14
Search AOL Mail
AOL Mail
Video
Video
AOL Favorites
Favorites
Menu

Woman stuck on 'no-fly' list after FBI checks wrong box

Student Stuck On 'No Fly' List After FBI Checks Wrong Box

By Dan Levine

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A long court battle waged by a Malaysian architect over her mistaken inclusion on the U.S. government's no-fly list may never have started if a federal agent had marked the correct boxes on an official form.

Rahinah Ibrahim sued the U.S. government in 2006 after she was placed on the no-fly list and was then denied a U.S. visa.

After years of litigation and appeals, U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco issued a short statement last month saying that existing procedures to correct mistakes on the no-fly list do not provide adequate due process protections.

The judge's detailed opinion, publicly filed on Thursday, describes how Ibrahim wound up on the no-fly list in the first place.

According to the ruling, an FBI agent in San Jose, California, had not intended to place Ibrahim on the list, but checked the wrong boxes on a form.

"That it was human error may seem hard to accept - the FBI agent filled out the nomination form in a way exactly opposite from the instructions on the form," Alsup wrote, "a bureaucratic analogy to a surgeon amputating the wrong digit - human error, yes, but of considerable consequence."

A U.S. Department of Justice spokeswoman declined to comment on the ruling.

The no-fly list has become the subject of multiple legal challenges. Ibrahim's case is believed to have been the first to go to trial, which took place in December.

Ibrahim attended Stanford University on a student visa, according to court filings. In early 2005, she was detained for two hours at San Francisco's airport because authorities believed she was on the no-fly list.

Eventually, she was allowed to travel to Malaysia. However, her U.S. visa was revoked under a legal provision relating to suspected terrorist activities, though she was not told the specific factual basis for that action. She has not been allowed to return to the United States.

Ibrahim petitioned U.S. authorities to clear her name, but instead received a letter that did not say whether she was still on the no-fly list. She filed a lawsuit, claiming that her inability to return to the United States damaged her professionally.

The U.S. government has since conceded that Ibrahim is not a national security threat. She is currently the dean of architecture at Universiti Putra Malaysia.

In his ruling, Alsup wrote that it is reasonable to believe that the FBI agent's original mistake led to Ibrahim's subsequent visa problems.

Once false information is entered into one government database, Alsup wrote, "it can propagate extensively through the government's interlocking complex of databases, like a bad credit report that will never go away."

Law enforcement must track terrorists and maintain secret watchlists, such as the no-fly list, Alsup wrote. However, this case "involves a conceded, proven, undeniable and serious error by the government," he wrote.

The judge ordered U.S. authorities to correct any mistaken information about Ibrahim and also to disclose more information relating to the denial of her visa application.

The case in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California is Rahinah Ibrahim vs Department of Homeland Security et al, 06-545.

(Reporting by Dan Levine, editing by G Crosse)

Join the discussion

1000|Char. 1000  Char.
ycplum February 07 2014 at 1:12 PM

It is kind of scary that you can be on the No Fly list with just a check in a box.

In my opinion, every one on the No Fly list should have a file justifying why they are on the list. Furthermore, a person can challenge being on the list and the FBI has to address their challenge within 3 month or they are off the list. By address, I mean the FBI has to find the file, review it and give a reason why a person is on teh list. The person can challenge teh allegations, but that would not be included in the 3 month time limit.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
foxylynx February 07 2014 at 3:13 PM

Big Brother is protecting you, lol.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
sfrly55 February 07 2014 at 2:58 PM

And to all the fools who say, you have nothing to fear from the NSA etc if you aren't doing anything wrong, welcome to the gulag archipelago your indifference has facilitated. Now go look that up.

Flag Reply +6 rate up
SRJimVal2 February 07 2014 at 3:55 PM

So they couldn't have rechecked the application and discovered the error, right after it was discovered??

Flag Reply +9 rate up
John February 07 2014 at 3:59 PM

I think that there needs to be at least two people filling out these forms to catch errors like this. I also feel a person put on this list be informed of why.

Flag Reply +8 rate up
tomjohnkraus February 07 2014 at 4:44 PM

Just go to Mexico, and join the crowd coming in.

Flag Reply +4 rate up
1 reply
ferouz tomjohnkraus February 07 2014 at 4:48 PM

You will not be allowed in Mexico.

Flag Reply 0 rate up
hifie February 07 2014 at 2:57 PM

This is an example of what has been going on for some time with more than just Rahinah Ibrahim. The only good thing about this is that she was not sitting in a jail somewhere waiting for due process. We have many people wrongfully doing time because of intentional proprietorial and police omissions and errors. It is truly sad and criminal that they deny the people justice to hide their own crime.

Flag Reply +6 rate up
elendil3136 February 07 2014 at 4:59 PM

Typical. Instead of simply admitting a mistake and moving on, the government fights like hell to cover up its error.

How often has this happened and we haven't heard of it?

Flag Reply +7 rate up
bpcats February 07 2014 at 4:27 PM

14 years to correct an administrative error!! This shows what happens when small minds get too much power.

Flag Reply +7 rate up
Larry February 07 2014 at 4:43 PM

Gummunt incompetance?
Whoda thunk it?

Flag Reply +2 rate up
aol~~ 1209600

Voting...

More From Our Partners