John Paulson Says the Time to Buy a House in the U.S. Is Right Now

Before you go, we thought you'd like these...
Before you go close icon
John Paulson says now is the best time buy a homeThe man who made billions betting against the subprime mortgage market seems to have a more positive view of our real estate market these days. John Paulson told a captive audience at the London School of Economics that now is the best time ever to buy a house in the United States.

He's bullish on real estate and gold, and thinks inflation is lurking around the corner. Taking California as an indicator, the hedge fund guru says sunny California has recently been a leading indicator for a positive turn in the housing market.

"And it turned positive seven months ago," Paulson told the group. "I think we're about to turn a corner."
And he's bullish on the U.S. economy. Paulson says he thinks we are at the tail of the credit crisis, which has stifled much home buying. He believes we are in the midst of a sustained recovery with a less than 10 percent risk of a double-dip recession. But while he's bullish on America, he's not as optimistic on Europe, calling it the "one soft spot" in the world.

But Paulson's own investments -- his fund is rated no. 1 in the world by Barrons -- reflect his inflation concerns: His firm is the largest holder of gold exchange-traded funds in the world. Paulson told his London audience that he fears future currency instability and inflation "due to the large amount of quantitative easing."

Paulson said he denominates all of his assets in gold and is bearish on the dollar. And he thinks we'll see high single and perhaps even double-digit inflation in three to five years, which he why he has been known to advise buying as many homes as you can stuff in your pocket.

Paulson bet against the subprime mortgage market, earning between $3 billion and $4 billion for himself in 2007 alone. He is the subject of writer Gregory Zuckerman's "The Greatest Trade Ever: How John Paulson Bet Against the Markets and Made $20 Billion." Of course, his actions stirred up strong emotions and criticism in the U.S. He was highly criticized for creating the Abacus fund for Goldman Sachs, basically a bundle of bad loans, and then betting against them, making windfall profits on the backs of people who were losing their homes to foreclosure. Goldman, of course, also played both sides of the game, buying credit default swaps against the bad assets in case they failed, which they did. Both reaped billions.

But Paulson claims his shorts had no impact on those families. "Without us, the mortgage market would have existed exactly as it did," says Paulson. "(Short-sellers) were a tiny portion of that market, maybe 2 to 3 percent."

So who were the culprits? The mortgage brokers, says Paulson.

"They only cared about generating fees, they falsified appraisals, " he said. "... this was the sad underbelly of mortgage finance in the U.S."

Paulson said his investment methodology has always been to short high-quality, but misplaced credit. When he went looking, he found subprime mortgage-backed securities. As he dug deeper he found mortgage lenders were lending out millions of dollars to borrowers with the poorest of underwriting standards -- they didn't require jobs, assets, or even a credit history. And of course it was zero-down payments for these borrowers. As many put it, lenders essentially put a mirror up to a borrower's nose and if he fogged the mirror, he got a mortgage loan.

"Basic underwriting standards were nonexistent," says Paulson.

So where were the rating agencies? Pauslon says he did argue a bit with the rating agencies, because their modeling techniques actually bewildered him. He exposed a logistical hole in their data. The agencies are backward-looking, but there has never been a period of time in the history of statistical real estate data when housing prices decreased. Thus the models didn't even figure in the possibility that housing could fail -- hello, crater.

But when Paulson exposed this downer, the agencies scratched their heads and and said they couldn't make up any data points or "hypothetical" scenarios to simulate falling housing prices for a big huge "what if." No sir, that would be speculating.

"And Moody's says it doesn't speculate,' " said Paulson.

More at AOL Real Estate:
See homes for sale in your area.
See foreclosures in your area.
Find out how to calculate mortgage
payments.

************************************************

Want to learn more about home buying and home finance? If so, you won't want to miss
our online discussion with industry experts,
"
What Works Now: Smart Moves When Buying a Home,"
created by AOL Real Estate in participation with Bank of America Home Loans.
Sign up for a reminder on AOL Real Estate
.
Read Full Story

Find a New Home

Buy
Rent
Value
Powered by Zillow

From Our Partners