What Snap-on Does With Its Cash

Before you go, we thought you'd like these...
Before you go close icon

In the quest to find great investments, most investors focus on earnings to gauge a company's financial strength. This is a good start, but earnings can be misleading and incomplete. To get a clearer understanding of a company's ability to earn money and reward you, the shareholder, it's often better to focus on cash flow. In this series, we tear apart a company's cash flow statement to see how much money is truly being earned, and more importantly, what management is doing with that cash.

Step on up, Snap-on (NYS: SNA) .

The first step in analyzing cash flow is to look at net income. Snap-on's net income over the last five years has been impressive:

 

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Normalized Net Income

$257 million

$184 million

$143 million

$226 million

$179 million


Source: S&P Capital IQ.

Next, we add back in a few non-cash expenses like the depreciation of assets, and adjust net income for changes in inventory, accounts receivable, and accounts payable -- changes in cash levels that reflect a company either paying its bills, or being paid by customers. This yields a figure called cash from operating activities -- the amount of cash a company generates from doing everyday business.

From there, we subtract capital expenditures, or the amount a company spends acquiring or fixing physical assets. This yields one version of a figure called free cash flow, or the true amount of cash a company has left over for its investors after doing business:

 

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Free Cash Flow

$67 million

$89 million

$283 million

$147 million

$174 million

Source: S&P Capital IQ.

Now we know how much cash Snap-on is really pulling in each year. Next question: What is it doing with that cash?

There are two ways a company can use free cash flow to directly reward shareholders: dividends and share repurchases. Cash not returned to shareholders can be stashed in the bank, used to invest in other companies and assets, or to pay off debt.

Here's how much Snap-on has returned to shareholders in recent years:

 

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Dividends

$77 million

$71 million

$69 million

$70 million

$65 million

Share Repurchases

$37 million

$9 million

--

$70 million

$94 million

Total Returned To Shareholders

$114 million

$80 million

$69 million

$140 million

$159 million

Source: S&P Capital IQ.

As you can see, the company has repurchased a decent amount of its own stock. But combined with other rounds of share issuance, shares outstanding have been flat:

 

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Shares Outstanding (millions)

58

58

58

58

58

Source: S&P Capital IQ.

Now, companies tend to be fairly poor at repurchasing their own shares, buying feverishly when shares are expensive and backing away when they're cheap. Does Snap-on fall into this trap? Let's take a look:

anImage

Source: S&P Capital IQ.

Sure enough, Snap-on repurchased a lot of its stock in 2007 when shares were fairly high, none as they plunged during the financial crisis, and came back with buybacks after shares rebounded. Whether this was a prudent way to save cash as it looked like the economy was about to implode, or a classic example of buying high and panicking low, is up for debate. In general, it doesn't appear management has been the most astute buyer of its own stock.

Finally, I like to look at how dividends have added to total shareholder returns:

anImage

Source: S&P Capital IQ.

Shares returned 14% over the last five years, which increases to 30% with dividends reinvested -- a nice boost to top off otherwise low performance.

To gauge how well a company is doing, keep an eye on the cash. How much a company earns is not as important as how much cash is actually coming in the door, and how much cash is coming in the door isn't as important as what management actually does with that cash. Remember, you, the shareholder, own the company. Are you happy with the way management has used Snap-on's cash? Sound off in the comment section below.

At the time this article was published Fool contributorMorgan Houseldoesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. Follow him on Twitter @TMFHousel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe thatconsidering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Copyright © 1995 - 2012 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Read Full Story

Want more news like this?

Sign up for Finance Report by AOL and get everything from business news to personal finance tips delivered directly to your inbox daily!

Subscribe to our other newsletters

Emails may offer personalized content or ads. Learn more. You may unsubscribe any time.

From Our Partners