nb_cid nb_clickOther -tt-nb this.style.behavior='url(#default#homepage)';this.setHomePage('http://www.aol.com/?mtmhp=acm50ieupgradebanner_112313 network-banner-empty upgradeBanner
14
AOL.com
AOL.com
AOL Mail
AOL Mail
Video
Video
AOL Favorites
Favorites
AOL.com

Experts increasingly contemplate end of smoking



ATLANTA (AP) - Health officials have begun to predict the end of cigarette smoking in America.

They have long wished for a cigarette-free America, but shied away from calling for smoking rates to fall to zero or near zero by any particular year. The power of tobacco companies and popularity of their products made such a goal seem like a pipe dream.

But a confluence of changes has recently prompted public health leaders to start throwing around phrases like "endgame" and "tobacco-free generation." Now, they talk about the slowly-declining adult smoking rate dropping to 10 percent in the next decade and to 5 percent or lower by 2050.

Acting U.S. Surgeon General Boris Lushniak last month released a 980-page report on smoking that pushed for stepped-up tobacco-control measures. His news conference was an unusually animated showing of anti-smoking bravado, with Lushniak nearly yelling, repeatedly, "Enough is enough!"

"I can't accept that we're just allowing these numbers to trickle down," he said, in a recent interview with the AP. "We believe we have the public health tools to get us to the zero level."

This is not the first time a federal health official has spoken so boldly. In 1984, Surgeon General C. Everett Koop called for a "smoke-free society" by the year 2000. However, Koop - a bold talker on many issues - didn't offer specifics on how to achieve such a goal.

"What's different today is that we have policies and programs that have been proven to drive down tobacco use," said Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. "We couldn't say that in 1984."

Among the things that have changed:

-Cigarette taxes have increased around the country, making smokes more expensive. Though prices vary from state to state, on average a pack of cigarettes that would have sold for about $1.75 20 years ago would cost more than triple that now.

-Laws banning smoking in restaurants, bars and workplaces have popped up all over the country. Airline flights have long been off-limits for smoking.

-Polls show that cigarette smoking is no longer considered normal behavior, and is now less popular among teens than marijuana.

-Federal officials are increasingly aggressive about anti-smoking advertising. The Food and Drug Administration launched a new youth tobacco prevention campaign last week. At about the same time, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention debuted a third, $60-million round of its successful anti-tobacco ad campaign - this one featuring poignant, deathbed images of a woman featured in earlier ads.

-Tobacco companies, once considered impervious to legal attack, have suffered some huge defeats in court. Perhaps the biggest was the 1998 settlement of a case brought by more than 40 states demanding compensation for the costs of treating smoking-related illnesses. Big Tobacco agreed to pay about $200 billion and curtail marketing of cigarettes to youths.

-Retailing of cigarettes is changing, too. CVS Caremark, the nation's second-largest pharmacy chain, announced last week it will stop selling tobacco products at its more than 7,600 drugstores. The company said it made the decision in a bid to focus more on providing health care, but medical and public health leaders predicted pressure will increase on companies like Walgreen Co. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. to follow suit.

"I do think, in another few years, that pharmacies selling cigarettes will look as anachronistic" as old cigarette ads featuring physician endorsements look today, said CDC Director Dr. Tom Frieden.

These developments have made many in public health dream bigger. It's caused Myers' organization and others to recently tout the goal of bringing the adult smoking rate down to 10 percent by 2024, from the current 18 percent. That would mean dropping it at twice the speed it declined over the last 10 years.

The bigger goal is to reduce U.S. smoking-related deaths to fewer than 10,000, from the current level of 480,000. But even if smoking rates dropped to zero immediately, it would take decades to see that benefit, since smoking-triggered cancers can take decades to develop.

But while some experts and advocates are swinging for the fences, others are more pessimistic. They say the key to reaching such goals is not simply more taxes and more local smoking bans, but action by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to regulate smoking.

A 2009 federal law gave the FDA the authority to regulate tobacco products. The law barred FDA from outright blocking the sale of cigarettes, but the agency was free to take such pivotal steps as prohibiting the use of appealing menthol flavoring in cigarettes and requiring cigarette makers to ratchet down the amount of addictive nicotine in each smoke.

But nearly five years after gaining power over cigarettes, FDA has yet to even propose such regulations. Agency officials say they're working on it.

Many believe FDA's delay is driven by defense preparations for an anticipated battery of legal and political challenges.

A spokesman for Altria Group Inc., the maker of Marlboro, said the company supports FDA exercising its regulatory authority over tobacco products. But as a whole, the industry has tended to fight regulation. Some of the nation's largest tobacco companies - though not Altria - sued to stop FDA-proposed graphic warning labels on cigarette packs. A federal court blocked the ads.

"The industry makes money as long as they can delay regulation," said Kenneth Warner, a University of Michigan public health professor who is a leading authority on smoking and health.

Warner and Michigan colleague David Mendez estimate that, barring any major new tobacco control victories, the adult smoking rate will drop from its current 18 percent only to about 12 percent by 2050. If health officials do make huge strides, the rate could drop as low as 6 percent, they think.

But Lushniak said zero. Will that ever happen?

Some experts doubt it. As long as cigarettes and other combustible tobacco products are legal, it's likely some people will smoke them. Efforts to prohibit them are likely to fail, they say. (Remember Prohibition?)

"It's hard to do a ban on cigarettes because you're taking something away from people they have and are using. Once you have something, you hold tight," said Richard Daynard, a Northeastern University law professor who focuses on tobacco issues.

Better, he said, to bar people from having a product in the first place. He is intrigued by legal efforts in Singapore and a handful of other countries to ban sales of tobacco to anyone born after a certain year - 2000, say. That would be constitutional, he said. The question is: Would our culture accept it?

Probably not, said Ruth Malone, editor-in-chief of the scientific journal Tobacco Control.

"In our culture, we tend to think we have a right to things even if they're terrible for us," she said.

A growing number of experts believe the most promising option is to get people to switch voluntarily to something else, like electronic cigarettes.

Electronic cigarettes are battery-powered devices that provide users with aerosol puffs that typically contain nicotine, and sometimes flavorings like fruit, mint or chocolate. They've often been described as a less dangerous alternative to regular cigarettes. But there are few studies exploring exactly what chemicals are in them, and in what concentrations, and whether those levels are harmful.

They're controversial: Some experts believe that at a time when cigarette smoking has finally become passe in popular culture, e-cigarettes may re-glamorize puffing away in public places. Cigarette sales could surge.

"It could go in either direction," said John Seffrin, the American Cancer Society's chief executive officer.

But if the FDA can ratchet down nicotine in conventional cigarettes to levels below what's in e-cigarettes, perhaps everyone who clings to smoking will switch to the higher-nicotine new products. That could achieve the end of smoking, at least of combustible, carcinogen-filled cigarettes - or so the thinking goes.

In the past, "the country really wasn't ready" to walk away from cigarettes," Daynard said. "I think the country's ready now."

More From You

332 Comments
*0 / 3000 Character Maximum
Filter by:
Victoria February 10 2014 at 5:52 PM

So sorry to see it go. I don't smoke anymore, but miss it because I have gained 20 lbs and when I smoked I didn't eat as much...didn't have the chlosteral I have now.

Reply Flag as Abusive rate up rate down
LL February 10 2014 at 4:28 PM

To The Young Man or Young Lady Reading This:

KEEP YOUR LUNGS YOUNG, FOREVER - becasue once you start, you're done for good - well done that is, no matter how much will power you think you may have, and - even when you quit, ..... you will forever be a "recovering smoker" , and just three years into it and emphesema is GUARNTEED, ..... but all for what ?

Stress relief ?..... Be part of the cool crowd ?.....But dad or mom smokes and they seem fine ?...... but all of these are just excuses for sticking a pacifier into your mouth, that does everything but pacify what it is that you are attempting to justify,..... and if for no other reason, then remember this:


The next time you need to "RUN" for your life, ..... chances are good that the person that's chasing you smokes, and guess who will win that race,..... and guess who lives on ???

Reply Flag as Abusive +1 rate up rate down
Tony February 10 2014 at 4:07 PM

I would advise all who engage in it to seek help in stoping,and like your article suggests hopefully never start....like all adictions IT CAN BE BROKEN.....you must be comitted to changing the persons,places,and things in your life that enable you to smoke,it will not be easy,and I pray for your stength...good luck and God Bless You.

Reply Flag as Abusive rate up rate down
douginflorida1 February 10 2014 at 3:43 PM

No more cigarettes, sugar drinks, or junk food. We medicate our youth with mood altering drugs while our adult population pops hydro codone like the dreaded M&Ms... Free will is limited to what the pharmecutical giants tell you it is.

Reply Flag as Abusive rate up rate down
Drew February 10 2014 at 3:06 PM

spoiler alert......the ''marlboro'' man has already set his sights on asia were there are endless resourses and customer base I just dont know if they will accept ''joe camel'' there

Reply Flag as Abusive rate up rate down
1 reply to Drew's comment
LL February 10 2014 at 4:29 PM

The MARLBORO Man is D-E-A-D, Drew !

Reply Flag as Abusive rate up rate down
Debbie February 10 2014 at 2:38 PM

ok so smoking is on the downside .. what about alcohol? Why isnt there a high tax on alcohol? Seems to me if a person has to start paying higher rates for alcohol he will be less inclined to consume as much thus, less dui's and overcrowded prisons and less accidents, injuires and deaths.

Reply Flag as Abusive +1 rate up rate down
mmullen328 February 10 2014 at 2:20 PM

Smoking is an awful addiction, harder to quit than heroin. Why are there not rehabs for smokers? The federal governments sponsors hundreds of clinics for drug users. If nicotine is considered a harmful drug, why are there no government-sponsored programs to help people quit?

Reply Flag as Abusive -1 rate up rate down
Gene & Robbie February 10 2014 at 2:19 PM

it's all about money. we all know smoking is not good for you, but we do it. drinking alchol in excive is very bad, having sex with out protection will kill you to but there not stopping them. they found a way to make money from pott sales the taxes on pott is ten times that of cigs. just like every thing else the fda gets there hands on it's no good for you we sell it some other area and we as citizens go there to get it. if it's no good to us how do we sell it to another country and they are having success REMBER IT'S ALL ABOUT MONEY

Reply Flag as Abusive rate up rate down
hand201 February 10 2014 at 1:52 PM

Anne, what about mental deficiency

Reply Flag as Abusive rate up rate down
Rap Scallion February 10 2014 at 1:43 PM

You know what is really funny.....we have spend millions of dollars and lots of time and political energy...to stop people from lighting up and ingesting smoke from burning materials into their lungs.

AND then we tell through those very same people aand media talking heads, and politicos, that you cannot smoke tobacco, but it is fine to like up a doobie as big as a cucumber and ingest that into your lungs!

Only in America.......smoking is bad for your health but smoking pot is great!

Reply Flag as Abusive +2 rate up rate down
~~ 2592000

Voting...

More From Our Partners