Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
AOL Favorites

Canada Beats U.S. 3-2 In Olympic Women's Hockey Round-Robin Game

2014 Winter Olympics: Controversial Loss for U.S. Women's Hockey

SOCHI, Russia (AP) - The puck trickled under Jesse Vetter's pads and over the goal line, and then the whistle blew.

Or was it the other way around?

The Canadian women's hockey team beat the United States 3-2 on Wednesday in a tense preview of the expected gold medal match, taking the lead on Hayley Wickenheiser's controversial third-period goal. Meghan Agosta scored in the second period to tie the game 1-1, and then Canada added the go-ahead goal 93 seconds later on a shot that U.S. goalie Jesse Vetter seemed to have stopped, drawing a whistle from referee Anna Eskola of Finland.

But the puck slid through Vetter's pads and over the goal line. A video - and presumably audio - review confirmed the puck went into the net before the whistle.

"You celebrate when you see the puck cross the line," said Wickenheiser, who is participating in her fifth Winter Games. "It doesn't matter how."

But Vetter said she thought the whistle had blown before the puck came loose. American coach Katey Stone was even more sure of it.

"I did hear a whistle blow before the puck went in," she said. "But, more importantly, I said to our players, 'Regardless of what happens, let's be ready.'"

They weren't.

The Americans allowed Meghan Agosta to break into the zone by herself and beat Vetter with just over five minutes remaining - the second goal of the game for the MVP of the 2010 Olympics - giving Canada a 3-1 lead. The U.S. pulled the goalie and cut the deficit to one on Anne Schleper's goal with 65 seconds left, but even with a power play that gave them a 6-on-4 advantage they couldn't tie it.

It was the Canadians' third consecutive Olympic victory over the U.S., including the gold medal games in Vancouver and Salt Lake. But it was their first victory over the Americans for coach Kevin Dineen, who took over the team in December after a career in which he played for Hartford and Columbus and saw rivalries like the Red Sox and Yankees and Michigan-Ohio State up close.

"I think this one is the real deal," he said. "You always say, 'Oh, they don't like each other.' I don't think that. I think there's a mutual respect there. Sometimes to be really good, you have to have a foil."

Finland's Jenni Hiirikoski scored her second goal of the game with 2:22 left in overtime to help the 2010 bronze medalists escape with a 4-3 victory over Switzerland earlier Wednesday. The Finns earned the No. 3 seed in the Olympic playoffs, and they will play the loser of the round-robin finale between Russia and Sweden, with the other facing Switzerland.

"It's getting to be the fun part now," said Michelle Karvinen, who also scored twice for Finland. "I've been looking forward to getting to the real part of the tournament."

Hilary Knight also scored and Vetter stopped 28 shots for the United States, which also had secured a spot in the semis already. Charline Labonte made 25 saves for Canada, which had already earned a bye into the semifinals and now will take the No. 1 seed into the playoffs.

If they both win, they would meet again in the final.

"There's always plenty on the line" against the Americans, Wickenheiser said. "Whether there's a gold medal or not, it feels like a gold-medal game."

It's the fifth time the teams have met in the Olympics, but the first since women's hockey was added to the Winter Games in 1998 that they have played in the preliminary round. The Americans beat Canada twice that year - including the gold medal game - but it's been Canada ever since, at least in the Olympics.

In addition to leading their southern neighbors 3-1 in Olympic gold medals, Canada has 10 world championships to five for the United States. (No other country has won even one.)

The Americans have won five of the last seven, though, including last year's in Ottawa. In a pre-Olympic tuneup tour, the Canadians won three straight but then lost four in a row in the turmoil following coach Dan Church's surprise December resignation; he was replaced Dineen.

Through all of the winning and losing streaks, the teams have remained equal. And that's the way they played it for the first 37 minutes, with the goalies withstanding rush after rush to keep their shutouts intact.

The fans shouted dueling chants of "Ca-na-da!" and "U-S-A!" And none of the players on the bench sat down, either standing to cheer on their teammates or leaning over the boards.

The United States finally scored when Schleper's wrist shot was tipped by Knight into the net. But Canada tied it with a power-play goal of its own, making it 1-1 in the third period when Agosta parked on the right side of the net and waited for the pass from Wickenheiser.

The Canadians celebrated a second goal just 93 seconds later, then Agosta scored on a breakaway to make it 3-1.

Join the discussion

1000|Char. 1000  Char.
MTLBSTRD February 13 2014 at 3:36 AM

What the heck were they talking about? At app. 0:25 of the video, the blond says that Canada restored Olympic order by scoring three 3rd period goals to come from behind...WTF?

Or did the writer of the article get it wrong, as evidenced by these excerpts:
~ "Meghan Agosta scored in the second period to tie the game 1-1, and then Canada added the go-ahead goal 93 seconds later..."
~ "...giving Canada a 3-1 lead."
~ "The U.S. pulled the goalie and cut the deficit to one on Anne Schleper's goal with 65 seconds left..."
Given all the detail, I'm guessing the writer got it right.
Horrible, HORRIBLE job of reporting. Get a fraking clue, or let someone who knows what's going on do the reporting job.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
pepprgrl February 13 2014 at 1:24 AM

what a dumb video clip - no replay of the event discussed. just two unattractive yackers not doing anything but summing up the article, in a hs reporting fashion, painful to watch.
dont waste your time watching that clip!

Flag Reply +5 rate up
2 replies
chdblwinnr pepprgrl February 13 2014 at 2:04 AM

You took the comment right off my computer screen. Painful to watch those 2.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
knighttrain68 pepprgrl February 13 2014 at 4:57 AM

Too late.. your absolutely right though..

Flag Reply +1 rate up
Tom February 13 2014 at 5:52 AM

I didn't even know women played hockey.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
3 replies
keystonekid28id February 12 2014 at 11:57 PM

Here's an idea, why don't you show the goal so we can see for ourselves.

Flag Reply +7 rate up
cruisedoc February 12 2014 at 11:52 PM

Sometimes it comes down to the wire - a fraction of a second - and those calls are tough after a long crueling game. I trust the coaches perspective since one can see much from ice-level, mid-ice. Then, I trust replay cameras more.
Look if it was that close, both teams should be very proud & were playing largely to their equal (at that moment in time). I'll commend both.
Personally, I played up through junior-A, then coached univ. hockey for a year. So, I have some experience. Winning by such a hair dosen't feel good. You take the win & may even say that a win is a win, but at some level you know it isn't the cleanest win & if some call it a 'cheap win' you feel it.
Me? I congradulate both.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
brizander February 12 2014 at 11:23 PM

Refs were brutal. All the goals were legit. However Canada had too many skaters on the ice 3 times and the refs only caught it once with just moments to go in the game. Refs let some of the boday check calls slide for Canada yet called them on the USA. Call it both ways. Very good game though. Lots of room out there on that Olympic Ice. Both teams evenly matched. Going to be a great medal round.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
ocutv February 13 2014 at 1:37 AM

it only matters how they do in the match for gold.

Flag Reply +1 rate up
bzzzbayte February 13 2014 at 7:09 AM


Flag Reply +3 rate up
bzzzbayte February 13 2014 at 7:14 AM


Flag Reply +6 rate up
2 replies
lovelaurie bzzzbayte February 13 2014 at 9:20 AM

Matt Lauer is not worth watching whether in New York or Sochi!! Years ago, he had humility and was engaging....but that was, oh so many, years ago!

Flag Reply +1 rate up
luigi1947 bzzzbayte February 13 2014 at 4:29 PM

I fully agree with you......have not seen a single medal ceremony

Flag Reply 0 rate up
Tammy February 13 2014 at 10:24 AM

It seems everyone of the events where Americans are hyped they fall short; and the ones where the players are new and hungrier they do better. Maybe there's a lesson there!

Flag Reply +5 rate up
1 reply
Vinny Tammy February 13 2014 at 11:17 AM

Audio and vidio proved that it was a legal goal. Being a 'sore loser' is typical for Americans. Canada WON, so get over it.

Flag Reply +2 rate up
2 replies
JIM Vinny February 13 2014 at 11:24 AM

Maybe you need to get a better understanding of the English language. I see nothing in Tammy's reply that said it was not a legal goal, she was saying that when they are all hyped up and excited they wind up losing, and when they are a new person who has not been there and is relaxed they win. So she is admitting they lost. Sounds like you are from Canada and can't speak English very well, so it is ok you are a little ignorant of how to comprehend (that means to understand). Canada did win, and we are not disputing that. Learn how to speak and understand a language before trying to argue.

Flag +3 rate up
Human4u2 Vinny February 13 2014 at 11:49 AM

Rematch for the Gold.
You heard it hear first.
Pun Intended!

Flag +1 rate up
aol~~ 1209600


More From Our Partners