nb_cid nb_clickOther -tt-nb this.style.behavior='url(#default#homepage)';this.setHomePage('http://www.aol.com/?mtmhp=acm50s247banner041514 network-banner-promo mtmhpBanner
AOL Mail
AOL Mail
AOL Favorites

Michelle Bachelet wins Chile presidency by a landslide

SANTIAGO, Chile (AP) - Chile's once and future President Michelle Bachelet won Sunday's runoff election after promising profound changes in society in response to years of street protests.

With 90 percent of the votes counted, Bachelet had an unbeatable 62 percent to 38 percent for the center-right's Evelyn Matthei, who conceded defeat.

A moderate socialist, Bachelet served as president in 2006-2010, then ran the United Nation's women's agency from New York as her successor, conservative Sebastian Pinera, was confronted with widespread demonstrations for change.

She has a new center-left coalition and promises to finance education with higher corporate taxes, reduce the wealth gap, protect the environment and reform the constitution.

But concerns that turnout would be low had worried Bachelet, who needed a strong mandate to make good on her promises.

"This is an important day and I hope people can come and participate and through their vote give a clear expression of the kind of Chile where they want to continue to live," Bachelet said after voting in her Santiago neighborhood of La Reina. "The changes we need can't be produced through skepticism."

Bachelet, 62, left office with 84 percent approval ratings despite failing to achieve any major changes.

This time, activists are vowing to hold her to promises to raise corporate taxes to help fund an education overhaul and even change the dictatorship-era constitution, a difficult goal given congressional opposition.

Many Chileans blame policies imposed by Gen. Augusto Pinochet's 1973-1990 dictatorship for keeping wealth and power in few hands. Pinochet effectively ended land reform by selling off the nation's water, and preserved the best educations for elites by ending the central control and funding of public schools.

Opinion polls had pointed to a bruising defeat for Matthei, a former finance minister, because of her past support for Pinochet and her ties to the current president. Pinera, a billionaire entrepreneur, was Chile's first center-right president since democracy's return, and with just 34 percent support in the latest CEP poll, the most unpopular.

This was Chile's first presidential election after voter registration became automatic, increasing the electorate from 8 million to 13.5 million of the country's nearly 17 million people. But voting became optional with the change, and only 50 percent of voters turned out in the first round, frustrating both the major coalitions.

It also was Chile's first choice between two women, both with long careers in politics.

Bachelet, a pediatrician, and Matthei, an economist, share a dramatic history: Playmates while growing up on a military base, they found themselves on opposite sides of Chile's wide political divide after the 1973 military coup.

Matthei's father became a member of Pinochet's junta while Bachelet's father was tortured to death for refusing to support the strongman. Bachelet was imprisoned herself and forced into exile.

The two women remained cordial over the years while they rose through the ranks of the right and left.

Matthei, 60, had campaigned with a call to continue business-friendly policies that she credited for Chile's fast growth and low unemployment under Pinera. She backed Pinochet in a 1988 referendum on continuing his rule and now opposes changing the Pinochet-era constitution. She's also against gay marriage, abortion and higher taxes.

Bachelet is seen as having more charisma and empathy, but her critics say she's made mistakes.

When a devastating earthquake struck in 2010 killing more than 500 people just 11 days before the end of her term, the national emergency office failed to issue a tsunami warning. Many coastal dwellers had figured they were safe, and failed to run to higher ground.

"I want change and I don't like Mrs. Bachelet. She did so many bad things when she was president," said Olga Espinoza, 62, a maid who voted for Matthei. "How many people died in the quake because of her? We're the same age, we have the same zodiac sign, but I don't like anything about her."

Chile is the world's top copper producer, and its fast-growing economy, low unemployment and stable democracy are the envy of Latin America. But many Chileans are insisting that more of the copper wealth be used to fix the underfunded public education system.

"Abroad you often hear that this country has been growing and progressing more than others in Latin America, but it can't be just a matter of growth," Paola Bustamante, a 40-year-old sculptor, said after voting for Bachelet. "We need urgent educational reform, improvements to health, and I feel Bachelet can fulfill promises of deep changes this time around."

More From You

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum
Filter by:
jksu2 December 16 2013 at 4:09 PM

Venezuela II

Reply Flag as Abusive rate up rate down
ryankyletippens December 16 2013 at 3:52 PM

I feel bad for those poor people,a damn socialist running their country.The only thing worse is a socialist wannabe like Obama.Thats so sad

Reply Flag as Abusive rate up rate down
jerry_right December 16 2013 at 2:58 PM

I am wondering if by chance our fearless leader, Obummer and this lady are somehow related?
Both are socialists and both want to take money away from the working class to give it to the poor.
Also, I would like to point out, that the so called rich and corporations already in OUR country pay close to 90 percent of the taxes.
But never mind all that, I just know that socialistic countries cannot succeed at all. If you look around, and check around, you will see what I mean. We are heading downhill in a hurry, and Chile will head deeper down hill, than they already have.
France is a good example of socialism causing major problems and there are others. Sorry Folks in Chile, I think you made a bad decision, just like we made a bad decision when we voted our problem back into a second term.

Reply Flag as Abusive +1 rate up rate down
Marilene December 16 2013 at 1:21 PM

I'm is waiting for USA have a wooman for presidency!

Reply Flag as Abusive +1 rate up rate down
1 reply to Marilene's comment
jerry_right December 16 2013 at 2:59 PM

As long as it is NOT Hillary Clinton I am fine with that thought.

Reply Flag as Abusive +1 rate up rate down
Marilene December 16 2013 at 1:19 PM

I am a normal person. I like to play piano and violin(continue to learn). I'm bilinguage poet (English and Portuguese). I'm composed some music but it never been published. I like to read about everything...

Reply Flag as Abusive +1 rate up rate down
milomirage December 16 2013 at 12:11 PM


Reply Flag as Abusive +2 rate up rate down
navybus1 December 16 2013 at 9:33 AM

Well, there goes the neighborhood...back to paying for the poor to such a degree that they wont be poor anymore...tax the rich out of existence and see what happens to Chile again.

Apopka, Fl.

Reply Flag as Abusive +3 rate up rate down
Martha December 16 2013 at 9:26 AM

I believe, big business and the top rich should be taxed heavier than the rest; as the middle class pays way more in taxes than those under the poverty line. And, boy does the middle class pay! So much so, that soon there won't be a middle class just the poor and the very rich. Imagine us, just another a third world country!
Regardless, what I'd really like to share is that big business, as I said, should be heavily taxed. But we have to wake up to the fact that if they are taxed, as they should be and not given freebies for the major "privilage" of producing here, they will move on somewhere else other then the good ole USA because anywhere in Asia, Central and South America etc. it's so much more economical, no down right Cheap to produce. So, we need an incentive for these expatriot (non patriotic?) owners and stock holders. And, that incentive needs to be something that's NOT a gift! How about if you don't make your products here you can't sell them here?!?!? Is that too cruel, unfeasble or against the law? Well, if it is too bad and laws are made up every single day about the oddest things so there should be no problem there. Of course, these misery makers in our country line the pockets of the well off and our dear politicians (not mentioning parties here...all of them) ...now there's the main problem.

A los Chilenos felicidades!!!

Reply Flag as Abusive -2 rate up rate down
2 replies to Martha's comment
raventug123 December 16 2013 at 9:35 AM

Guess what Martha...The top tier already pay over 89% of all taxes. Maybe instead of publiclally proclaiming your stupidity you could do some research first...You know, like work?

Reply Flag as Abusive +3 rate up rate down
tgldd December 16 2013 at 10:43 AM

left wing ignorANT WOMAN.
CORPORATE TAX INCREase is socialist and will only suceed in keeping you kids from getting good jobs. you should be banned from ever voting. you obama moron believe all he says go sign up for obama cARE YOU STUPID STUPID WOMAN

Reply Flag as Abusive +3 rate up rate down
cshae89546 December 16 2013 at 9:25 AM

The bottom line in socialism is that the government produces NOTHING and everything it "gives" to the citizenry is derived from those in the society who can and do produce. All socialist governments are bureaucracies which by definition is a body of nonelective government officials and an administrative policy and regulation making group which exists in a non-mutual symbiotic relationship with the producers and which benefits at the expense of the the producers.

Reply Flag as Abusive +2 rate up rate down
TED December 16 2013 at 8:28 AM

Only a fool would believe that a tax on corporations will actually be paid by the corporation and not the consumer with higher prices.....corporations must pass all "costs of doing business" on to the consumer, whether the leftists like it or not, that is just a fact of business............but then most on the left no nothing about creating jobs and building a business....they have no practical experience and depend on academia for socialst ideological answers which get votes but induces proverty, which gets more votes!

Reply Flag as Abusive +2 rate up rate down
~~ 2592000


More From Our Partners