nb_cid nb_clickOther -tt-nb this.style.behavior='url(#default#homepage)';this.setHomePage('http://www.aol.com/?mtmhp=acmpolicybanner072814 network-banner-promo mtmhpBanner
14
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
Video
Video
AOL Favorites
Favorites
Menu

Nj teen suing parents won't get immediate support



BY DAVID PORTER
AP

MORRISTOWN, N.J. (AP) -- A northern New Jersey honor student who has sued to get her parents to support her after she moved out of their home had her initial request denied Tuesday by a judge who cautioned that the case could lead to a "potentially slippery slope" of claims by teenagers against their parents.

Rachel Canning had sought immediate relief in the form of $650 in weekly child support and the payment of the remainder of her tuition at Morris Catholic High School, as well as attorney's fees.

State Superior Court Judge Peter Bogaard denied those motions but ordered the parties to return to court on April 22, when they will present evidence and testimony on the over-arching question of whether the Cannings are obligated to financially support their daughter. Rachel Canning, a high school senior, has already been accepted by at least one college and is seeking to have her parents pay some or all of her tuition, attorney Tanya Helfand told Bogaard Tuesday.

Dressed in her school uniform and with several friends in the gallery, Rachel Canning didn't speak to reporters after the hearing.

Bogaard sounded skeptical of some of the claims in the lawsuit, saying it could lead to teens "thumbing their noses" at their parents, leaving home and then asking for financial support.

"Are we going to open the gates for 12-year-olds to sue for an Xbox? For 13-year-olds to sue for an iPhone?" he asked. "We should be mindful of a potentially slippery slope."

Court documents show frequent causes of parent-teenage tension - boyfriends and alcohol - taken to an extreme. In the filings, there are accusations and denials, but one thing is clear: the girl left home Oct. 30, two days before she turned 18 after a tumultuous stretch during which her parents separated and reconciled and the teen began getting into uncharacteristic trouble at school.

In court filings, Canning's parents, retired Lincoln Park police Chief Sean Canning and his wife, Elizabeth, said their daughter voluntarily left home because she didn't want to abide by reasonable household rules, such as being respectful, keeping a curfew, doing a few chores and ending a relationship with a boyfriend her parents say is a bad influence. They say that shortly before she turned 18, she told her parents that she would be an adult and could do whatever she wanted.

She said her parents are abusive, contributed to an eating disorder she developed and pushed her to get a basketball scholarship. They say they were supportive, helped her through the eating disorder and paid for her to go to a private school where she would not get as much playing time in basketball as she would have at a public school.

Helfand told Bogaard in court Tuesday that Rachel Canning learned her behavior from her parents, particularly her mother, with whom she has a difficult relationship.

"These people who call themselves loving parents paint the most disgusting portrait of their daughter" in the court filings, she said. "They are pointing the finger to avoid their parental responsibilities."

A cheerleader and lacrosse player who hopes to become a biomedical engineer, Canning wants the judge to declare that she's non-emancipated and dependent as a student on her parents for support

Attorney Laurie Rush-Masuret, representing the Canning parents, called Rachel Canning's claims "outrageous" and said that by leaving - and by the fact that she is 18 - Rachel Canning "emancipated herself" and shouldn't count on her parents' support.

"There is no abuse. There is no neglect," she said. "They are not unfit parents. She could come home tonight."

Rachel Canning has been living in Rockaway Township with the family of her best friend. The friend's father, former Morris County Freeholder John Inglesino, is paying for the lawsuit.

Judge Says Parents Not Responsible For Daughter's Finances

Join the discussion

1000|Char. 1000  Char.
murrayfuentes March 06 2014 at 12:30 PM

"She said her parents are abusive, contributed to an eating disorder she developed and pushed her to get a basketball scholarship."
OMG, they pushed her to get a basketball scholarship! Wow, that's the clincher right there!
What a spoiled brat. If she had been brought up with my parents, she probably would have committed suicide. And there are LOTS worse than them. Grow up, little girl! Everything you want will NOT just be handed to you! You might as well learn that now.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
Vinny Cottam March 06 2014 at 8:26 AM

I'm sure she wasn't the one that thought of sueing her parents.
This generation is made up of people like this that think everyone owes them something and
they have to do nothing to get it.The bottom line is if you have the balls to turn your back on your parents and want to be treated like an adult, get a job and a little backbone and face the adult world.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
1 reply
murrayfuentes Vinny Cottam March 06 2014 at 12:31 PM

EXACTLY!

Flag Reply 0 rate up
onemadashell March 06 2014 at 8:17 AM

they do no t owe you anything once you graduate from high school.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
Ron March 06 2014 at 1:08 AM

This girl's got a cause only a coddled, ungrateful child could support.

Flag Reply +7 rate up
NoShark March 06 2014 at 2:10 AM

Well, they c,ould be crappy parents. It is possible. And it doesn't matter. They have the right to decide what they will monetarily compensate in their children. If they beat the snot out of her, the state can prosecute them as child abusers. But parental obligations monetarily are those the parent chooses to condone. The cheek of this girl in demanding payment from parents, for having her, is of course brought to public scrutiny by one of thousands of grasping lawyers. The interference in the affairs of the family by the father of a friend, is outrageous.

Flag Reply +7 rate up
mrcorrie63 March 06 2014 at 1:18 AM

Unbelievable! What a spoiled brat!

Flag Reply +6 rate up
boku2 March 06 2014 at 12:38 AM

I think the attorney is hoping to win the case. You know the girl is not paying this sleaze ball. Figuring can make a name for himself if he wins it will be a landmark decision which will eventually go to the Supreme court. However I'm hoping that it will be kicked out like the little bimbo who brought this to her parents. (when it's over I hope her parents have nothing to do with her) I like this quote;
"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers." ~~King Henry VI Act IV Scene II ~Shakespeare

Flag Reply +2 rate up
welcome Richard March 06 2014 at 12:36 AM

Thank you Judge Bogaard for being a voice of reason.

Flag Reply +6 rate up
doransdome2 March 06 2014 at 1:20 AM

The kid want to be an adult, let her act like one. Guess she'll have to get loans for college like most of the students do. I know all my kids/grandkids did.

Flag Reply +13 rate up
Suzanne March 06 2014 at 1:05 AM

Who the hell does this kid think she is?? If she dies tonight, she will find fault with St. Peter at the Pearly Gates. That's the usual case with pampered brats.....

Flag Reply +3 rate up
1 reply
stanleycorp1 Suzanne March 06 2014 at 1:27 AM

OH come on!! - FIND FAULT WITH ST PETER!???? How presumptuous... She would clearly sue him for not letting her in!!!!

Flag Reply +2 rate up
aol~~ 1209600

Voting...

More From Our Partners