Why This Jaw-Dropping Bank Move Is an Empty Threat
Recently, big banks like Bank of America , Wells Fargo , and JPMorgan Chase have gotten criticism for discussing potentially charging customers to keep deposits at their banks. Yet savers should realize that big banks are bluffing with a losing hand, as any suggestion of charging customers for deposits is an empty threat.
In the following video, Dan Caplinger, The Motley Fool's director of investment planning, examines why charging depositors to have bank accounts would backfire on the big banks. He notes that deposit rates are subject to supply and demand, and that even though B of A, Wells, and JPMorgan might not want excess deposits, other banks do -- and they're willing to pay for them. Pointing to higher rates from banks run by Sallie Mae and General Electric's GE Capital, Dan figures that as long as other banks are willing to pay for deposits, customers' best move will be to vote with their feet if larger banks try to charge them for the privilege of banking with them.
If you can't beat them, join them
Another way to handle big-bank fee increases is to invest in them. But not all banks are created equal. In a sea of mismanaged and dangerous peers, it rises above as "The Only Big Bank Built to Last." You can uncover the top pick that Warren Buffett loves in The Motley Fool's new report. It's free, so click here to access it now.
The article Why This Jaw-Dropping Bank Move Is an Empty Threat originally appeared on Fool.com.Fool contributor Dan Caplinger owns warrants on Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Bank of America and Wells Fargo. It owns shares of General Electric and JPMorgan Chase. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.