij thr pilot's cabin, from conversation to control settings. It would be inaccessable to the pilots, flght engineers or terrorists who have even managed to go to our flight training and get a job with an air line company. They would be educated to the fact that there was no way they could keep the second transponder from recording the data. With that in mind, even if they forced the pilot to disconnect the transponder, the plane would still be in touch with the any space that they are fling in. ANY THOUGHTS ON THAT?

.

Flag Reply +10 rate up
6 replies
Ghetto Cat March 15 2014 at 12:54 AM

"Alright. Goodnight." equals: We are being forced to turn right and fly 8 hours away.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
GERANNIE March 15 2014 at 12:51 AM

I said this all alonge. They are on the ground somewhere. Thank God. I hope they are safe.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
aol~~ 1209600

Voting...

More From Our Partners