Manufacturing Growth Crawls, and Economic Recovery Stalls

Before you go, we thought you'd like these...
Watches are being assembled by Tenesha Martin at the Shinola watch and bike company in the Argonaut Building in Detroit, Michigan, U.S., on Wednesday, May 15, 2013. The Argonaut Building is General Motors former research laboratory and moved out in the 90's. Photographer: Jeff Kowalsky/Bloomberg *** Local Caption ***
Getty Images
The housing market may have pushed us into the Great Recession, but analysts are increasingly expecting it will be manufacturing that gets the economy back on track. So for insights on when that jump into strong growth might finally arrive, smart investors are keeping a weather eye on the manufacturing reports that detail how much is being produced, where businesses are finding buyers, and what both groups foresee as the near-future state of our economy.

Right now, the answers to those questions aren't all that upbeat: Four new reports released this week suggest there are cracks at the foundation of the economic recovery.

Mayday, Mayday

There's no beating around the bush: Manufacturing is making minimal gains at best.

While a Markit manufacturing report released Monday pins May's manufacturing growth at a seven-month low, the Institute for Supply Management saw manufacturing shrinking for the first time since November 2012. The discrepancy between the two reports is significant, but either result is worrisome.

Those top line numbers make for good headline fodder, but it's down in the individual index components that investors can get a more precise perspective.

Five of the ISM index's 10 components fell back from April growth to May contraction. Dips in production, supplier deliveries, and prices point to trouble today, while drops in new orders and order backlogs hint at hurdles ahead. And although Markit's index indicates some minimal May growth, its new export-orders component also contracted.

Transportation Elevation?

After a mediocre Monday, a Wednesday factory report from the Department of Commerce did little to lift spirits. Although it showed new orders for manufactured goods increased 1 percent for April, analysts had expected a 1.4 percent bump after March's 4.7 percent drop.

Sponsored Links
Much like the ISM index, the Commerce Department's data includes both present and future manufacturing indicators. But this report also pinpoints which industries are packing the most production punch.

Here's the key takeaway from that report: Growth in the transportation sector is the only thing keeping manufacturing in positive territory. Excluding transportation, new orders for April drop from a 1 percent gain to a 0.1 percent slump.

And looking ahead, it's worth asking if automakers might be being overly optimistic. A 1.4 percent increase in transportation inventories pushed overall inventories to their highest level since data was first collected in 1992.

Bubble Trouble

Manufacturing takes manpower, and a new productivity and costs report reveals that output isn't adding up to expectations.

Although nonfarm business productivity is up 0.5 percent for the first quarter of 2013, analysts had hoped for a repeat of the 0.7 percent gains experienced in 2012's fourth quarter. Luckily for manufacturers, a 4.3 percent dip in costs helped to minimize the effects of a whopping 11.8 percent fourth-quarter increase.

But the overall picture points to potential bubble trouble in manufacturing employment.

Unit labor costs might be on a short-term rise because manufacturers aren't hiring as many new workers. Both Markit's and the ISM's May reports recorded slower rates of employment expansion, and the ISM's reading hovers just above contraction levels.

Short-term efficiency gains aren't necessarily bad, but if companies are overworking employees or shirking time-intensive tasks, the sector could be hit with a longer-term productivity squeeze in the future.

Can Manufacturing Make It?

"Slow and steady" is the name of the game for the housing recovery and our overall economy, but it might not cut it for manufacturing. Inventories are growing, new orders are drying up, and a closer look at indicators reveals industry-specific discrepancies and precarious productivity.

There's a lot of manure in manufacturing news, but a peck of perspective can keep investors in the macroeconomic know. And while sector trends are no replacement for careful company analysis, the savviest investors will always make the most of the latest manufacturing reports.

You can follow Motley Fool contributor Justin Loiseau on Twitter @TMFJLo.

Manufacturing Growth Crawls, and Economic Recovery Stalls

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) was for years considered the best-run bank in America, and its CEO, Jamie Dimon, the top banker. Dimon steered it through the financial crisis of 2008 in a way its competitors couldn't match. Unfortunately, JPMorgan is one more brand that was tarnished almost overnight. A single trader in JPMorgan's London office lost the bank $6.2 billion, and there are concerns the write-off process is not over. Dimon erred by saying the incident was isolated and based on management stupidity. The federal government did not accept that, and neither did investors.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve made harsh assessments of the bank's risk management in January. Both agencies found "unsafe or unsound practices and violations of law or regulation." The criticism didn't end there. In March, the Office of the Comptroller downgraded JPMorgan's management rating. The reputation of the bank, almost entirely intertwined with Dimon, suffered one last blow. Investors have pushed to strip Dimon of his role as chairman, which has caused speculation that an incident that began in London could eventually cost him his job as CEO.

Research In Motion Ltd. (BBRY) announced earlier this year that it would rename itself after its most famous product -- the BlackBerry. New management has said that the BlackBerry Z10 and the redesigned operating system, which was delayed three times, are critical to turning around the business. But the product, which the company is betting on, is of only limited interest to the public. The BlackBerry brand already has been pressed to near extinction by competitors, including the Apple iPhone and Google Android OS smartphones, led by Samsung products. Apple's iPhone had about half of BlackBerry's market share in 2008, and Google Android was in its infancy. By the end of 2011, BlackBerry had less than 9% market share, Apple had almost 24%, and Android OS phones dominated with more than 50%.

In the history of smartphones, the 2013 launch of the BlackBerry Z10 may be only a footnote. The release was late, and most reviews have been mixed, at best. Early sales of the new device have been modest, and certainly not enough to dent the market share of Apple, which sold 47.8 million iPhones in its most recently released quarter. The Z10 was hardly the start of the downfall of the BlackBerry brand, but it may be the final chapter.

Shortly after launching in November 2008, Groupon Inc. (GRPN) began to revolutionize the coupon business. The company sent retail offers online to customers, which it targeted based on where they lived and worked, as well as their stated interests. Merchants and customers adopted the new model at a blazing pace, at least early on. Revenue increased from $3.3 million in the second quarter of 2009 to $644.7 million in the first quarter of 2011, the company reported.

When Groupon went public in November 2011, its trouble with the SEC about overstating revenue already had begun. Another SEC investigation caused the company to restate fourth-quarter 2011 revenue and drove down the share price 10%. In addition to accounting scandals, Groupon is having trouble fending off competition from peers LivingSocial, Amazon and brick-and-mortar retailers who do not want to be flanked by online coupon competition. After three years of hyper-expansion, Groupon forecasts 2013 revenue growth at a tepid 0% to 9%. Earlier this year, Groupon co-founder and CEO Andrew Mason was fired. Rejecting Google's $6 billion dollar offer (the company is now worth $4 billion), issues with the SEC and zero growth did not sit well with his board and co-founders after all.

If the stock market is any indication of the success of electronics retailer Best Buy Co. (BBY), it is worth remembering that its shares traded just below $49 nearly three years ago. Even after rallying since the start of the year, shares currently trade under $26. Best Buy has been its own worst enemy.

CEO Brian Dunn, who was charged with the company's turnaround, was fired in May 2012 for a relationship with a female employee. Founder and chairman Richard Schulze left under a dark cloud shortly thereafter when it was discovered he knew of the affair and did not tell the rest of the board. Then, last August, Schulze offered to take Best Buy private. Recently, he dropped the deal and rejoined the board. Even Schulze couldn't make the case that the company was healthy enough to be taken over, which raises the question of whether he believes the company he started has a dim future.

One of Best Buy's problems is that it has become the showroom for Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN). This was on display when it announced the financials for the quarter that ended on March 3, 2012. The company said that it had lost $1.7 billion, compared to a profit of $651 million the year before, and would close 50 stores. Best Buy also said that the critical marker of same-store sales had fallen, and that it expected the slide to continue.

The deterioration of one of America's oldest retailers has been going on for some time. In the five years before Ron Johnson's appointment in late 2011, J.C. Penney Co.'s (JCP) share price dropped 60% under CEO Myron "Mike" Ullman. Johnson embarked on an expensive turnaround plan, which included a new logo, advertising and the end of deep discounts, coupons and sales events once popular with customers. None of this appears to have worked. Total sales fell 24.8% last year to $13 billion, while same-store sales fell 25.2%. Internet sales, absolutely critical to retailers as e-commerce emerges as a primary source of revenue, dropped 33% during the year. The day after Johnson's dismissal, share prices hit a 12-year low.

Firing Johnson this week was the clearest repudiation of his turnaround strategy and the only sane decision by the board. According to recent reports, same-store sales dropped 10% in the quarter that just ended, likely contributing to his dismissal. Reinstating the former CEO responsible for the company's previous woes defies explanation.

The huge aerospace company has turned years of delays in the launch of its 787 Dreamliner into a nightmare for carriers. And passengers have become concerned whether the plane will be safe once it returns to service.


Major production delays began in 2007. The first passengers did not step aboard a 787 until an October 26, 2011, flight from Tokyo to Hong Kong - three and a half years later than initially planned. However, the events after that flight make the delays seem insignificant by comparison. Incidents of burning lithium-ion batteries caused the entire 787 fleet to be grounded. Despite further battery tests by Boeing Co. (BA) and regulators, the FAA has yet to allow the plane to go back into service. Ultimately, the 787 will be recertified, but the brand will be badly damaged for a very long time, at least in the eyes of the flying public. As the Los Angeles Times recently reported, "Boeing Co. is now battling on two fronts: fixing the source of the problem and regaining the trust of the flying public."

The South Korean vehicle maker and its stablemate Kia have been among the fastest growing car and light truck brands in America over the past decade. Hyundai's share of the U.S. market grew from about 2% in 2001 to more than 4% in 2011. During that period, Hyundai and Kia offered what Japanese companies had for decades -- high-quality vehicles at affordable prices. They burnished their images with a 100,000-mile warranty package dubbed "Hyundai Assurance." However, in November 2012, the EPA charged the companies with inflated gas-mileage claims, and they lowered the stated MPG ratings on many of their vehicles.

USA Today described Hyundai's reaction as "shocking." It said, "Hyundai, in a burst of hubris, deals with the issue by portraying itself as a consumer champion on its home page -- even though the reduction resulted from an Environmental Protection Agency investigation." More recently, Hyundai and Kia said they would recall approximately 1.9 million cars in the U.S. to "fix a potentially faulty brake light switch," Reuters reported.

Steve Jobs built Apple Inc. (AAPL) into a seemingly unassailable juggernaut -- and the world's most valuable public company. The reputation was carefully crafted for more than a decade by Jobs, who created entirely new product categories, and then dominated them with devices such as the iPod, iPhone and iPad. Apple's single most public disaster was its decision to dump rival Google Inc.'s (GOOG) Maps system and replace it with its own product. Following a huge wave of negative press, Apple CEO Tim Cook wrote a public letter apologizing for the mess and, at one point, even suggested users rely on Google Maps instead.

At the heart of Apple's brand decline is the simple fact that it has lost reputation as the prime innovator in the industries it once led. A year ago, no one could have imagined that a product like the Samsung Galaxy SIII would compete with the iPhone 5, or that the Galaxy S4 would be viewed as better than the iPhone. Apple lost its position as one of the world's top brands in a remarkably short time. It has not launched a revolutionary product in more than two years. For most companies, the launch of such a device once a decade would be sufficient. For Apple, it is nothing short of a failure.
Leave aside Stewart's five months in prison for lying about her sale of ImClone stock. Disregard her unbelievably high compensation as nonexecutive chairman of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. (MSO) -- even as the company's revenue has consistently dropped, and its shares have plummeted more than 60% during the past five years, while the S&P 500 has jumped 20%.

The domestic diva and her namesake company have landed on the front pages again, this time in a legal battle between Macy's Inc. (M) and J.C. Penney Co. (JCP) about which retailer has the rights to sell Stewart-labeled products. Martha Stewart Living cut a deal with J.C. Penney in late 2011, giving the retailer the right to sell Stewart-branded goods in its store. At the same time, J.C. Penney also bought 16.6% of Stewart's company for $38.5 million. Macy's promptly sued, claiming that its exclusive rights to the Stewart product line, set in 2006, had been violated. The latest public blunder has further damaged a brand that began a downward trend years ago.
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE
SHOW CAPTION +
HIDE CAPTION
Read Full Story

People are Reading

The Latest from our Partners
1 - 3 of 15